Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Blue Lakes and Tasman Glacier Walks.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Blue Lakes and Tasman Glacier Walks

Valid Reviews

23 Valid Reviews

The Blue Lakes and Tasman Glacier Walks experience has a total of 24 reviews. There are 23 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 23 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 8
35%
9/10 6
26%
8/10 6
26%
7/10 1
4%
6/10 1
4%
5/10 1
4%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.96% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Blue Lakes and Tasman Glacier Walks valid reviews is 86.96% and is based on 23 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

18 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 23 valid reviews, the experience has 18 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 18 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 7
39%
9/10 4
22%
8/10 5
28%
7/10 1
6%
6/10 1
6%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Blue Lakes and Tasman Glacier Walks face-to-face reviews is 88.33% and is based on 18 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

90.26%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Andrew Hammond 9/10 1930 days 100%
Raphaele 10/10 2204 days 89%
Romy de Boer 10/10 2594 days 73%
Rick Stockdale 10/10 2856 days 62%
Kathi 10/10 3217 days 47%
Suzanne Vermeulen 8/10 3330 days 41%
James Webster 5/10 3538 days 25%
Sue Strebe 7/10 3593 days 28%
Nora Zeitz 9/10 3998 days 14%
jessica newton 9/10 4274 days 2%
Marcel 6/10 4298 days 1%
Peter Moederer 10/10 4322 days 0%
Delore 8/10 4663 days 19%
Sabrina Germany 8/10 4665 days 19%
Linda Kosters 9/10 4679 days 19%
Barrie Corless 9/10 4698 days 19%
Maggie Leyland 8/10 5026 days 19%
Marco Schoeggl 8/10 5038 days 19%
Ian Watson 10/10 5402 days 19%
Gunda G 10/10 5409 days 19%
Conor Coyle 9/10 5446 days 19%
X Vogel 8/10 5501 days 19%
Gemma Morris 10/10 5514 days 19%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Blue Lakes and Tasman Glacier Walks does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.96% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

91%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.