Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

77.46%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 673 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1130 days 39%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2622 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3253 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3273 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3290 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3300 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 3302 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3306 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 3335 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3437 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3539 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3542 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3550 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3552 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3552 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3561 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3561 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3564 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3569 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3575 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3584 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3587 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3603 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3603 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3608 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3642 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3656 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3658 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3701 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3779 days 2%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3796 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 3898 days 1%
Carmen 8/10 3922 days 1%
Robin Sommer 10/10 3958 days 1%
Isabelle 9/10 3978 days 1%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 3991 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4013 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4267 days 0%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4268 days 0%
Laure Cops 9/10 4281 days 0%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4312 days 0%
Viola 8/10 4324 days 0%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4325 days 0%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4332 days 0%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4332 days 0%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4339 days 0%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4357 days 0%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4366 days 0%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4387 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4417 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4647 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4647 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4721 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4752 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4759 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4759 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5014 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5016 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5024 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5031 days 1%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5036 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5039 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5041 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5041 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5041 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5042 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5053 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5124 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5128 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5240 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5332 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5352 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5362 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5383 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5387 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5387 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5391 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5398 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5398 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5409 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5418 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5419 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5420 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5544 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5745 days 1%
Main 9/10 5759 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5767 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5771 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5771 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5779 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5786 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5832 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5848 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5860 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5860 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6001 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6080 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6087 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6104 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.76% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

81%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.