G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Little Waipa Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
58 Valid Reviews
The Little Waipa Reserve experience has a total of 60 reviews. There are 58 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 58 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 58 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 24 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 13 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
84.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Little Waipa Reserve valid reviews is 84.66% and is based on 58 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
86.56%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Schindelmann | 10/10 | 53 days | 100% |
| Rebecca P | 8/10 | 206 days | 96% |
| Simon | 9/10 | 236 days | 96% |
| Elk | 8/10 | 387 days | 90% |
| Ersin | 9/10 | 418 days | 89% |
| Louise | 10/10 | 662 days | 75% |
| Trevor | 4/10 | 693 days | 48% |
| Doriane | 9/10 | 722 days | 70% |
| Jade Ballantine | 10/10 | 784 days | 65% |
| Jost | 10/10 | 784 days | 65% |
| Mandy | 10/10 | 784 days | 65% |
| 117izy | 6/10 | 814 days | 54% |
| Maartje | 8/10 | 875 days | 55% |
| Benjamin | 9/10 | 875 days | 56% |
| Matthew | 8/10 | 906 days | 52% |
| RM | 9/10 | 967 days | 47% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 998 days | 44% |
| Nicolas | 7/10 | 1087 days | 34% |
| Nikos | 8/10 | 1087 days | 35% |
| Louisa Runge | 7/10 | 1087 days | 34% |
| Janae c | 7/10 | 1118 days | 31% |
| Lukyzee | 9/10 | 1118 days | 33% |
| GRANMA | 10/10 | 1179 days | 29% |
| Max maxwell | 10/10 | 1483 days | 12% |
| Olga | 7/10 | 1483 days | 11% |
| Time Out | 9/10 | 1940 days | 5% |
| Allen Goodall | 10/10 | 2214 days | 4% |
| Rod Brown | 10/10 | 2520 days | 4% |
| John Plane | 10/10 | 2579 days | 4% |
| Roland Hänni | 8/10 | 2610 days | 3% |
| Alyson Reid | 7/10 | 2927 days | 3% |
| Haley Everitt | 3/10 | 3172 days | 1% |
| Helen Quirk | 9/10 | 3273 days | 2% |
| Alison Males | 4/10 | 3307 days | 1% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 3309 days | 2% |
| Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 3309 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3493 days | 2% |
| Lauren Smith | 10/10 | 3512 days | 2% |
| Denise Farr | 10/10 | 3516 days | 2% |
| Wiola and Nico | 1/10 | 3537 days | 1% |
| Trent Davis | 9/10 | 3575 days | 2% |
| Fernando Silva | 9/10 | 3586 days | 2% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
| Vernesa Smolcic | 10/10 | 3669 days | 1% |
| Bryant Faaola | 7/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Miaomace | 10/10 | 3712 days | 1% |
| Victoria | 10/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 9/10 | 3981 days | 1% |
| Ines | 7/10 | 4012 days | 1% |
| John Treasure | 6/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Jordan and Marielle | 10/10 | 4405 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4497 days | 1% |
| Rosa Fossi | 10/10 | 4527 days | 1% |
| Memain | 7/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
| Konza | 6/10 | 4678 days | 0% |
| Clive | 9/10 | 4739 days | 1% |
| Andrew K | 10/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
| hoppy | 9/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Little Waipa Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.53% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.