Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Haka Snow Tours.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Haka Snow Tours

Valid Reviews

76 Valid Reviews

The Haka Snow Tours experience has a total of 76 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 76 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 72
95%
9/10 3
4%
8/10 1
1%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

99.34% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Haka Snow Tours valid reviews is 99.34% and is based on 76 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

99.28%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Jeremiah Blanch 10/10 3012 days 100%
Shreddy_Kreuger13 10/10 3012 days 100%
Jill Hayes 10/10 3012 days 100%
Tiina R 10/10 3347 days 71%
Josh S 10/10 3378 days 68%
Aidan Potter 10/10 3378 days 68%
stephen 9/10 3379 days 67%
Michael Woods 10/10 3409 days 66%
Ruth Tan 10/10 3409 days 66%
martin ramsey 10/10 3409 days 66%
steve mcelroy 10/10 3410 days 66%
Ery K 10/10 3439 days 63%
Stavros Mouslopoulos 10/10 3440 days 63%
T D 10/10 3712 days 40%
Gin Di Francesco 10/10 3712 days 40%
Lisa Bransby 10/10 3713 days 39%
Kylie O 10/10 3713 days 39%
Mercedes Zacuto 8/10 3743 days 36%
Jessica Thomas 10/10 3744 days 37%
perina drummond 10/10 3744 days 37%
Jonathan Barnes 10/10 3744 days 37%
Henk Mulder 9/10 3774 days 34%
Andrew Cheney 9/10 3956 days 18%
Sarah Mitchell 10/10 3956 days 18%
NZcrazyskichick 10/10 4109 days 5%
Stoowert 10/10 4140 days 3%
Nathan Douglas 10/10 4140 days 3%
Hefin Llewellyn-Evans 10/10 4140 days 3%
Scott Andersen 10/10 4140 days 3%
Gillian B 10/10 4170 days 0%
Deanna_E 10/10 4443 days 26%
ANIMALMANIA 10/10 4474 days 26%
benepet 10/10 4474 days 26%
cillianrouse 10/10 4474 days 26%
Beatox118 10/10 4474 days 26%
KateyeJ 10/10 4474 days 26%
baconmango 10/10 4474 days 26%
sanguine_bubble 10/10 4505 days 26%
Andrewc 10/10 4505 days 26%
CHOW 10/10 4779 days 26%
Hammo 10/10 4840 days 26%
roswren 10/10 4871 days 26%
Wally21 10/10 4871 days 26%
Thaino 10/10 4871 days 26%
Jaybags 10/10 5174 days 26%
mickey100 10/10 5174 days 26%
mikaaarnio 10/10 5174 days 26%
russ1116 10/10 5205 days 26%
surebuddy 10/10 5205 days 26%
Musdogg20 10/10 5205 days 26%
TristanB 10/10 5205 days 26%
Tony_K 10/10 5205 days 26%
sqwodknuckle 10/10 5205 days 26%
Evilems 10/10 5205 days 26%
skyer 10/10 5236 days 26%
lana 10/10 5236 days 26%
tim 10/10 5236 days 26%
Philcross 10/10 5236 days 26%
zuccs 10/10 5236 days 26%
mickeyo 10/10 5236 days 26%
Kat 10/10 5236 days 26%
Harks 10/10 5236 days 26%
Luise 10/10 5236 days 26%
MelanieClark 10/10 5236 days 26%
myfriendcolin 10/10 5539 days 26%
john rowbottom 10/10 5539 days 26%
Edward Bugg 10/10 5539 days 26%
Cassia Ferguson 10/10 5570 days 26%
Aaron Jones 10/10 5570 days 26%
vanessa koop 10/10 5570 days 26%
Bazza 10/10 5570 days 26%
Robert Aquadro 10/10 5570 days 26%
budgie 10/10 5570 days 26%
rabear 10/10 5570 days 26%
Philip Parle 10/10 5601 days 26%
jnegrete 10/10 5601 days 26%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Haka Snow Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.85% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 50 days. However the Haka Snow Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Haka Snow Tours experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
197 -3.80%
198 -3.82%
199 -3.83%
200 -3.85%
201 -3.87%
202 -3.89%
203 -3.91%

Balancing Adjustment

0.39% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

96%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.