Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Argyle.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Argyle

Valid Reviews

16 Valid Reviews

The Lake Argyle experience has a total of 16 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 1
6%
9/10 3
19%
8/10 5
31%
7/10 3
19%
6/10 1
6%
5/10 1
6%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 1
6%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
6%

70.63% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Argyle valid reviews is 70.63% and is based on 16 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

69.05%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Lau 3/10 209 days 63%
Annie 10/10 545 days 100%
D vd W 7/10 606 days 88%
Graham 7/10 696 days 81%
Celine 1/10 726 days 32%
Julia 7/10 726 days 78%
Casey Bond 8/10 726 days 82%
Valg 6/10 1364 days 15%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2035 days 3%
Maggie 8/10 2036 days 3%
Rob & Colleen Elwood 9/10 2094 days 3%
Ambili 9/10 2218 days 2%
Ryan Grady 5/10 2815 days 0%
Mary Irvine 8/10 2842 days 1%
Russell Opland 8/10 3110 days 0%
Peter Bursch 8/10 3199 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Argyle does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

7.55% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

77%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.