Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Fullers Bay Of Islands.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
114 Valid Reviews
The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has a total of 115 reviews. There are 114 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 114 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 21 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 28 |
|
25% |
8/10 | 39 |
|
34% |
7/10 | 16 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fullers Bay Of Islands valid reviews is 82.11% and is based on 114 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
109 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 114 valid reviews, the experience has 109 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 109 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 20 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 27 |
|
25% |
8/10 | 38 |
|
35% |
7/10 | 15 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fullers Bay Of Islands face-to-face reviews is 82.20% and is based on 109 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
83.51%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Alexandra Luerner | 10/10 | 3057 days | 100% |
Magali Schwantke | 10/10 | 3315 days | 76% |
Hana Rachfalik | 9/10 | 3323 days | 75% |
Liam Bates | 10/10 | 3334 days | 75% |
Rahel Baufeld | 8/10 | 3340 days | 72% |
Lea Behnem | 8/10 | 3344 days | 72% |
Marlene Goecke | 9/10 | 3351 days | 72% |
Felix Sternke | 7/10 | 3362 days | 66% |
Timon Streicher | 10/10 | 3377 days | 71% |
Suzanne Vermeulen | 7/10 | 3483 days | 55% |
Kristina Farkas | 10/10 | 3713 days | 40% |
Martha Taatz | 10/10 | 3732 days | 38% |
Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 3779 days | 33% |
Hadler | 9/10 | 4064 days | 8% |
Christine Helleiner | 10/10 | 4064 days | 8% |
Ian Garner | 10/10 | 4076 days | 7% |
Dieter Hirsch | 8/10 | 4128 days | 2% |
Ken S | 10/10 | 4153 days | 0% |
Katrina Gamby | 9/10 | 4440 days | 25% |
Peter Moederer | 8/10 | 4445 days | 25% |
Dick Kooij | 8/10 | 4500 days | 25% |
Tony Hines | 8/10 | 4504 days | 25% |
Hans | 8/10 | 4508 days | 25% |
Urs Zuercher | 9/10 | 4523 days | 25% |
Judy | 9/10 | 4527 days | 25% |
Stevie | 8/10 | 4530 days | 25% |
Thys | 8/10 | 4530 days | 25% |
Adrian Weidell | 7/10 | 4723 days | 23% |
Peter Kent | 10/10 | 4780 days | 26% |
Helmut Schmid | 9/10 | 4787 days | 25% |
V deLeeuw | 9/10 | 4789 days | 25% |
Roy Barton | 9/10 | 4790 days | 25% |
M H Hansen | 8/10 | 4805 days | 25% |
Sabine | 9/10 | 4805 days | 25% |
A Sorg | 10/10 | 4814 days | 26% |
Leander Siegert | 8/10 | 4820 days | 25% |
John & Myra Sloan | 9/10 | 4893 days | 25% |
Andy Lever | 9/10 | 4899 days | 25% |
Marianne Wheatley | 8/10 | 5147 days | 25% |
Aimee Pollett | 9/10 | 5149 days | 25% |
Tina Baun | 8/10 | 5151 days | 25% |
Julia Hofstetter | 6/10 | 5152 days | 19% |
Scheauwen | 4/10 | 5157 days | 10% |
Shirley | 8/10 | 5157 days | 25% |
Henrik Mundbuerg | 10/10 | 5163 days | 26% |
Mike and Sue Clark | 2/10 | 5165 days | 1% |
Dave and Emma | 7/10 | 5175 days | 23% |
Rosey834 | 8/10 | 5249 days | 25% |
David | 7/10 | 5457 days | 23% |
kempt | 6/10 | 5463 days | 19% |
Russ Turner | 9/10 | 5510 days | 25% |
Remro | 8/10 | 5512 days | 25% |
Rob & Anne | 9/10 | 5517 days | 25% |
Pam Know | 8/10 | 5519 days | 25% |
Gunda G | 10/10 | 5532 days | 26% |
Denecke Thorsten | 8/10 | 5533 days | 25% |
Jakob Pedersen | 9/10 | 5534 days | 25% |
Lynn Tichauer | 7/10 | 5535 days | 23% |
Malcolm Glad | 7/10 | 5537 days | 23% |
Mathias Skov | 7/10 | 5538 days | 23% |
Mick Thexton | 9/10 | 5547 days | 25% |
Torsten Gehrke | 5/10 | 5569 days | 15% |
Werner Swiss | 10/10 | 5574 days | 26% |
gemmav | 8/10 | 5598 days | 25% |
nadinef | 9/10 | 5606 days | 25% |
Anne Ford | 8/10 | 5616 days | 25% |
Lothar Riedmann | 7/10 | 5616 days | 23% |
Sibylle Locher | 8/10 | 5622 days | 25% |
Mike | 8/10 | 5626 days | 25% |
godineau | 8/10 | 5740 days | 25% |
katesh | 10/10 | 5813 days | 26% |
CeesVanW | 9/10 | 5858 days | 25% |
arthurwa | 10/10 | 5858 days | 26% |
Jake1 | 7/10 | 5860 days | 23% |
Peter Jackie | 9/10 | 5861 days | 25% |
Gerd Hebbel | 8/10 | 5874 days | 25% |
HeideS | 9/10 | 5877 days | 25% |
Kate | 8/10 | 5881 days | 25% |
Keith | 8/10 | 5882 days | 25% |
ChristopherD | 9/10 | 5892 days | 25% |
Green | 8/10 | 5898 days | 25% |
Philip | 7/10 | 5907 days | 23% |
Katy | 4/10 | 5908 days | 10% |
Andrew | 8/10 | 5908 days | 25% |
Nikolaj | 7/10 | 5908 days | 23% |
KuntzGermany | 10/10 | 5913 days | 26% |
Klalis | 8/10 | 5914 days | 25% |
MartinD | 7/10 | 5916 days | 23% |
Van Dam | 10/10 | 5920 days | 26% |
Hans | 7/10 | 5930 days | 23% |
Johann | 10/10 | 5934 days | 26% |
Lynne | 9/10 | 5971 days | 25% |
Heidi | 8/10 | 5973 days | 25% |
Liz | 8/10 | 5997 days | 25% |
Louise | 8/10 | 6022 days | 25% |
Rosseel | 8/10 | 6024 days | 25% |
teamaustria | 6/10 | 6047 days | 19% |
Dave | 5/10 | 6048 days | 15% |
Rebecca Smith | 9/10 | 6073 days | 25% |
Daniela | 8/10 | 6237 days | 25% |
Hoetnagels | 6/10 | 6241 days | 19% |
Leo | 9/10 | 6250 days | 25% |
Amanda | 6/10 | 6256 days | 19% |
Sally and David Wallis | 10/10 | 6258 days | 26% |
Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6272 days | 25% |
Meiki | 9/10 | 6305 days | 25% |
Dave | 8/10 | 6588 days | 25% |
Beth | 10/10 | 6595 days | 26% |
Frederik | 9/10 | 6612 days | 25% |
Lucy | 7/10 | 6621 days | 23% |
Jasper | 8/10 | 6623 days | 25% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 6634 days | 25% |
Gordon | 9/10 | 6635 days | 25% |
Harrison | 7/10 | 6636 days | 23% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.46% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 66 days. However the Fullers Bay Of Islands experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.41% |
198 | -3.43% |
199 | -3.45% |
200 | -3.46% |
201 | -3.48% |
202 | -3.50% |
203 | -3.52% |
… | … |
2.99% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.