G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Foulwind Walkway.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Cape Foulwind Walkway
Valid Reviews
84 Valid Reviews
The Cape Foulwind Walkway experience has a total of 84 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 84 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 32 |
|
38% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Foulwind Walkway valid reviews is 88.45% and is based on 84 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 84 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 30 |
|
39% |
| 8/10 | 21 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.96% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Foulwind Walkway face-to-face reviews is 88.96% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
88.64%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Becky Fox | 8/10 | 3264 days | 100% |
| Emma Millett | 8/10 | 3264 days | 100% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 10/10 | 3309 days | 98% |
| Daphne Andrey | 8/10 | 3311 days | 96% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 3318 days | 96% |
| Rocco | 10/10 | 3561 days | 75% |
| Sylvain Blanchet | 8/10 | 3612 days | 68% |
| Ronja and Lena | 8/10 | 3662 days | 64% |
| Brian Lexmond | 6/10 | 4282 days | 7% |
| Julian Kuemme | 9/10 | 4285 days | 7% |
| Max Backelandt | 9/10 | 4289 days | 7% |
| Austin Johns | 9/10 | 4312 days | 5% |
| Johanna Kofler | 8/10 | 4313 days | 5% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 9/10 | 4315 days | 5% |
| Helen McKevitt | 9/10 | 4316 days | 5% |
| Marion Busch | 9/10 | 4325 days | 4% |
| M K | 10/10 | 4351 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Stark | 10/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Azteca | 6/10 | 4553 days | 39% |
| hendrik king | 6/10 | 4583 days | 39% |
| Stefan AuRich | 9/10 | 4683 days | 46% |
| John and Chris Creese | 10/10 | 4698 days | 46% |
| N Zitscher | 10/10 | 4768 days | 46% |
| Fries | 10/10 | 5049 days | 46% |
| Les Barnes | 9/10 | 5049 days | 46% |
| Rick Moth | 9/10 | 5049 days | 46% |
| Josef | 9/10 | 5050 days | 46% |
| Seth & Carla | 9/10 | 5054 days | 46% |
| Butz | 8/10 | 5055 days | 45% |
| Steve Goodyear | 9/10 | 5061 days | 46% |
| Frank Krivauek | 8/10 | 5063 days | 45% |
| Brian Frost | 10/10 | 5063 days | 46% |
| Volker Neumeyer | 9/10 | 5064 days | 46% |
| Tom Connis | 8/10 | 5068 days | 45% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5069 days | 46% |
| Dirk Faupel | 9/10 | 5135 days | 46% |
| Dirk Faupel | 9/10 | 5135 days | 46% |
| damaca | 9/10 | 5222 days | 46% |
| John Wekking | 8/10 | 5345 days | 45% |
| Karin Kueng | 10/10 | 5394 days | 46% |
| bryfrance | 10/10 | 5396 days | 46% |
| Juerg & Denise Zuesli | 10/10 | 5399 days | 46% |
| Chris & Anne Pearson | 10/10 | 5400 days | 46% |
| Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5406 days | 45% |
| Matthys Kikke | 9/10 | 5410 days | 46% |
| Edwards | 9/10 | 5413 days | 46% |
| Jennie McIver | 9/10 | 5421 days | 46% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5422 days | 46% |
| Robert Cox | 9/10 | 5425 days | 46% |
| Mike and Alice Powner | 8/10 | 5425 days | 45% |
| Webster | 10/10 | 5427 days | 46% |
| Gordon Daniels | 4/10 | 5429 days | 30% |
| Niels Van Welsenes | 8/10 | 5434 days | 45% |
| Risch & Seybold | 10/10 | 5753 days | 46% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5759 days | 46% |
| Evans | 7/10 | 5759 days | 43% |
| Jana Steve | 10/10 | 5765 days | 46% |
| Tom Bos | 8/10 | 5766 days | 45% |
| Giaque | 9/10 | 5777 days | 46% |
| Armand | 8/10 | 5785 days | 45% |
| Eva | 9/10 | 5788 days | 46% |
| kararina Kosten | 10/10 | 5793 days | 46% |
| Birgit Haver | 10/10 | 5793 days | 46% |
| Hugli | 9/10 | 5804 days | 46% |
| Chris Kevin | 10/10 | 5808 days | 46% |
| Omar Frenchy | 9/10 | 5808 days | 46% |
| Catherine Clavel | 9/10 | 5808 days | 46% |
| Bo Moenstead | 9/10 | 5808 days | 46% |
| Nigel Armstrong | 10/10 | 5810 days | 46% |
| Colin Morbey | 8/10 | 5813 days | 45% |
| Johan Vaartjes | 8/10 | 5815 days | 45% |
| Connie Graae | 9/10 | 5816 days | 46% |
| Greg Kennedy | 10/10 | 5818 days | 46% |
| Heinrich Hax | 10/10 | 5819 days | 46% |
| Heino keyssler | 10/10 | 5819 days | 46% |
| Decuq | 8/10 | 5872 days | 45% |
| Simon Bartholomew | 8/10 | 5873 days | 45% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5888 days | 46% |
| Ruth Kinder | 9/10 | 5891 days | 46% |
| HansH1 | 10/10 | 6100 days | 46% |
| StephaineFrance | 8/10 | 6105 days | 45% |
| Enno Brehm | 8/10 | 6117 days | 45% |
| AndrewW | 8/10 | 6117 days | 45% |
| Rissmann | 9/10 | 6121 days | 46% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Foulwind Walkway does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.19% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.