Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ahuriri Bridge Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
49 Valid Reviews
The Ahuriri Bridge Campsite experience has a total of 49 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 49 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
12% |
| 8/10 | 15 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
24% |
| 6/10 | 8 |
|
16% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
72.24% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ahuriri Bridge Campsite valid reviews is 72.24% and is based on 49 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
72.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alan and Helen | 7/10 | 153 days | 100% |
| Stuff | 9/10 | 395 days | 98% |
| Emma | 6/10 | 426 days | 84% |
| Fabian | 8/10 | 457 days | 94% |
| Holly | 6/10 | 671 days | 70% |
| moondancer | 7/10 | 792 days | 65% |
| Amy Fortin-Barrette | 7/10 | 1037 days | 41% |
| Hannah L | 10/10 | 1157 days | 33% |
| Brigette | 4/10 | 1157 days | 22% |
| Tom | 7/10 | 1157 days | 31% |
| Rugby | 5/10 | 1249 days | 20% |
| Lewis | 6/10 | 1432 days | 13% |
| Lisa | 7/10 | 1522 days | 10% |
| Johnboy | 8/10 | 1583 days | 9% |
| $p | 4/10 | 1797 days | 4% |
| Valg | 8/10 | 1856 days | 5% |
| Lydia | 8/10 | 1948 days | 5% |
| Phil | 10/10 | 1979 days | 5% |
| Edward | 8/10 | 2009 days | 5% |
| Linda | 7/10 | 2193 days | 4% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2253 days | 4% |
| Kieron | 5/10 | 2467 days | 3% |
| Mike | 6/10 | 2618 days | 3% |
| JT | 9/10 | 2618 days | 4% |
| Andy Bond | 7/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Andres | 9/10 | 2771 days | 3% |
| Chelsea | 6/10 | 2832 days | 3% |
| Candy | 6/10 | 2893 days | 3% |
| Saleena Ham | 5/10 | 2893 days | 2% |
| Kat | 7/10 | 2924 days | 3% |
| Lauren Glass | 9/10 | 2924 days | 3% |
| Lizzie V | 7/10 | 2983 days | 3% |
| Troels Karlsen | 9/10 | 2985 days | 3% |
| Maryline Salter | 8/10 | 3019 days | 3% |
| Sandra Jeffers | 8/10 | 3060 days | 3% |
| Kerry Lee | 7/10 | 3288 days | 2% |
| H Harcourt | 7/10 | 3392 days | 2% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 3606 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 8/10 | 3654 days | 1% |
| Josie Suska | 8/10 | 3658 days | 1% |
| Jacqui Hutchins | 5/10 | 3693 days | 1% |
| Sarah Dial | 9/10 | 3714 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 6/10 | 4020 days | 1% |
| Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com | 8/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| Mike Fricker | 6/10 | 4354 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 8/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 8/10 | 4445 days | 1% |
| Jade Fleming | 8/10 | 4536 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 8/10 | 4840 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Ahuriri Bridge Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
5.87% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.