Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
100 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 21 |
|
21% |
9/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
5/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
17% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
75.72%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Nina S. Larsen | 8/10 | 291 days | 100% |
Sarah | 6/10 | 748 days | 63% |
Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2240 days | 4% |
Sebasitian | 7/10 | 2871 days | 3% |
Jerome Cluzel | 7/10 | 2891 days | 3% |
Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 2908 days | 3% |
Sophie | 8/10 | 2918 days | 3% |
Maarten | 5/10 | 2920 days | 2% |
Jean Charlies Coudray | 8/10 | 2924 days | 3% |
Ulrich K | 5/10 | 2953 days | 2% |
Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3055 days | 3% |
Nele Foerske | 8/10 | 3157 days | 3% |
Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3160 days | 2% |
Benedikt Maus | 7/10 | 3168 days | 2% |
Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3170 days | 3% |
Alvaro Rodriguez | 10/10 | 3170 days | 3% |
Radim Halasz | 7/10 | 3179 days | 2% |
Katerina Vobecka | 8/10 | 3179 days | 2% |
Michael Menrath | 5/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
Liwen | 5/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
Laura Harmon | 4/10 | 3193 days | 2% |
Chris | 6/10 | 3202 days | 2% |
Sandrine | 5/10 | 3205 days | 2% |
Simon Striegel | 7/10 | 3221 days | 2% |
Sophia Zaenglo | 7/10 | 3221 days | 2% |
Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3226 days | 2% |
Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
Nicole and Elliott | 8/10 | 3274 days | 2% |
Evie Sel | 7/10 | 3276 days | 2% |
Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3319 days | 2% |
Annabelle deMontignie | 10/10 | 3396 days | 2% |
Dianne van der Wal | 6/10 | 3414 days | 2% |
James Webster | 9/10 | 3516 days | 2% |
Carmen | 8/10 | 3540 days | 2% |
Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 3576 days | 2% |
Isabelle | 9/10 | 3596 days | 2% |
Matthias Thorn | 5/10 | 3608 days | 1% |
Bjorn Privat | 9/10 | 3631 days | 2% |
Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 3885 days | 1% |
Martin Sajdok | 5/10 | 3886 days | 1% |
Laure Cops | 9/10 | 3899 days | 1% |
Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 3930 days | 1% |
Viola | 8/10 | 3942 days | 1% |
Terry Seaman | 9/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 3950 days | 1% |
Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 3950 days | 1% |
Jacqui Knight | 10/10 | 3957 days | 1% |
Nicolas Trezeguet | 9/10 | 3975 days | 1% |
Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 3984 days | 1% |
FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4005 days | 1% |
Brian | 9/10 | 4035 days | 1% |
Stefan | 9/10 | 4265 days | 0% |
Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4265 days | 0% |
Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
Loesje | 6/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
Auger | 9/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
Auger | 9/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
Sally Gordie | 10/10 | 4632 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 8/10 | 4634 days | 1% |
Tinne Cis | 4/10 | 4642 days | 1% |
Indra t Jolle | 2/10 | 4649 days | 0% |
Karin Laurev | 7/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
Ed & Katie Riches | 6/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
Tadej Ferjan | 9/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
Diane Moss | 8/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
John A Jerome | 9/10 | 4660 days | 1% |
Carel | 7/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
Kai | 10/10 | 4742 days | 1% |
Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
cruisysue | 8/10 | 4858 days | 1% |
Phill2517 | 9/10 | 4950 days | 1% |
Marcus | 9/10 | 4970 days | 1% |
Andrew Newark | 8/10 | 4980 days | 1% |
Fasto Maserati | 7/10 | 5001 days | 1% |
Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 8/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Kai Eppink | 6/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
Marcus | 8/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
Manu & Gabi | 10/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
Marieke and Bert-Jan | 8/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
Jensen | 8/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
Jochen | 8/10 | 5037 days | 1% |
Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
Montys | 9/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
Bowness | 9/10 | 5363 days | 1% |
Main | 9/10 | 5377 days | 1% |
Krause | 10/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
Neal | 10/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
John Helle | 7/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
Mathias | 3/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
middendorp | 10/10 | 5450 days | 1% |
Anna | 10/10 | 5466 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 8/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5478 days | 1% |
Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 5619 days | 1% |
JonK | 9/10 | 5698 days | 1% |
SophieC | 9/10 | 5705 days | 1% |
JanW | 3/10 | 5722 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
4.37% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.