G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Fullers Bay Of Islands.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
114 Valid Reviews
The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has a total of 115 reviews. There are 114 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 114 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 21 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 28 |
|
25% |
8/10 | 39 |
|
34% |
7/10 | 16 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fullers Bay Of Islands valid reviews is 82.11% and is based on 114 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
109 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 114 valid reviews, the experience has 109 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 109 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 20 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 27 |
|
25% |
8/10 | 38 |
|
35% |
7/10 | 15 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fullers Bay Of Islands face-to-face reviews is 82.20% and is based on 109 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
83.54%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Alexandra Luerner | 10/10 | 3045 days | 100% |
Magali Schwantke | 10/10 | 3303 days | 77% |
Hana Rachfalik | 9/10 | 3311 days | 75% |
Liam Bates | 10/10 | 3322 days | 75% |
Rahel Baufeld | 8/10 | 3328 days | 72% |
Lea Behnem | 8/10 | 3332 days | 72% |
Marlene Goecke | 9/10 | 3339 days | 72% |
Felix Sternke | 7/10 | 3350 days | 66% |
Timon Streicher | 10/10 | 3365 days | 71% |
Suzanne Vermeulen | 7/10 | 3471 days | 56% |
Kristina Farkas | 10/10 | 3701 days | 40% |
Martha Taatz | 10/10 | 3720 days | 39% |
Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 3767 days | 33% |
Hadler | 9/10 | 4052 days | 8% |
Christine Helleiner | 10/10 | 4052 days | 9% |
Ian Garner | 10/10 | 4064 days | 8% |
Dieter Hirsch | 8/10 | 4116 days | 2% |
Ken S | 10/10 | 4141 days | 1% |
Katrina Gamby | 9/10 | 4428 days | 25% |
Peter Moederer | 8/10 | 4433 days | 24% |
Dick Kooij | 8/10 | 4488 days | 24% |
Tony Hines | 8/10 | 4492 days | 24% |
Hans | 8/10 | 4496 days | 24% |
Urs Zuercher | 9/10 | 4511 days | 25% |
Judy | 9/10 | 4515 days | 25% |
Stevie | 8/10 | 4518 days | 24% |
Thys | 8/10 | 4518 days | 24% |
Adrian Weidell | 7/10 | 4711 days | 22% |
Peter Kent | 10/10 | 4768 days | 25% |
Helmut Schmid | 9/10 | 4775 days | 25% |
V deLeeuw | 9/10 | 4777 days | 25% |
Roy Barton | 9/10 | 4778 days | 25% |
M H Hansen | 8/10 | 4793 days | 24% |
Sabine | 9/10 | 4793 days | 25% |
A Sorg | 10/10 | 4802 days | 25% |
Leander Siegert | 8/10 | 4808 days | 24% |
John & Myra Sloan | 9/10 | 4881 days | 25% |
Andy Lever | 9/10 | 4887 days | 25% |
Marianne Wheatley | 8/10 | 5135 days | 24% |
Aimee Pollett | 9/10 | 5137 days | 25% |
Tina Baun | 8/10 | 5139 days | 24% |
Julia Hofstetter | 6/10 | 5140 days | 19% |
Scheauwen | 4/10 | 5145 days | 9% |
Shirley | 8/10 | 5145 days | 24% |
Henrik Mundbuerg | 10/10 | 5151 days | 25% |
Mike and Sue Clark | 2/10 | 5153 days | 0% |
Dave and Emma | 7/10 | 5163 days | 22% |
Rosey834 | 8/10 | 5237 days | 24% |
David | 7/10 | 5445 days | 22% |
kempt | 6/10 | 5451 days | 19% |
Russ Turner | 9/10 | 5498 days | 25% |
Remro | 8/10 | 5500 days | 24% |
Rob & Anne | 9/10 | 5505 days | 25% |
Pam Know | 8/10 | 5507 days | 24% |
Gunda G | 10/10 | 5520 days | 25% |
Denecke Thorsten | 8/10 | 5521 days | 24% |
Jakob Pedersen | 9/10 | 5522 days | 25% |
Lynn Tichauer | 7/10 | 5523 days | 22% |
Malcolm Glad | 7/10 | 5525 days | 22% |
Mathias Skov | 7/10 | 5526 days | 22% |
Mick Thexton | 9/10 | 5535 days | 25% |
Torsten Gehrke | 5/10 | 5557 days | 14% |
Werner Swiss | 10/10 | 5562 days | 25% |
gemmav | 8/10 | 5586 days | 24% |
nadinef | 9/10 | 5594 days | 25% |
Anne Ford | 8/10 | 5604 days | 24% |
Lothar Riedmann | 7/10 | 5604 days | 22% |
Sibylle Locher | 8/10 | 5610 days | 24% |
Mike | 8/10 | 5614 days | 24% |
godineau | 8/10 | 5728 days | 24% |
katesh | 10/10 | 5801 days | 25% |
CeesVanW | 9/10 | 5846 days | 25% |
arthurwa | 10/10 | 5846 days | 25% |
Jake1 | 7/10 | 5848 days | 22% |
Peter Jackie | 9/10 | 5849 days | 25% |
Gerd Hebbel | 8/10 | 5862 days | 24% |
HeideS | 9/10 | 5865 days | 25% |
Kate | 8/10 | 5869 days | 24% |
Keith | 8/10 | 5870 days | 24% |
ChristopherD | 9/10 | 5880 days | 25% |
Green | 8/10 | 5886 days | 24% |
Philip | 7/10 | 5895 days | 22% |
Katy | 4/10 | 5896 days | 9% |
Andrew | 8/10 | 5896 days | 24% |
Nikolaj | 7/10 | 5896 days | 22% |
KuntzGermany | 10/10 | 5901 days | 25% |
Klalis | 8/10 | 5902 days | 24% |
MartinD | 7/10 | 5904 days | 22% |
Van Dam | 10/10 | 5908 days | 25% |
Hans | 7/10 | 5918 days | 22% |
Johann | 10/10 | 5922 days | 25% |
Lynne | 9/10 | 5959 days | 25% |
Heidi | 8/10 | 5961 days | 24% |
Liz | 8/10 | 5985 days | 24% |
Louise | 8/10 | 6009 days | 24% |
Rosseel | 8/10 | 6012 days | 24% |
teamaustria | 6/10 | 6035 days | 19% |
Dave | 5/10 | 6036 days | 14% |
Rebecca Smith | 9/10 | 6061 days | 25% |
Daniela | 8/10 | 6225 days | 24% |
Hoetnagels | 6/10 | 6229 days | 19% |
Leo | 9/10 | 6238 days | 25% |
Amanda | 6/10 | 6244 days | 19% |
Sally and David Wallis | 10/10 | 6246 days | 25% |
Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6260 days | 24% |
Meiki | 9/10 | 6293 days | 25% |
Dave | 8/10 | 6576 days | 24% |
Beth | 10/10 | 6583 days | 25% |
Frederik | 9/10 | 6600 days | 25% |
Lucy | 7/10 | 6609 days | 22% |
Jasper | 8/10 | 6611 days | 24% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6622 days | 24% |
Gordon | 9/10 | 6623 days | 25% |
Harrison | 7/10 | 6624 days | 22% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.70% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 61 days. However the Fullers Bay Of Islands experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.65% |
198 | -3.66% |
199 | -3.68% |
200 | -3.70% |
201 | -3.72% |
202 | -3.74% |
203 | -3.76% |
… | … |
3.05% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.