G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Waikawa Recreation Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
46 Valid Reviews
The Waikawa Recreation Reserve experience has a total of 47 reviews. There are 46 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
13% |
9/10 | 13 |
|
28% |
8/10 | 14 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.09% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waikawa Recreation Reserve valid reviews is 81.09% and is based on 46 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
6 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 46 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
9/10 | 3 |
|
50% |
8/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.67% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Waikawa Recreation Reserve face-to-face reviews is 86.67% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.26%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Nancy Campbell | 8/10 | 40 days | 100% |
missingzuinNZ | 8/10 | 285 days | 95% |
Joel Fryett | 7/10 | 345 days | 89% |
Marie Perret | 8/10 | 467 days | 88% |
Henry | 8/10 | 529 days | 84% |
Kelsey Fisher | 8/10 | 651 days | 76% |
Christine | 9/10 | 802 days | 64% |
Barb Winter | 10/10 | 1228 days | 26% |
Aaron | 7/10 | 1440 days | 13% |
Pablo Boris | 7/10 | 1440 days | 13% |
Jo | 8/10 | 1471 days | 12% |
Aniek | 7/10 | 1806 days | 5% |
Cor Dekker | 8/10 | 1867 days | 5% |
Georgia | 9/10 | 2081 days | 4% |
WideEyedWanderer | 9/10 | 2140 days | 4% |
Mischa | 8/10 | 2263 days | 4% |
Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2263 days | 4% |
Claudia | 10/10 | 2293 days | 4% |
Rachel | 10/10 | 2355 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 6/10 | 2446 days | 3% |
Benn | 7/10 | 2477 days | 3% |
Jill Grimwood | 9/10 | 2497 days | 2% |
Dana Nunes | 8/10 | 2499 days | 3% |
UK 50-something couple | 8/10 | 2505 days | 3% |
Michael Jayaranjan | 9/10 | 2517 days | 3% |
Vander Plancke Julien | 7/10 | 2589 days | 3% |
Harriet Smith | 8/10 | 2838 days | 3% |
Erich Brueggermann | 6/10 | 2899 days | 2% |
Philippa Buchanan | 9/10 | 3078 days | 2% |
Marina | 9/10 | 3233 days | 2% |
Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 3310 days | 2% |
Reinout Schrijver | 9/10 | 3572 days | 1% |
Benjamin Scherer | 9/10 | 3595 days | 1% |
Kimberley Garrod | 5/10 | 3637 days | 1% |
Joanna Doran | 9/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
Pia Sander | 10/10 | 3662 days | 1% |
Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 7/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
Hanna Liebe | 7/10 | 3921 days | 0% |
Andreas Liebe | 9/10 | 3921 days | 0% |
Joris Giullemot | 9/10 | 3940 days | 0% |
Fraule-Emmanuelle De Rouqmout | 10/10 | 3961 days | 0% |
Steve Warren | 10/10 | 4119 days | 0% |
Florian | 8/10 | 4272 days | 0% |
phudgb | 4/10 | 4454 days | 0% |
Kirbyfamily | 7/10 | 4637 days | 1% |
Jochem Snyders | 8/10 | 4671 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Waikawa Recreation Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.93% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.