Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moeraki Boulders.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
100 Valid Reviews
The Moeraki Boulders experience has a total of 100 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 100 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
21% |
| 9/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 24 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
7% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.60% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders valid reviews is 79.60% and is based on 100 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
77 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 100 valid reviews, the experience has 77 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 77 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 18 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 19 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
79.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moeraki Boulders face-to-face reviews is 79.35% and is based on 77 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
77.51%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nina S. Larsen | 8/10 | 683 days | 100% |
| Sarah | 6/10 | 1140 days | 38% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2632 days | 5% |
| Sebasitian | 7/10 | 3263 days | 3% |
| Jerome Cluzel | 7/10 | 3283 days | 3% |
| Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 3300 days | 3% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 3310 days | 3% |
| Maarten | 5/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
| Jean Charlies Coudray | 8/10 | 3316 days | 3% |
| Ulrich K | 5/10 | 3345 days | 2% |
| Philippa Buchanan | 8/10 | 3447 days | 2% |
| Nele Foerske | 8/10 | 3549 days | 2% |
| Gavin Moffatt | 7/10 | 3552 days | 2% |
| Benedikt Maus | 7/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
| Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3562 days | 2% |
| Alvaro Rodriguez | 10/10 | 3562 days | 2% |
| Radim Halasz | 7/10 | 3571 days | 2% |
| Katerina Vobecka | 8/10 | 3571 days | 2% |
| Michael Menrath | 5/10 | 3574 days | 2% |
| Liwen | 5/10 | 3579 days | 2% |
| Laura Harmon | 4/10 | 3585 days | 1% |
| Chris | 6/10 | 3594 days | 2% |
| Sandrine | 5/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Simon Striegel | 7/10 | 3613 days | 2% |
| Sophia Zaenglo | 7/10 | 3613 days | 2% |
| Brandon Patton | 10/10 | 3618 days | 2% |
| Dan Wilson | 7/10 | 3652 days | 2% |
| Nicole and Elliott | 8/10 | 3666 days | 2% |
| Evie Sel | 7/10 | 3668 days | 2% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3711 days | 2% |
| Annabelle deMontignie | 10/10 | 3788 days | 2% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 6/10 | 3806 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 9/10 | 3908 days | 1% |
| Carmen | 8/10 | 3932 days | 1% |
| Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
| Isabelle | 9/10 | 3988 days | 1% |
| Matthias Thorn | 5/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Bjorn Privat | 9/10 | 4023 days | 1% |
| Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 4277 days | 0% |
| Martin Sajdok | 5/10 | 4278 days | 0% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 4291 days | 0% |
| Julie Robinson | 8/10 | 4322 days | 0% |
| Viola | 8/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
| Terry Seaman | 9/10 | 4335 days | 0% |
| Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
| Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 4342 days | 0% |
| Jacqui Knight | 10/10 | 4349 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 9/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
| Brian | 9/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
| Bettina Fluhrer | 10/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
| Hanneke P | 8/10 | 4731 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 6/10 | 4762 days | 1% |
| Auger | 9/10 | 4769 days | 1% |
| Auger | 9/10 | 4769 days | 1% |
| Sally Gordie | 10/10 | 5024 days | 1% |
| Oliver Hardt | 8/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
| Tinne Cis | 4/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
| Indra t Jolle | 2/10 | 5041 days | 1% |
| Karin Laurev | 7/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
| Ed & Katie Riches | 6/10 | 5049 days | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Tadej Ferjan | 9/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Diane Moss | 8/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| John A Jerome | 9/10 | 5052 days | 1% |
| Carel | 7/10 | 5063 days | 1% |
| Kai | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
| Rebecca & Hugh Small | 9/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
| cruisysue | 8/10 | 5250 days | 1% |
| Phill2517 | 9/10 | 5342 days | 1% |
| Marcus | 9/10 | 5362 days | 1% |
| Andrew Newark | 8/10 | 5372 days | 1% |
| Fasto Maserati | 7/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
| Hendrik Behrens | 9/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 8/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
| Kai Eppink | 6/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
| Marcus | 8/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| Manu & Gabi | 10/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| Marieke and Bert-Jan | 8/10 | 5419 days | 1% |
| Jensen | 8/10 | 5428 days | 1% |
| Jochen | 8/10 | 5429 days | 1% |
| Doris Neuber | 10/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
| Montys | 9/10 | 5554 days | 1% |
| Bowness | 9/10 | 5755 days | 1% |
| Main | 9/10 | 5769 days | 1% |
| Krause | 10/10 | 5777 days | 1% |
| Neal | 10/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5781 days | 1% |
| John Helle | 7/10 | 5789 days | 1% |
| Mathias | 3/10 | 5796 days | 1% |
| middendorp | 10/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 5858 days | 1% |
| Ann Riley | 8/10 | 5870 days | 1% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5870 days | 1% |
| Rose and Jess Damon and Esler | 10/10 | 6011 days | 1% |
| JonK | 9/10 | 6090 days | 1% |
| SophieC | 9/10 | 6097 days | 1% |
| JanW | 3/10 | 6114 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moeraki Boulders does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
3.75% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.