Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Waikawa Recreation Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
45 Valid Reviews
The Waikawa Recreation Reserve experience has a total of 46 reviews. There are 45 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
13% |
9/10 | 13 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
29% |
7/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waikawa Recreation Reserve valid reviews is 81.11% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
6 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 45 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 3 |
|
50% |
8/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.67% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waikawa Recreation Reserve face-to-face reviews is 86.67% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.33%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
missingzuinNZ | 8/10 | 264 days | 100% |
Joel Fryett | 7/10 | 324 days | 93% |
Marie Perret | 8/10 | 446 days | 92% |
Henry | 8/10 | 508 days | 89% |
Kelsey Fisher | 8/10 | 630 days | 81% |
Christine | 9/10 | 781 days | 69% |
Barb Winter | 10/10 | 1207 days | 28% |
Aaron | 7/10 | 1419 days | 14% |
Pablo Boris | 7/10 | 1419 days | 14% |
Jo | 8/10 | 1450 days | 13% |
Aniek | 7/10 | 1785 days | 5% |
Cor Dekker | 8/10 | 1846 days | 5% |
Georgia | 9/10 | 2060 days | 5% |
WideEyedWanderer | 9/10 | 2119 days | 4% |
Mischa | 8/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Claudia | 10/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
Rachel | 10/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 6/10 | 2425 days | 3% |
Benn | 7/10 | 2456 days | 3% |
Jill Grimwood | 9/10 | 2476 days | 2% |
Dana Nunes | 8/10 | 2478 days | 4% |
UK 50-something couple | 8/10 | 2484 days | 4% |
Michael Jayaranjan | 9/10 | 2496 days | 4% |
Vander Plancke Julien | 7/10 | 2568 days | 3% |
Harriet Smith | 8/10 | 2817 days | 3% |
Erich Brueggermann | 6/10 | 2878 days | 2% |
Philippa Buchanan | 9/10 | 3057 days | 2% |
Marina | 9/10 | 3212 days | 2% |
Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 3289 days | 2% |
Reinout Schrijver | 9/10 | 3551 days | 1% |
Benjamin Scherer | 9/10 | 3574 days | 1% |
Kimberley Garrod | 5/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
Joanna Doran | 9/10 | 3635 days | 1% |
Pia Sander | 10/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 7/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
Hanna Liebe | 7/10 | 3900 days | 0% |
Andreas Liebe | 9/10 | 3900 days | 0% |
Joris Giullemot | 9/10 | 3919 days | 0% |
Fraule-Emmanuelle De Rouqmout | 10/10 | 3940 days | 0% |
Steve Warren | 10/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
Florian | 8/10 | 4251 days | 0% |
phudgb | 4/10 | 4433 days | 0% |
Kirbyfamily | 7/10 | 4616 days | 1% |
Jochem Snyders | 8/10 | 4650 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Waikawa Recreation Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.91% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.