Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

75.83%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 320 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 777 days 61%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2269 days 4%
Sebasitian 7/10 2900 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 2920 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 2937 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 2947 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 2949 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 2953 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 2982 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3084 days 3%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3186 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3189 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3197 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3199 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3199 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3208 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3208 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3211 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3216 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3222 days 2%
Chris 6/10 3231 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3234 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3250 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3250 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3255 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3289 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3303 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3305 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3348 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3426 days 2%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3443 days 2%
James Webster 9/10 3545 days 2%
Carmen 8/10 3569 days 2%
Robin Sommer 10/10 3605 days 2%
Isabelle 9/10 3625 days 2%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 3638 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 3660 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 3914 days 1%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 3915 days 1%
Laure Cops 9/10 3928 days 1%
Julie Robinson 8/10 3959 days 1%
Viola 8/10 3971 days 1%
Terry Seaman 9/10 3972 days 1%
Lena Jensen 8/10 3979 days 1%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 3979 days 1%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 3986 days 1%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4004 days 1%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4013 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4034 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4064 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4294 days 0%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4294 days 0%
Hanneke P 8/10 4368 days 0%
Loesje 6/10 4399 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4406 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4406 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 4661 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 4663 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 4671 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 4678 days 0%
Karin Laurev 7/10 4683 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 4686 days 1%
Russell 9/10 4688 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 4688 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 4688 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 4689 days 1%
Carel 7/10 4700 days 1%
Kai 10/10 4771 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 4775 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 4887 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 4979 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 4999 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5009 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5030 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5034 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5034 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5038 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5045 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5045 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5056 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5065 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5066 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5067 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5191 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5392 days 1%
Main 9/10 5406 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5414 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5418 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5418 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5426 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5433 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5479 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5495 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5507 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5507 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 5648 days 1%
JonK 9/10 5727 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 5734 days 1%
JanW 3/10 5751 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

4.33% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

80%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.