G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mangaweka Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Mangaweka Campground
Valid Reviews
36 Valid Reviews
The Mangaweka Campground experience has a total of 36 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 36 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 20 |
|
56% |
| 9/10 | 6 |
|
17% |
| 8/10 | 8 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mangaweka Campground valid reviews is 91.39% and is based on 36 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
5 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 36 valid reviews, the experience has 5 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 5 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 2 |
|
40% |
| 9/10 | 1 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
20% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mangaweka Campground face-to-face reviews is 82.00% and is based on 5 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
94.31%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paul S | 10/10 | 200 days | 100% |
| Lucy | 10/10 | 260 days | 98% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 505 days | 87% |
| Vanessa | 10/10 | 566 days | 84% |
| Alexander Van putten | 10/10 | 594 days | 82% |
| Katie Edser | 8/10 | 594 days | 80% |
| Lara | 9/10 | 717 days | 72% |
| Stacey | 8/10 | 990 days | 45% |
| Kirsti | 7/10 | 1265 days | 22% |
| Chloe | 10/10 | 1355 days | 18% |
| Callum | 10/10 | 1386 days | 16% |
| Izzy | 8/10 | 1782 days | 5% |
| Tam | 10/10 | 2055 days | 5% |
| Paula Forward-Burr | 10/10 | 2086 days | 5% |
| Annina Jarvinen | 10/10 | 2470 days | 3% |
| Niko1621 | 10/10 | 2481 days | 4% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 2712 days | 3% |
| Pamela Hoffman | 9/10 | 3063 days | 3% |
| Clara Bertomeu | 8/10 | 3073 days | 3% |
| Adam Millar | 10/10 | 3114 days | 3% |
| renee verwey | 9/10 | 3145 days | 2% |
| Maartje | 8/10 | 3147 days | 2% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3162 days | 2% |
| David From Switzerland | 10/10 | 3210 days | 2% |
| hendrik king | 9/10 | 3242 days | 2% |
| Peter Pan | 8/10 | 3426 days | 2% |
| Patricia Erni | 10/10 | 3831 days | 1% |
| Rikke Petersen | 9/10 | 3871 days | 1% |
| yvonneholcombe | 10/10 | 4218 days | 0% |
| Sharon Jamieson | 10/10 | 4277 days | 0% |
| nzclaire | 10/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| RIchardS | 10/10 | 4583 days | 1% |
| Kayakin | 8/10 | 4583 days | 1% |
| trutta | 10/10 | 4612 days | 1% |
| Brewdab Shing | 10/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
| Gary A | 4/10 | 4704 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Mangaweka Campground experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.94% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 76 days. However the Mangaweka Campground experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Mangaweka Campground experience has been adjusted for 197 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 194 | -2.89% |
| 195 | -2.91% |
| 196 | -2.92% |
| 197 | -2.94% |
| 198 | -2.95% |
| 199 | -2.97% |
| 200 | -2.98% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.82% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.