G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Fullers Bay Of Islands.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Fullers Bay Of Islands
Valid Reviews
114 Valid Reviews
The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has a total of 115 reviews. There are 114 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 114 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 28 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 39 |
|
34% |
| 7/10 | 16 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fullers Bay Of Islands valid reviews is 82.11% and is based on 114 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
109 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 114 valid reviews, the experience has 109 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 109 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 20 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 38 |
|
35% |
| 7/10 | 15 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Fullers Bay Of Islands face-to-face reviews is 82.20% and is based on 109 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
83.83%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Luerner | 10/10 | 2913 days | 100% |
| Magali Schwantke | 10/10 | 3171 days | 82% |
| Hana Rachfalik | 9/10 | 3179 days | 81% |
| Liam Bates | 10/10 | 3190 days | 81% |
| Rahel Baufeld | 8/10 | 3196 days | 79% |
| Lea Behnem | 8/10 | 3200 days | 79% |
| Marlene Goecke | 9/10 | 3207 days | 79% |
| Felix Sternke | 7/10 | 3218 days | 74% |
| Timon Streicher | 10/10 | 3233 days | 78% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 7/10 | 3339 days | 66% |
| Kristina Farkas | 10/10 | 3569 days | 55% |
| Martha Taatz | 10/10 | 3588 days | 54% |
| Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 3635 days | 50% |
| Hadler | 9/10 | 3920 days | 31% |
| Christine Helleiner | 10/10 | 3920 days | 31% |
| Ian Garner | 10/10 | 3932 days | 30% |
| Dieter Hirsch | 8/10 | 3984 days | 26% |
| Ken S | 10/10 | 4009 days | 25% |
| Katrina Gamby | 9/10 | 4296 days | 6% |
| Peter Moederer | 8/10 | 4301 days | 5% |
| Dick Kooij | 8/10 | 4356 days | 2% |
| Tony Hines | 8/10 | 4360 days | 1% |
| Hans | 8/10 | 4364 days | 1% |
| Urs Zuercher | 9/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
| Judy | 9/10 | 4383 days | 34% |
| Stevie | 8/10 | 4386 days | 34% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 4386 days | 34% |
| Adrian Weidell | 7/10 | 4579 days | 32% |
| Peter Kent | 10/10 | 4636 days | 35% |
| Helmut Schmid | 9/10 | 4643 days | 34% |
| V deLeeuw | 9/10 | 4645 days | 34% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 4646 days | 34% |
| M H Hansen | 8/10 | 4661 days | 34% |
| Sabine | 9/10 | 4661 days | 34% |
| A Sorg | 10/10 | 4670 days | 35% |
| Leander Siegert | 8/10 | 4676 days | 34% |
| John & Myra Sloan | 9/10 | 4749 days | 34% |
| Andy Lever | 9/10 | 4755 days | 34% |
| Marianne Wheatley | 8/10 | 5003 days | 34% |
| Aimee Pollett | 9/10 | 5005 days | 34% |
| Tina Baun | 8/10 | 5007 days | 34% |
| Julia Hofstetter | 6/10 | 5008 days | 30% |
| Scheauwen | 4/10 | 5013 days | 23% |
| Shirley | 8/10 | 5013 days | 34% |
| Henrik Mundbuerg | 10/10 | 5019 days | 35% |
| Mike and Sue Clark | 2/10 | 5021 days | 16% |
| Dave and Emma | 7/10 | 5031 days | 32% |
| Rosey834 | 8/10 | 5105 days | 34% |
| David | 7/10 | 5313 days | 32% |
| kempt | 6/10 | 5319 days | 30% |
| Russ Turner | 9/10 | 5366 days | 34% |
| Remro | 8/10 | 5368 days | 34% |
| Rob & Anne | 9/10 | 5373 days | 34% |
| Pam Know | 8/10 | 5375 days | 34% |
| Gunda G | 10/10 | 5388 days | 35% |
| Denecke Thorsten | 8/10 | 5389 days | 34% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 9/10 | 5390 days | 34% |
| Lynn Tichauer | 7/10 | 5391 days | 32% |
| Malcolm Glad | 7/10 | 5393 days | 32% |
| Mathias Skov | 7/10 | 5394 days | 32% |
| Mick Thexton | 9/10 | 5403 days | 34% |
| Torsten Gehrke | 5/10 | 5425 days | 27% |
| Werner Swiss | 10/10 | 5430 days | 35% |
| gemmav | 8/10 | 5454 days | 34% |
| nadinef | 9/10 | 5462 days | 34% |
| Anne Ford | 8/10 | 5472 days | 34% |
| Lothar Riedmann | 7/10 | 5472 days | 32% |
| Sibylle Locher | 8/10 | 5478 days | 34% |
| Mike | 8/10 | 5482 days | 34% |
| godineau | 8/10 | 5596 days | 34% |
| katesh | 10/10 | 5669 days | 35% |
| CeesVanW | 9/10 | 5714 days | 34% |
| arthurwa | 10/10 | 5714 days | 35% |
| Jake1 | 7/10 | 5716 days | 32% |
| Peter Jackie | 9/10 | 5717 days | 34% |
| Gerd Hebbel | 8/10 | 5730 days | 34% |
| HeideS | 9/10 | 5733 days | 34% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 5737 days | 34% |
| Keith | 8/10 | 5738 days | 34% |
| ChristopherD | 9/10 | 5748 days | 34% |
| Green | 8/10 | 5754 days | 34% |
| Philip | 7/10 | 5763 days | 32% |
| Katy | 4/10 | 5764 days | 23% |
| Andrew | 8/10 | 5764 days | 34% |
| Nikolaj | 7/10 | 5764 days | 32% |
| KuntzGermany | 10/10 | 5769 days | 35% |
| Klalis | 8/10 | 5770 days | 34% |
| MartinD | 7/10 | 5772 days | 32% |
| Van Dam | 10/10 | 5776 days | 35% |
| Hans | 7/10 | 5786 days | 32% |
| Johann | 10/10 | 5790 days | 35% |
| Lynne | 9/10 | 5827 days | 34% |
| Heidi | 8/10 | 5829 days | 34% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 5853 days | 34% |
| Louise | 8/10 | 5877 days | 34% |
| Rosseel | 8/10 | 5880 days | 34% |
| teamaustria | 6/10 | 5903 days | 30% |
| Dave | 5/10 | 5904 days | 27% |
| Rebecca Smith | 9/10 | 5929 days | 34% |
| Daniela | 8/10 | 6093 days | 34% |
| Hoetnagels | 6/10 | 6097 days | 30% |
| Leo | 9/10 | 6106 days | 34% |
| Amanda | 6/10 | 6112 days | 30% |
| Sally and David Wallis | 10/10 | 6114 days | 35% |
| Roger & Margaret | 8/10 | 6128 days | 34% |
| Meiki | 9/10 | 6161 days | 34% |
| Dave | 8/10 | 6444 days | 34% |
| Beth | 10/10 | 6451 days | 35% |
| Frederik | 9/10 | 6468 days | 34% |
| Lucy | 7/10 | 6477 days | 32% |
| Jasper | 8/10 | 6479 days | 34% |
| Fiona | 8/10 | 6490 days | 34% |
| Gordon | 9/10 | 6491 days | 34% |
| Harrison | 7/10 | 6492 days | 32% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-4.05% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Fullers Bay Of Islands experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Fullers Bay Of Islands experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
3.06% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.