Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Moeraki Boulders

Valid Reviews

100 Valid Reviews

The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
21%
9/10 24
24%
8/10 24
24%
7/10 13
13%
6/10 6
6%
5/10 7
7%
4/10 2
2%
3/10 2
2%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.60% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

77 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
19%
9/10 18
23%
8/10 19
25%
7/10 13
17%
6/10 3
4%
5/10 5
6%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
1%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

79.35% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

78.11%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Nina S. Larsen 8/10 747 days 100%
Sarah 6/10 1204 days 35%
Mike Fricker 10/10 2696 days 5%
Sebasitian 7/10 3327 days 3%
Jerome Cluzel 7/10 3347 days 3%
Franziska Liebe 10/10 3364 days 3%
Sophie 8/10 3374 days 3%
Maarten 5/10 3376 days 2%
Jean Charlies Coudray 8/10 3380 days 3%
Ulrich K 5/10 3409 days 2%
Philippa Buchanan 8/10 3511 days 2%
Nele Foerske 8/10 3613 days 2%
Gavin Moffatt 7/10 3616 days 2%
Benedikt Maus 7/10 3624 days 2%
Laura Munguira Vadillo 9/10 3626 days 2%
Alvaro Rodriguez 10/10 3626 days 2%
Radim Halasz 7/10 3635 days 2%
Katerina Vobecka 8/10 3635 days 2%
Michael Menrath 5/10 3638 days 2%
Liwen 5/10 3643 days 2%
Laura Harmon 4/10 3649 days 1%
Chris 6/10 3658 days 2%
Sandrine 5/10 3661 days 2%
Simon Striegel 7/10 3677 days 2%
Sophia Zaenglo 7/10 3677 days 2%
Brandon Patton 10/10 3682 days 2%
Dan Wilson 7/10 3716 days 2%
Nicole and Elliott 8/10 3730 days 2%
Evie Sel 7/10 3732 days 2%
Emma Rochester 10/10 3775 days 2%
Annabelle deMontignie 10/10 3852 days 1%
Dianne van der Wal 6/10 3870 days 1%
James Webster 9/10 3972 days 1%
Carmen 8/10 3996 days 1%
Robin Sommer 10/10 4032 days 1%
Isabelle 9/10 4052 days 1%
Matthias Thorn 5/10 4064 days 1%
Bjorn Privat 9/10 4087 days 1%
Karen Garvin 10/10 4341 days 0%
Martin Sajdok 5/10 4342 days 0%
Laure Cops 9/10 4355 days 0%
Julie Robinson 8/10 4386 days 1%
Viola 8/10 4398 days 1%
Terry Seaman 9/10 4399 days 1%
Lena Jensen 8/10 4406 days 1%
Jesper Andersen 8/10 4406 days 1%
Jacqui Knight 10/10 4413 days 1%
Nicolas Trezeguet 9/10 4431 days 1%
Kim Maertens 8/10 4440 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 10/10 4461 days 1%
Brian 9/10 4491 days 1%
Stefan 9/10 4721 days 1%
Bettina Fluhrer 10/10 4721 days 1%
Hanneke P 8/10 4795 days 1%
Loesje 6/10 4826 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4833 days 1%
Auger 9/10 4833 days 1%
Sally Gordie 10/10 5088 days 1%
Oliver Hardt 8/10 5090 days 1%
Tinne Cis 4/10 5098 days 1%
Indra t Jolle 2/10 5105 days 1%
Karin Laurev 7/10 5110 days 1%
Ed & Katie Riches 6/10 5113 days 1%
Russell 9/10 5115 days 1%
Tadej Ferjan 9/10 5115 days 1%
Diane Moss 8/10 5115 days 1%
John A Jerome 9/10 5116 days 1%
Carel 7/10 5127 days 1%
Kai 10/10 5198 days 1%
Rebecca & Hugh Small 9/10 5202 days 1%
cruisysue 8/10 5314 days 1%
Phill2517 9/10 5406 days 1%
Marcus 9/10 5426 days 1%
Andrew Newark 8/10 5436 days 1%
Fasto Maserati 7/10 5457 days 1%
Hendrik Behrens 9/10 5461 days 1%
Lynda Hutchins 8/10 5461 days 1%
Kai Eppink 6/10 5465 days 1%
Marcus 8/10 5472 days 1%
Manu & Gabi 10/10 5472 days 1%
Marieke and Bert-Jan 8/10 5483 days 1%
Jensen 8/10 5492 days 1%
Jochen 8/10 5493 days 1%
Doris Neuber 10/10 5494 days 1%
Montys 9/10 5618 days 1%
Bowness 9/10 5819 days 1%
Main 9/10 5833 days 1%
Krause 10/10 5841 days 1%
Neal 10/10 5845 days 1%
Wilbert Germ 10/10 5845 days 1%
John Helle 7/10 5853 days 1%
Mathias 3/10 5860 days 1%
middendorp 10/10 5906 days 1%
Anna 10/10 5922 days 1%
Ann Riley 8/10 5934 days 1%
Marcel Schleinkcfer 9/10 5934 days 1%
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler 10/10 6075 days 1%
JonK 9/10 6154 days 1%
SophieC 9/10 6161 days 1%
JanW 3/10 6178 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

3.56% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

82%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.