Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Sandfly Bay Track.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Sandfly Bay Track

Valid Reviews

58 Valid Reviews

The Sandfly Bay Track experience has a total of 58 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 58 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 27
47%
9/10 17
29%
8/10 11
19%
7/10 3
5%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.72% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Sandfly Bay Track valid reviews is 91.72% and is based on 58 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

46 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 58 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 19
41%
9/10 15
33%
8/10 10
22%
7/10 2
4%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.09% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Sandfly Bay Track face-to-face reviews is 91.09% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

92.68%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Susanne 10/10 1783 days 100%
Frankie 10/10 2056 days 89%
xavier MICHEL 10/10 2118 days 87%
Melinda Pyke 10/10 2209 days 83%
S Weslake 8/10 2362 days 76%
Damien Bernard 10/10 2766 days 62%
Fabian Probst 9/10 2791 days 60%
Myriam Ackermann 9/10 2791 days 60%
Eveet De Beleir 9/10 2829 days 59%
Ilona Roeters 9/10 2829 days 59%
Sylvie Martel 10/10 2836 days 59%
Vallee Manon 8/10 2836 days 58%
Laia Pujol 10/10 2838 days 59%
Gessica 10/10 3111 days 48%
Lili Souris 10/10 3132 days 48%
Sven and Annie 9/10 3165 days 46%
Steffen and Johannes 8/10 3202 days 44%
Ella Gilmer 9/10 3457 days 35%
Sofie Jebsen 9/10 3478 days 34%
Tobias 9/10 3478 days 34%
Isabelle 9/10 3535 days 32%
Matthias Thorn 9/10 3547 days 31%
Jesper Henriksen 7/10 3849 days 19%
Julien de la lande 7/10 3895 days 17%
Aude Moulin 9/10 3895 days 18%
celie Mcquair 10/10 3919 days 17%
Tan 10/10 4035 days 13%
Katharina Littlemann 10/10 4231 days 5%
M Natterser 8/10 4297 days 3%
Knorr Bracher 10/10 4313 days 2%
Dagette 10/10 4370 days 0%
Margreet Hanemaaijer 8/10 4570 days 19%
Hilbert vanEssen 8/10 4581 days 19%
Pete & Pat Etheridge 10/10 4593 days 19%
Devon Urlacher 8/10 4607 days 19%
Fairouz 7/10 4644 days 18%
Lydia McLean 9/10 4691 days 19%
Jasmin Loeffler 10/10 4895 days 19%
Rocipon 10/10 4933 days 19%
Juliane Kleiu 8/10 4940 days 19%
Chris 10/10 4944 days 19%
Anne & Robert 10/10 4978 days 19%
dollimyxture 10/10 5009 days 19%
davidm239 9/10 5254 days 19%
jenniferuk 8/10 5254 days 19%
Risch & Seybold 8/10 5297 days 19%
Paula Martinez 10/10 5318 days 19%
John Cox 9/10 5321 days 19%
Nicola 9/10 5324 days 19%
Loleit 10/10 5336 days 19%
Johanna X 10/10 5338 days 19%
martinab 10/10 5389 days 19%
Werner Zuis 10/10 5390 days 19%
koellner 9/10 5403 days 19%
Artur D 10/10 5407 days 19%
Myriauy Rito 8/10 5413 days 19%
Emma-Louise Vetriano 10/10 5415 days 19%
MiepS 9/10 5637 days 19%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Sandfly Bay Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.67% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

93%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.