Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rangitoto Summit Track.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Rangitoto Summit Track

Valid Reviews

55 Valid Reviews

The Rangitoto Summit Track experience has a total of 55 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 55 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 11
20%
9/10 13
24%
8/10 21
38%
7/10 8
15%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

84.18% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rangitoto Summit Track valid reviews is 84.18% and is based on 55 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

50 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 55 valid reviews, the experience has 50 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
18%
9/10 11
22%
8/10 20
40%
7/10 8
16%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

83.40% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rangitoto Summit Track face-to-face reviews is 83.40% and is based on 50 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

84.56%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Raphaele 10/10 2176 days 100%
C J B 10/10 2359 days 92%
Andreas Zedelius 9/10 2855 days 68%
Alex Hah 7/10 2857 days 64%
Ian Hammond 9/10 2863 days 68%
Marc Perales 8/10 2913 days 65%
Soeren Buchheister 9/10 2919 days 65%
Leonie Brabers 8/10 2929 days 64%
Patricia Trigo 10/10 2938 days 65%
Thomas Le Buzulier 8/10 3160 days 54%
Alexes D 8/10 3161 days 54%
Marina R 8/10 3161 days 54%
Jenny Young 8/10 3170 days 53%
Leonie 7/10 3174 days 50%
Erika Tarant 10/10 3174 days 54%
Mikael Thyselius 8/10 3174 days 53%
Robin Stamm 7/10 3175 days 50%
Marine Lavie 6/10 3179 days 46%
Calum Penn 8/10 3181 days 53%
Lauren Dinnage 10/10 3181 days 54%
Gerrit 8/10 3211 days 52%
Jonas 6/10 3220 days 45%
Adam Taylor 7/10 3222 days 48%
Timon Streicher 8/10 3226 days 51%
Livia and Dave 9/10 3229 days 51%
Jonas Nielsen 9/10 3918 days 20%
Roy Matthieu 8/10 3923 days 20%
Klaus Petersen 10/10 3930 days 20%
Rikke Petersen 9/10 3930 days 19%
Jessie Sabine 7/10 3931 days 18%
Serena Poggioli 7/10 3935 days 18%
Kevin Rainey 9/10 4293 days 3%
Jackie and Brian 8/10 4359 days 0%
Carly Braddock 8/10 4631 days 22%
Owen Chesbrough 7/10 4653 days 21%
Clare Cade 10/10 4653 days 22%
Stefan Roehrbein 8/10 4654 days 22%
Elizabeth Gardner 10/10 4663 days 22%
Alison Rosser 7/10 4665 days 21%
Louis Smit 8/10 4666 days 22%
Cick Pouw 8/10 4670 days 22%
R & M Willows 10/10 4750 days 22%
Dogoneit 9/10 4977 days 22%
Jo Meekley 9/10 4992 days 22%
Juliane Kleiu 8/10 4998 days 22%
Richard Bennink 8/10 4998 days 22%
Carolin 8/10 5007 days 22%
Jeroen 9/10 5011 days 22%
Petersen 10/10 5029 days 22%
Mr and Mrs Scott 9/10 5373 days 22%
Pierre Pilon 10/10 5381 days 22%
Alzbeta Czech 9/10 5387 days 22%
Nick 8/10 5400 days 22%
Kaye 9/10 5707 days 22%
Katy1 8/10 5709 days 22%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rangitoto Summit Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.91% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.