Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Maraehako Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Maraehako Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
37 Valid Reviews
The Maraehako Camping Ground experience has a total of 38 reviews. There are 37 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 37 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 22 |
|
59% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Maraehako Camping Ground valid reviews is 92.43% and is based on 37 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
88.66%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rich | 5/10 | 188 days | 80% |
| Robynne | 10/10 | 339 days | 100% |
| Lee | 10/10 | 370 days | 99% |
| Hilary McQueen | 10/10 | 766 days | 71% |
| kirsty corbett | 10/10 | 1070 days | 40% |
| Kate | 6/10 | 1070 days | 34% |
| Dan | 7/10 | 1710 days | 6% |
| Larnz | 10/10 | 1741 days | 6% |
| Wayne Marks | 10/10 | 1769 days | 5% |
| Kate Deery | 10/10 | 1769 days | 5% |
| Eugene Lim | 10/10 | 1831 days | 5% |
| Hine | 10/10 | 1831 days | 5% |
| Jaz | 10/10 | 1831 days | 5% |
| Alf | 9/10 | 1831 days | 5% |
| Robyn and Bill | 10/10 | 1892 days | 5% |
| Tracy J | 9/10 | 2166 days | 4% |
| Bert | 8/10 | 2197 days | 4% |
| Johannes | 10/10 | 2227 days | 4% |
| Simone and Dave | 10/10 | 2500 days | 4% |
| Wendy | 9/10 | 2531 days | 4% |
| Hana | 10/10 | 2531 days | 4% |
| Mrs Smith | 10/10 | 2531 days | 4% |
| Brent Park | 10/10 | 2622 days | 3% |
| Loretta Taukamo-Spence | 9/10 | 2806 days | 3% |
| Shirley McMurray | 7/10 | 3229 days | 2% |
| Pam Williams | 9/10 | 3261 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 9/10 | 3413 days | 2% |
| Philippa and Adam | 8/10 | 3564 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Bowles | 10/10 | 3598 days | 1% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 10/10 | 3607 days | 1% |
| Hannah Green | 9/10 | 3632 days | 1% |
| james thompson | 10/10 | 3719 days | 1% |
| Vincent S. | 9/10 | 3932 days | 1% |
| Charlene | 10/10 | 3992 days | 1% |
| Philippe Chiasson | 9/10 | 4286 days | 0% |
| Patricia Busbach | 10/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
| P Bukal | 10/10 | 5373 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Maraehako Camping Ground experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.36% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 42 days. However the Maraehako Camping Ground experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Maraehako Camping Ground experience has been adjusted for 165 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 162 | -3.30% |
| 163 | -3.32% |
| 164 | -3.34% |
| 165 | -3.36% |
| 166 | -3.38% |
| 167 | -3.40% |
| 168 | -3.42% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.76% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.