Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

77.52%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 685 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1142 days 38%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2634 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3265 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3285 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3302 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3312 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 3314 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3318 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 3347 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3449 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3551 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3554 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3562 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3564 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3564 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3573 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3573 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3576 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3581 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3587 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3596 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3599 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3615 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3615 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3620 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3654 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3668 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3670 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3713 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3791 days 2%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3808 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 3910 days 1%
Carmen 8/10 3934 days 1%
Robin Sommer 10/10 3970 days 1%
Isabelle 9/10 3990 days 1%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 4003 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4025 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4279 days 0%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4280 days 0%
Laure Cops 9/10 4293 days 0%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4324 days 0%
Viola 8/10 4336 days 0%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4337 days 0%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4344 days 0%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4344 days 0%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4351 days 0%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4369 days 0%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4378 days 0%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4399 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4429 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4659 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4659 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4733 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4764 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4771 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4771 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5026 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5028 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5036 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5043 days 1%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5048 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5051 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5053 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5053 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5053 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5054 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5065 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5136 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5140 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5252 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5344 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5364 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5374 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5395 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5399 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5399 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5403 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5410 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5410 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5421 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5430 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5431 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5432 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5556 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5757 days 1%
Main 9/10 5771 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5779 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5783 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5783 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5791 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5798 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5844 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5860 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5872 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5872 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6013 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6092 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6099 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6116 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.75% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

81%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.