Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Balmoral Recreation Reserve Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Balmoral Recreation Reserve Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

31 Valid Reviews

The Balmoral Recreation Reserve Camping Ground experience has a total of 31 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 31 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
29%
9/10 8
26%
8/10 10
32%
7/10 3
10%
6/10 1
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.77% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Balmoral Recreation Reserve Camping Ground valid reviews is 86.77% and is based on 31 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

6 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 31 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
33%
9/10 1
17%
8/10 2
33%
7/10 1
17%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Balmoral Recreation Reserve Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 86.67% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.66%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Mike Fricker 10/10 136 days 100%
Tiffndoll 9/10 257 days 96%
Laura 10/10 591 days 81%
Mitch 9/10 1352 days 18%
Fuduca 8/10 1474 days 12%
Jamie 7/10 1687 days 6%
Kyle 10/10 1749 days 5%
Fusako Millin 10/10 1810 days 5%
Jenny and Barry 8/10 1840 days 5%
Marinette Kegels 10/10 2083 days 4%
Lance 9/10 2175 days 4%
Mike 10/10 2358 days 4%
Anna 8/10 2389 days 4%
Philip Grose 7/10 2393 days 4%
Oceane Imber 10/10 2443 days 4%
Marius 9/10 2465 days 4%
Bec 8/10 2470 days 4%
Igor 8/10 2727 days 3%
V M Pasione 9/10 2763 days 3%
Erich Brueggermann 6/10 2777 days 3%
Lenka Pruherova 8/10 2824 days 3%
Graham Taylor 8/10 2957 days 3%
Eddie Overington 9/10 3083 days 2%
Esther M 8/10 3129 days 2%
Maria Bekker 9/10 3247 days 2%
Bex Hyland 10/10 3859 days 1%
Sian Bolderson 8/10 4198 days 0%
Jackie and Brian 8/10 4297 days 0%
John & Vicki 7/10 4687 days 0%
Miriam 10/10 4939 days 1%
Manuela Manns 9/10 4959 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Balmoral Recreation Reserve Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.57% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

94%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.