Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Caroline Bay.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Caroline Bay

Valid Reviews

52 Valid Reviews

The Caroline Bay experience has a total of 52 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 52 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 12
23%
9/10 12
23%
8/10 12
23%
7/10 7
13%
6/10 5
10%
5/10 2
4%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
2%

80.19% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Caroline Bay valid reviews is 80.19% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

82.74%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Sebastian 7/10 31 days 97%
Glenda 1/10 61 days 42%
Ann 9/10 245 days 100%
Tom B 8/10 274 days 98%
Drew 3/10 274 days 54%
Tine Warner 10/10 305 days 99%
Nicole Zathey 10/10 305 days 99%
Carolyn 9/10 336 days 97%
tortuga 8/10 366 days 95%
Susan 9/10 489 days 89%
Daisy 8/10 611 days 81%
Matthew 10/10 611 days 82%
AMR 10/10 670 days 78%
Tom 9/10 670 days 77%
Rugby 8/10 762 days 68%
Cem P T 8/10 854 days 60%
Jenny 8/10 945 days 50%
Julie Hampton 10/10 1066 days 39%
EvaBelle 6/10 1066 days 34%
Felipe 5/10 1219 days 21%
Dr.A 10/10 1341 days 19%
Ray 8/10 1369 days 17%
Daniel 10/10 1492 days 12%
Karin 6/10 1735 days 5%
Lua 10/10 1797 days 5%
FZ 8/10 1797 days 5%
EmStems 7/10 1888 days 5%
Tarsha 5/10 1919 days 4%
Keith & Kay Finlayson 10/10 1919 days 5%
Arndt 9/10 1950 days 5%
Aaron 10/10 2011 days 5%
Brice 6/10 2072 days 4%
Therese 10/10 2100 days 4%
Flying Kiwi 9/10 2131 days 4%
Mike Fricker 7/10 2223 days 4%
Greg Southcombe 8/10 2315 days 4%
Cefa 8/10 2376 days 4%
Jill Grimwood 9/10 2457 days 2%
Jo Dawson 7/10 2696 days 3%
Greg 9/10 2738 days 3%
Harriet Smith 9/10 2793 days 3%
Christine Hurring 9/10 2936 days 3%
Beth Goodrich 8/10 3026 days 3%
Daniel Campbell 7/10 3113 days 2%
Jan mentink 7/10 3360 days 2%
Andreas Knipper 6/10 3373 days 2%
Nyla and Alan Ramsay 9/10 3532 days 2%
Lindsay Berquist 10/10 3837 days 1%
Jade Fleming 7/10 4049 days 0%
Armand Poulain 6/10 4269 days 0%
geoffs 9/10 4506 days 1%
Kirbyfamily 8/10 4597 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Caroline Bay does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.31% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.