Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rotorua Campervans.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Rotorua Campervans
Valid Reviews
101 Valid Reviews
The Rotorua Campervans experience has a total of 104 reviews. There are 101 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 101 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 45 |
|
45% |
| 9/10 | 37 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 16 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Campervans valid reviews is 92.18% and is based on 101 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
16 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 101 valid reviews, the experience has 16 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 16 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 4 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
63% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.63% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Rotorua Campervans face-to-face reviews is 80.63% and is based on 16 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
93.27%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marcel Brinkhof | 8/10 | 387 days | 100% |
| Danielle | 10/10 | 632 days | 86% |
| Rick en Ina | 9/10 | 691 days | 80% |
| Peter van Leeuwen | 10/10 | 691 days | 81% |
| Jouke | 10/10 | 752 days | 76% |
| Lisette en Hans | 10/10 | 1727 days | 6% |
| Tom & Martine | 10/10 | 1787 days | 6% |
| Wiechert en Lia Eschbach | 10/10 | 1848 days | 5% |
| Paul Berresford | 10/10 | 2092 days | 5% |
| Lidy and Jan | 10/10 | 2093 days | 5% |
| Henriette en Gerard Donkers | 9/10 | 2093 days | 5% |
| Andrew Saunders | 10/10 | 2093 days | 5% |
| Richard | 8/10 | 2152 days | 5% |
| Kaas | 9/10 | 2183 days | 5% |
| Ron Baldal | 10/10 | 2212 days | 5% |
| Angela Rawsthorn | 9/10 | 2213 days | 5% |
| Ingrid & Gerben Siegersma | 9/10 | 2213 days | 5% |
| Rens and Jenny Hollander | 9/10 | 2380 days | 3% |
| Jane Hargreaves | 9/10 | 2426 days | 4% |
| Benno Roest | 9/10 | 2427 days | 4% |
| Geert De Vreese | 10/10 | 2427 days | 4% |
| Valerie Homeniuk | 9/10 | 2457 days | 4% |
| Jacob Batema | 9/10 | 2457 days | 4% |
| Femke Zeegers | 9/10 | 2457 days | 4% |
| Inga Serfort | 10/10 | 2458 days | 4% |
| Myra Van Dijk | 9/10 | 2516 days | 4% |
| Ruth Hermans | 10/10 | 2516 days | 4% |
| guus van ginkel | 9/10 | 2516 days | 4% |
| jean-francois Gervais | 8/10 | 2577 days | 4% |
| Maritza | 9/10 | 2577 days | 4% |
| Sara No | 10/10 | 2577 days | 4% |
| J. Coolen | 9/10 | 2769 days | 3% |
| Bart Waanders | 10/10 | 2791 days | 3% |
| Hans-Joachim Stocker | 9/10 | 2822 days | 3% |
| Roelof Wouda | 9/10 | 2822 days | 3% |
| Joop Hendricks | 8/10 | 2822 days | 3% |
| Ole Zinck Østergaard | 9/10 | 2850 days | 3% |
| Frits en Marijke Spieker | 10/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| Sico Kool | 9/10 | 2942 days | 3% |
| willem hoogerbeets | 9/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
| Hadewich D | 10/10 | 3247 days | 2% |
| Evelien Pruis | 9/10 | 3247 days | 2% |
| A. van Dort | 9/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| tineenfook dewawy | 9/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| marius Van Ninhuijs | 10/10 | 3370 days | 2% |
| Jason Wells | 10/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
| Loretta | 9/10 | 3553 days | 2% |
| Femke Stevens | 9/10 | 3581 days | 2% |
| Martin Bakker | 10/10 | 3612 days | 2% |
| ursula voorhorst | 9/10 | 3613 days | 2% |
| s ruijgt | 7/10 | 3613 days | 1% |
| Aart Wagelaar | 10/10 | 3613 days | 2% |
| Jack Buermans | 9/10 | 3644 days | 1% |
| Henk van Leeuwen | 10/10 | 3673 days | 1% |
| Etta van Mullem | 9/10 | 3674 days | 1% |
| Robby van Gruythuysen | 10/10 | 3674 days | 1% |
| Hans en Sil | 9/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
| j k | 9/10 | 3735 days | 1% |
| Jan Legein | 9/10 | 3896 days | 1% |
| joth arends | 9/10 | 3919 days | 1% |
| Benjamin de witte | 10/10 | 3919 days | 1% |
| Henk Bos | 9/10 | 3919 days | 1% |
| Carina Mortelmans | 10/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Jan ten Berge | 10/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Roy Hengeveld | 10/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Joachim | 10/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Kees Van Steenis | 10/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Aletta . | 9/10 | 3978 days | 1% |
| Tim Bosch | 10/10 | 4009 days | 1% |
| Joke Diependaal | 10/10 | 4070 days | 1% |
| jurgen42 | 10/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| pcbennekom | 10/10 | 4404 days | 1% |
| Hugh Barraclough | 10/10 | 4618 days | 1% |
| Eric Lombaard | 9/10 | 4661 days | 1% |
| Dick van Doorn | 8/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
| Johan Kroese | 6/10 | 4689 days | 1% |
| MartinPierik | 10/10 | 4709 days | 1% |
| Uitslag | 8/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
| loesennicojongerius | 10/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
| LMvdWerd | 10/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
| timenanne | 9/10 | 4740 days | 1% |
| GeorgesBert | 10/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
| mennoarts | 10/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
| Herman Heskamp | 10/10 | 4770 days | 1% |
| garmtenesther | 10/10 | 4801 days | 1% |
| John | 8/10 | 5013 days | 1% |
| Michel Op't Landt | 7/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
| Win Groen | 8/10 | 5024 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 8/10 | 5024 days | 1% |
| Bakker | 8/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
| ChrisJeanne | 9/10 | 5074 days | 1% |
| Rogier_Elvira | 10/10 | 5074 days | 1% |
| sachahonig | 10/10 | 5105 days | 1% |
| MartijnSuzanne | 10/10 | 5135 days | 1% |
| koster | 8/10 | 5314 days | 1% |
| Truus en Pierre Wolters | 8/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| Sjoerd de Witte | 10/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| pvo plas | 8/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| bdevries | 8/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
| UlaR | 8/10 | 5704 days | 1% |
| Johannes & Jopke Fokkema | 8/10 | 5734 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Rotorua Campervans experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-7.05% Adjustment
Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.
What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 43 days. The Rotorua Campervans experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:
| Recent Reviews | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| 0 | -3.00% |
| 1 | -2.63% |
| 2 | -1.50% |
| 3 | -0.38% |
| 4 | -0.00% |
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Rotorua Campervans experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.99% |
| 198 | -4.01% |
| 199 | -4.03% |
| 200 | -4.05% |
| 201 | -4.07% |
| 202 | -4.09% |
| 203 | -4.11% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.59% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Onboarding Rating
This rating is about customer service and camper availability. It measures aspects of the customer journey that are often missing from online ratings. It includes performances based on: pre-booking communication, product availability and responsiveness to customer enquiries.
All metrics come from actual customer interactions.
Details are calculated daily from statistics over several years and merged with the score derived from customer reviews - to then form the final ranking score.
Final Ranking Score
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.