Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Albert Town Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
145 Valid Reviews
The Albert Town Camping Ground experience has a total of 148 reviews. There are 145 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 145 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 24 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 30 |
|
21% |
8/10 | 42 |
|
29% |
7/10 | 18 |
|
12% |
6/10 | 14 |
|
10% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
76.90% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground valid reviews is 76.90% and is based on 145 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 145 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 80.42% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
75.93%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Marguerite | 10/10 | 24 days | 100% |
Harry | 6/10 | 52 days | 86% |
Frances | 4/10 | 52 days | 65% |
Oscar | 5/10 | 83 days | 76% |
Dora | 10/10 | 83 days | 100% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 114 days | 99% |
Sandy Penny | 1/10 | 114 days | 40% |
golden menu | 9/10 | 144 days | 98% |
Jen | 10/10 | 144 days | 99% |
Bart | 8/10 | 144 days | 97% |
Ellie | 10/10 | 175 days | 98% |
Aaron | 5/10 | 175 days | 75% |
Keith Fitzgerald | 8/10 | 175 days | 96% |
Helene | 3/10 | 389 days | 50% |
Christophe | 7/10 | 389 days | 85% |
Anna | 10/10 | 389 days | 91% |
Madge | 7/10 | 449 days | 82% |
max | 10/10 | 449 days | 89% |
Jo | 8/10 | 449 days | 87% |
Maren | 8/10 | 480 days | 85% |
Agnete | 10/10 | 480 days | 87% |
Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 8/10 | 510 days | 84% |
SK camper | 1/10 | 510 days | 35% |
Cholly | 7/10 | 541 days | 78% |
Dylan | 7/10 | 602 days | 74% |
Etoile Rose | 8/10 | 694 days | 71% |
Niff | 8/10 | 724 days | 69% |
Vicky | 7/10 | 755 days | 63% |
Julia | 5/10 | 814 days | 47% |
Vish | 6/10 | 814 days | 54% |
Chris | 8/10 | 814 days | 61% |
Charlotte Houël | 8/10 | 814 days | 61% |
Maxime Dube | 5/10 | 814 days | 47% |
Arnon Meshoulam | 6/10 | 845 days | 51% |
Hanna | 1/10 | 845 days | 24% |
Becky | 6/10 | 875 days | 49% |
Caolan Harvey | 8/10 | 875 days | 55% |
Lewis | 6/10 | 1089 days | 31% |
James | 8/10 | 1120 days | 33% |
Suzanne | 9/10 | 1424 days | 14% |
Sierra | 3/10 | 1454 days | 7% |
Rich | 9/10 | 1544 days | 9% |
Sophia | 9/10 | 1575 days | 8% |
Dan | 6/10 | 1605 days | 7% |
Lydia | 10/10 | 1605 days | 8% |
Cam | 8/10 | 1666 days | 6% |
Linda | 7/10 | 1850 days | 5% |
Maria | 6/10 | 1850 days | 4% |
Antonio | 10/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
Drew | 6/10 | 1910 days | 4% |
Angela | 8/10 | 1910 days | 5% |
Jason | 9/10 | 1910 days | 5% |
Lauren Smith | 10/10 | 2002 days | 5% |
Libby | 7/10 | 2002 days | 4% |
Ashley | 4/10 | 2063 days | 3% |
Alfie | 9/10 | 2063 days | 4% |
Hannah | 8/10 | 2094 days | 4% |
ScoutnIndi | 8/10 | 2124 days | 4% |
Rebecca | 8/10 | 2185 days | 4% |
JirkaR | 8/10 | 2216 days | 4% |
Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2216 days | 4% |
Marty | 4/10 | 2244 days | 3% |
Warrick | 2/10 | 2244 days | 2% |
Jeremy | 7/10 | 2275 days | 4% |
Zoe | 7/10 | 2275 days | 4% |
Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2275 days | 4% |
Marilli | 8/10 | 2306 days | 4% |
Henk Sjon | 7/10 | 2306 days | 4% |
Mitchell | 10/10 | 2336 days | 4% |
Robin Norris | 10/10 | 2336 days | 4% |
Sebaten | 9/10 | 2336 days | 4% |
Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2367 days | 4% |
Jonas R. | 7/10 | 2367 days | 4% |
Andres | 9/10 | 2428 days | 4% |
Laura Clay | 10/10 | 2581 days | 4% |
Louis Goring-Morris | 5/10 | 2607 days | 2% |
Meijerelske | 8/10 | 2646 days | 3% |
Nadene Wheatley | 5/10 | 2697 days | 3% |
Laura Delaney | 9/10 | 2718 days | 3% |
Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 2735 days | 3% |
Calo Taranto | 7/10 | 2776 days | 3% |
Alex Umbers | 8/10 | 2830 days | 3% |
Judy Aspinall | 8/10 | 2900 days | 3% |
Julie Yu | 10/10 | 2930 days | 3% |
Emily Livesey | 8/10 | 2935 days | 3% |
Jos Tolboom | 8/10 | 3000 days | 3% |
Agnes Khyn | 9/10 | 3001 days | 3% |
Madi | 8/10 | 3030 days | 2% |
Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 3101 days | 2% |
Jessica Stokes | 9/10 | 3180 days | 2% |
Lauren Roitman | 8/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
Kathy Hart | 7/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3252 days | 2% |
Connie Hopper | 8/10 | 3267 days | 2% |
Anna Carins | 8/10 | 3276 days | 2% |
Max | 8/10 | 3289 days | 2% |
Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3304 days | 2% |
Tatiana Rochereau | 8/10 | 3320 days | 2% |
Berenike Wissinger | 10/10 | 3321 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 7/10 | 3325 days | 2% |
Lauren | 2/10 | 3339 days | 1% |
Juste B | 9/10 | 3365 days | 2% |
Jo Batt | 9/10 | 3406 days | 2% |
Caro G | 9/10 | 3437 days | 2% |
Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3445 days | 2% |
Chantal Heemink | 9/10 | 3448 days | 2% |
Mitchell Henderson | 7/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
Wyklicky | 7/10 | 3650 days | 1% |
Jess Rose | 9/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
Sebastian Sanne | 8/10 | 3720 days | 1% |
Maggie Tobar | 8/10 | 3721 days | 1% |
Claude Nobs | 10/10 | 3724 days | 1% |
Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 3754 days | 1% |
Cora and Franzi | 6/10 | 3758 days | 1% |
Manuela | 8/10 | 3763 days | 1% |
Sidney Stokkers | 6/10 | 3797 days | 1% |
Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 6/10 | 3920 days | 1% |
Anna Grafenstein | 9/10 | 4007 days | 0% |
Karolina Gren | 9/10 | 4011 days | 0% |
Katarina | 10/10 | 4013 days | 0% |
James Betz | 9/10 | 4013 days | 0% |
Simeon W | 6/10 | 4024 days | 0% |
Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 4026 days | 0% |
Frederieke | 10/10 | 4026 days | 0% |
Julian | 8/10 | 4026 days | 0% |
Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
Marinette | 9/10 | 4057 days | 0% |
Barbara | 9/10 | 4057 days | 0% |
Natalie Boehm | 9/10 | 4058 days | 0% |
Jean Batiste Le meur | 4/10 | 4090 days | 0% |
Shay Sofer | 8/10 | 4091 days | 0% |
Doran Swartz | 8/10 | 4091 days | 0% |
arnaud paquet | 9/10 | 4101 days | 1% |
Claudia | 8/10 | 4104 days | 0% |
Hannah | 9/10 | 4132 days | 0% |
Julian Kemp | 9/10 | 4162 days | 0% |
Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4193 days | 0% |
kimbeveridge | 9/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
Luise Fuchs | 10/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
Judith & John Bishop | 8/10 | 4741 days | 1% |
hammone | 9/10 | 4863 days | 1% |
John Hensman | 6/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
Jacqueline Comer | 6/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
Rissa W | 8/10 | 5166 days | 1% |
Lukas Blaauw | 9/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Albert Town Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
4.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.