Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lumsden Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lumsden Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

24 Valid Reviews

The Lumsden Camping Ground experience has a total of 26 reviews. There are 24 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 24 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
29%
9/10 5
21%
8/10 5
21%
7/10 5
21%
6/10 1
4%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
4%
1/10 0
0%

82.50% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lumsden Camping Ground valid reviews is 82.50% and is based on 24 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

93.96%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Keith 10/10 118 days 100%
Hilary Fortune 10/10 271 days 97%
Phil 10/10 300 days 96%
小B 8/10 637 days 76%
Margaret Wikaire 9/10 1002 days 43%
Elaine 8/10 1914 days 5%
Melanie 8/10 2157 days 4%
Schmeek 9/10 2188 days 4%
David Kielty 9/10 2218 days 4%
Caroline 10/10 2402 days 4%
Rebecca 10/10 2432 days 4%
Saleena Ham 7/10 2432 days 3%
Arne 10/10 2432 days 4%
Nicky 10/10 2463 days 4%
Edward Cromwell 8/10 2485 days 2%
Rodney Morris 2/10 2586 days 1%
Sufian Mohd Deris 6/10 3040 days 2%
Ellen O'Connor 9/10 3067 days 2%
Hans-Jorg Langguth 9/10 3231 days 2%
Jan Mentink 7/10 3391 days 2%
Andreas Knipper 7/10 3399 days 2%
jhwjhw 8/10 4258 days 0%
Nicholas I Allen 7/10 4440 days 1%
sueadegizmo 7/10 4562 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Lumsden Camping Ground experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-2.28% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 43 days. However the Lumsden Camping Ground experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Lumsden Camping Ground experience has been adjusted for 112 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
109 -2.22%
110 -2.24%
111 -2.26%
112 -2.28%
113 -2.30%
114 -2.32%
115 -2.34%

Balancing Adjustment

0.78% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

93%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.