Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Albert Town Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
155 Valid Reviews
The Albert Town Camping Ground experience has a total of 158 reviews. There are 155 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 155 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 46 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 14 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
77.16% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground valid reviews is 77.16% and is based on 155 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 155 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.42% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Albert Town Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 80.42% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
78.21%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 8/10 | 37 days | 99% |
| Sol | 9/10 | 99 days | 100% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 129 days | 99% |
| James Bendun | 7/10 | 160 days | 93% |
| jo | 7/10 | 313 days | 89% |
| laurie M haysom | 9/10 | 313 days | 95% |
| Jacinta | 7/10 | 343 days | 88% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 343 days | 93% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 343 days | 95% |
| Marguerite | 10/10 | 374 days | 93% |
| Laurie | 8/10 | 374 days | 92% |
| Harry | 6/10 | 402 days | 79% |
| Frances | 4/10 | 402 days | 60% |
| Oscar | 5/10 | 433 days | 69% |
| Dora | 10/10 | 433 days | 91% |
| Ellen | 10/10 | 464 days | 89% |
| Sandy Penny | 1/10 | 464 days | 36% |
| golden menu | 9/10 | 494 days | 87% |
| Jen | 10/10 | 494 days | 87% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 494 days | 86% |
| Ellie | 10/10 | 525 days | 86% |
| Aaron | 5/10 | 525 days | 65% |
| Keith Fitzgerald | 8/10 | 525 days | 84% |
| Helene | 3/10 | 739 days | 38% |
| Christophe | 7/10 | 739 days | 65% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 739 days | 70% |
| Madge | 7/10 | 799 days | 60% |
| max | 10/10 | 799 days | 65% |
| Jo | 8/10 | 799 days | 63% |
| Maren | 8/10 | 830 days | 60% |
| Agnete | 10/10 | 830 days | 62% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 8/10 | 860 days | 58% |
| SK camper | 1/10 | 860 days | 24% |
| Cholly | 7/10 | 891 days | 52% |
| Dylan | 7/10 | 952 days | 46% |
| Etoile Rose | 8/10 | 1044 days | 40% |
| Niff | 8/10 | 1074 days | 37% |
| Vicky | 7/10 | 1105 days | 33% |
| Julia | 5/10 | 1164 days | 23% |
| Vish | 6/10 | 1164 days | 26% |
| Chris | 8/10 | 1164 days | 30% |
| Charlotte Houël | 8/10 | 1164 days | 30% |
| Maxime Dube | 5/10 | 1164 days | 23% |
| Arnon Meshoulam | 6/10 | 1195 days | 24% |
| Hanna | 1/10 | 1195 days | 11% |
| Becky | 6/10 | 1225 days | 22% |
| Caolan Harvey | 8/10 | 1225 days | 25% |
| Lewis | 6/10 | 1439 days | 12% |
| James | 8/10 | 1470 days | 12% |
| Suzanne | 9/10 | 1774 days | 5% |
| Sierra | 3/10 | 1804 days | 3% |
| Rich | 9/10 | 1894 days | 5% |
| Sophia | 9/10 | 1925 days | 5% |
| Dan | 6/10 | 1955 days | 4% |
| Lydia | 10/10 | 1955 days | 5% |
| Cam | 8/10 | 2016 days | 5% |
| Linda | 7/10 | 2200 days | 4% |
| Maria | 6/10 | 2200 days | 4% |
| Antonio | 10/10 | 2229 days | 4% |
| Drew | 6/10 | 2260 days | 4% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2260 days | 4% |
| Jason | 9/10 | 2260 days | 4% |
| Lauren Smith | 10/10 | 2352 days | 4% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 2352 days | 4% |
| Ashley | 4/10 | 2413 days | 3% |
| Alfie | 9/10 | 2413 days | 4% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 2444 days | 4% |
| ScoutnIndi | 8/10 | 2474 days | 4% |
| Rebecca | 8/10 | 2535 days | 4% |
| JirkaR | 8/10 | 2566 days | 4% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2566 days | 3% |
| Marty | 4/10 | 2594 days | 2% |
| Warrick | 2/10 | 2594 days | 2% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2625 days | 3% |
| Zoe | 7/10 | 2625 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2625 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 8/10 | 2656 days | 3% |
| Henk Sjon | 7/10 | 2656 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 10/10 | 2685 days | 3% |
| Robin Norris | 10/10 | 2686 days | 3% |
| Sebaten | 9/10 | 2686 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 7/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
| Andres | 9/10 | 2778 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 10/10 | 2931 days | 3% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 5/10 | 2957 days | 1% |
| Meijerelske | 8/10 | 2996 days | 3% |
| Nadene Wheatley | 5/10 | 3047 days | 2% |
| Laura Delaney | 9/10 | 3068 days | 3% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3085 days | 3% |
| Calo Taranto | 7/10 | 3126 days | 2% |
| Alex Umbers | 8/10 | 3180 days | 2% |
| Judy Aspinall | 8/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
| Julie Yu | 10/10 | 3280 days | 2% |
| Emily Livesey | 8/10 | 3285 days | 2% |
| Jos Tolboom | 8/10 | 3350 days | 2% |
| Agnes Khyn | 9/10 | 3351 days | 2% |
| Madi | 8/10 | 3380 days | 1% |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 3451 days | 2% |
| Jessica Stokes | 9/10 | 3530 days | 2% |
| Lauren Roitman | 8/10 | 3599 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 7/10 | 3599 days | 1% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3602 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 8/10 | 3617 days | 1% |
| Anna Carins | 8/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
| Max | 8/10 | 3639 days | 1% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3654 days | 1% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 8/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| Berenike Wissinger | 10/10 | 3671 days | 1% |
| Stephan Friedrich | 7/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Lauren | 2/10 | 3689 days | 1% |
| Juste B | 9/10 | 3715 days | 1% |
| Jo Batt | 9/10 | 3756 days | 1% |
| Caro G | 9/10 | 3787 days | 1% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
| Chantal Heemink | 9/10 | 3798 days | 1% |
| Mitchell Henderson | 7/10 | 3872 days | 1% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Jess Rose | 9/10 | 4054 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Sanne | 8/10 | 4070 days | 1% |
| Maggie Tobar | 8/10 | 4071 days | 1% |
| Claude Nobs | 10/10 | 4074 days | 1% |
| Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 4104 days | 1% |
| Cora and Franzi | 6/10 | 4108 days | 0% |
| Manuela | 8/10 | 4113 days | 0% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 6/10 | 4146 days | 0% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 6/10 | 4270 days | 0% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 9/10 | 4357 days | 0% |
| Karolina Gren | 9/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Katarina | 10/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| James Betz | 9/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Simeon W | 6/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Frederieke | 10/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Julian | 8/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Carolin Kettler | 9/10 | 4406 days | 1% |
| Marinette | 9/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
| Natalie Boehm | 9/10 | 4408 days | 1% |
| Jean Batiste Le meur | 4/10 | 4440 days | 0% |
| Shay Sofer | 8/10 | 4441 days | 1% |
| Doran Swartz | 8/10 | 4441 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 9/10 | 4451 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 8/10 | 4454 days | 1% |
| Hannah | 9/10 | 4482 days | 1% |
| Julian Kemp | 9/10 | 4512 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4543 days | 1% |
| kimbeveridge | 9/10 | 4726 days | 1% |
| Luise Fuchs | 10/10 | 4747 days | 1% |
| Judith & John Bishop | 8/10 | 5091 days | 1% |
| hammone | 9/10 | 5213 days | 1% |
| John Hensman | 6/10 | 5492 days | 1% |
| Jacqueline Comer | 6/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
| Rissa W | 8/10 | 5516 days | 1% |
| Lukas Blaauw | 9/10 | 5840 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Albert Town Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.53% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.