G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rays Rest Camping Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
49 Valid Reviews
The Rays Rest Camping Reserve experience has a total of 51 reviews. There are 49 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 49 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
9/10 | 13 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 11 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 7 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rays Rest Camping Reserve valid reviews is 88.57% and is based on 49 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
92.96%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Kev | 10/10 | 45 days | 100% |
Logan | 10/10 | 534 days | 84% |
sarah penney | 10/10 | 625 days | 78% |
ellie | 7/10 | 625 days | 72% |
iona.catley@hotmail.co.uk | 9/10 | 656 days | 75% |
Helen E | 10/10 | 656 days | 76% |
Happy Campers | 10/10 | 807 days | 63% |
Matt | 10/10 | 1021 days | 42% |
Sebastian Stoof | 8/10 | 1111 days | 33% |
Alex | 8/10 | 1264 days | 23% |
Kirsty B | 10/10 | 1445 days | 13% |
Tyler | 9/10 | 1445 days | 13% |
Laura | 10/10 | 1659 days | 7% |
Javier Williams | 10/10 | 1842 days | 5% |
Bakers | 8/10 | 1933 days | 5% |
Kirstie Gallant | 8/10 | 2117 days | 4% |
thong family | 7/10 | 2145 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2145 days | 4% |
Trent | 7/10 | 2268 days | 4% |
Sharon | 9/10 | 2298 days | 4% |
ascotandanaussie | 8/10 | 2451 days | 4% |
Sinkbli | 8/10 | 2482 days | 4% |
Jim Harding | 9/10 | 2496 days | 4% |
Debbie Harding | 8/10 | 2502 days | 4% |
orit almog | 9/10 | 2510 days | 4% |
Eversons | 10/10 | 2510 days | 4% |
Jan Hiltermann | 7/10 | 2580 days | 3% |
Vander Plancke Julien | 7/10 | 2594 days | 3% |
Anna Brzezińska Talaga | 10/10 | 2847 days | 3% |
Gena Bond | 10/10 | 2863 days | 3% |
Jason Stalgis | 9/10 | 2868 days | 3% |
Leigh Dodds | 8/10 | 2994 days | 3% |
Stuart Morgan | 10/10 | 3002 days | 3% |
Laurie | 10/10 | 3003 days | 3% |
Tony Waters | 9/10 | 3028 days | 3% |
Henny Lee | 10/10 | 3100 days | 2% |
renee verwey | 9/10 | 3235 days | 2% |
Ron Mollica | 10/10 | 3272 days | 2% |
Robert Jones | 9/10 | 3319 days | 2% |
Elisabeth Tartler | 10/10 | 3525 days | 2% |
Tony Grantham | 7/10 | 3545 days | 1% |
Ricky Shepherd | 7/10 | 3646 days | 1% |
Garry Renton | 8/10 | 3919 days | 1% |
Alex Artigues | 9/10 | 4005 days | 0% |
Serge Garcin | 9/10 | 4005 days | 0% |
Team Kim&James | 9/10 | 4155 days | 0% |
FlyingKiwiGirl | 8/10 | 4308 days | 0% |
Henry Howard | 10/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
Hanna_Malte | 8/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rays Rest Camping Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.64% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.