Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

77.50%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 682 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1139 days 38%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2631 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3262 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3282 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3299 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3309 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 3311 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3315 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 3344 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3446 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3548 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3551 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3559 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3561 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3561 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3570 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3570 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3573 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3578 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3584 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3593 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3596 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3612 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3612 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3617 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3651 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3665 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3667 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3710 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3787 days 2%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3805 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 3907 days 1%
Carmen 8/10 3931 days 1%
Robin Sommer 10/10 3967 days 1%
Isabelle 9/10 3987 days 1%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 3999 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4022 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4276 days 0%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4277 days 0%
Laure Cops 9/10 4290 days 0%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4321 days 0%
Viola 8/10 4333 days 0%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4334 days 0%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4341 days 0%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4341 days 0%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4348 days 0%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4366 days 0%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4375 days 0%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4396 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4426 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4656 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4656 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4730 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4761 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4768 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4768 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5023 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5025 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5033 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5040 days 1%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5045 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5048 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5050 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5050 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5050 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5051 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5062 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5133 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5137 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5249 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5341 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5361 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5371 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5392 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5396 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5396 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5400 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5407 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5407 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5418 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5427 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5428 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5429 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5553 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5754 days 1%
Main 9/10 5768 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5776 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5780 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5780 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5788 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5795 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5841 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5857 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5869 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5869 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6010 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6089 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6096 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6113 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.75% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

81%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.