Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
100 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
78.21%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nina S. Larsen | 8/10 | 768 days | 100% |
| Sarah | 6/10 | 1225 days | 34% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2717 days | 5% |
| Sebasitian | 7/10 | 3348 days | 3% |
| Jerome Cluzel | 7/10 | 3368 days | 3% |
| Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 3385 days | 3% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 3395 days | 3% |
| Maarten | 5/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Jean Charlies Coudray | 8/10 | 3401 days | 3% |
| Ulrich K | 5/10 | 3430 days | 2% |
| Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3532 days | 2% |
| Nele Foerske | 8/10 | 3634 days | 2% |
| Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3637 days | 2% |
| Benedikt Maus | 7/10 | 3645 days | 2% |
| Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3647 days | 2% |
| Alvaro Rodriguez | 10/10 | 3647 days | 2% |
| Radim Halasz | 7/10 | 3656 days | 2% |
| Katerina Vobecka | 8/10 | 3656 days | 2% |
| Michael Menrath | 5/10 | 3659 days | 2% |
| Liwen | 5/10 | 3664 days | 2% |
| Laura Harmon | 4/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| Chris | 6/10 | 3679 days | 2% |
| Sandrine | 5/10 | 3682 days | 2% |
| Simon Striegel | 7/10 | 3698 days | 2% |
| Sophia Zaenglo | 7/10 | 3698 days | 2% |
| Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3703 days | 2% |
| Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3737 days | 2% |
| Nicole and Elliott | 8/10 | 3751 days | 2% |
| Evie Sel | 7/10 | 3753 days | 2% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3796 days | 2% |
| Annabelle deMontignie | 10/10 | 3874 days | 2% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 6/10 | 3891 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 9/10 | 3993 days | 1% |
| Carmen | 8/10 | 4017 days | 1% |
| Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 4053 days | 1% |
| Isabelle | 9/10 | 4073 days | 1% |
| Matthias Thorn | 5/10 | 4086 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Privat | 9/10 | 4108 days | 1% |
| Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Martin Sajdok | 5/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
| Viola | 8/10 | 4419 days | 1% |
| Terry Seaman | 9/10 | 4420 days | 2% |
| Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Jacqui Knight | 10/10 | 4434 days | 2% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 9/10 | 4452 days | 2% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 4461 days | 1% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4482 days | 2% |
| Brian | 9/10 | 4512 days | 2% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 4742 days | 2% |
| Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4742 days | 2% |
| Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4816 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 6/10 | 4847 days | 1% |
| Auger | 9/10 | 4854 days | 2% |
| Auger | 9/10 | 4854 days | 2% |
| Sally Gordie | 10/10 | 5109 days | 2% |
| Oliver Hardt | 8/10 | 5111 days | 1% |
| Tinne Cis | 4/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
| Indra t Jolle | 2/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
| Karin Laurev | 7/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
| Ed & Katie Riches | 6/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5136 days | 2% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 9/10 | 5136 days | 2% |
| Diane Moss | 8/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
| John A Jerome | 9/10 | 5137 days | 2% |
| Carel | 7/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
| Kai | 10/10 | 5219 days | 2% |
| Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 5223 days | 2% |
| cruisysue | 8/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
| Phill2517 | 9/10 | 5427 days | 2% |
| Marcus | 9/10 | 5447 days | 2% |
| Andrew Newark | 8/10 | 5457 days | 1% |
| Fasto Maserati | 7/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
| Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5482 days | 2% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 8/10 | 5482 days | 1% |
| Kai Eppink | 6/10 | 5486 days | 1% |
| Marcus | 8/10 | 5493 days | 1% |
| Manu & Gabi | 10/10 | 5493 days | 2% |
| Marieke and Bert-Jan | 8/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
| Jensen | 8/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
| Jochen | 8/10 | 5514 days | 1% |
| Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5515 days | 2% |
| Montys | 9/10 | 5639 days | 2% |
| Bowness | 9/10 | 5840 days | 2% |
| Main | 9/10 | 5854 days | 2% |
| Krause | 10/10 | 5862 days | 2% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 5866 days | 2% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5866 days | 2% |
| John Helle | 7/10 | 5874 days | 1% |
| Mathias | 3/10 | 5881 days | 1% |
| middendorp | 10/10 | 5927 days | 2% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 5943 days | 2% |
| Ann Riley | 8/10 | 5955 days | 1% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5955 days | 2% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6096 days | 2% |
| JonK | 9/10 | 6175 days | 2% |
| SophieC | 9/10 | 6182 days | 2% |
| JanW | 3/10 | 6199 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.52% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
82%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.