G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mangahuia Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Mangahuia Campsite
Valid Reviews
70 Valid Reviews
The Mangahuia Campsite experience has a total of 71 reviews. There are 70 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
17% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
77.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mangahuia Campsite valid reviews is 77.29% and is based on 70 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
22 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 70 valid reviews, the experience has 22 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 22 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
14% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 7 |
|
32% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mangahuia Campsite face-to-face reviews is 80.45% and is based on 22 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
74.87%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fine | 6/10 | 39 days | 88% |
| CEV | 8/10 | 101 days | 100% |
| Marit | 8/10 | 101 days | 100% |
| TS | 8/10 | 131 days | 100% |
| Desceul | 6/10 | 376 days | 81% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 376 days | 92% |
| Milly Struthers | 6/10 | 557 days | 73% |
| Christopher | 7/10 | 557 days | 79% |
| Kirsty B | 8/10 | 770 days | 67% |
| Liam Dent | 6/10 | 832 days | 53% |
| Howards | 8/10 | 954 days | 49% |
| @saltyskin | 10/10 | 1076 days | 38% |
| Basil | 8/10 | 1076 days | 37% |
| Caroline | 9/10 | 1135 days | 33% |
| Leet | 9/10 | 1350 days | 18% |
| Emer | 8/10 | 1411 days | 15% |
| Kate | 9/10 | 1562 days | 9% |
| Celeste | 5/10 | 2202 days | 3% |
| Ju | 1/10 | 2202 days | 2% |
| Tessa | 7/10 | 2415 days | 4% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 2568 days | 3% |
| Anders Knutsson | 10/10 | 2626 days | 4% |
| Guillaume | 4/10 | 2627 days | 2% |
| Nadja Kampfhenkel | 6/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Francois & Caroline | 8/10 | 2627 days | 3% |
| Myra Van Dijk | 9/10 | 2960 days | 3% |
| Paul Vinken | 9/10 | 3029 days | 3% |
| Jennifer Duhnke | 6/10 | 3327 days | 2% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 7/10 | 3391 days | 2% |
| Jayma Dancer | 8/10 | 3423 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 8/10 | 3598 days | 2% |
| Clara Bertomeu | 8/10 | 3614 days | 1% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
| Carsten Philipp | 10/10 | 3808 days | 1% |
| Rogier K | 7/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
| David and Stephan | 10/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
| GN100 | 8/10 | 4179 days | 0% |
| Sidney Stokkers | 8/10 | 4179 days | 0% |
| Pelletier | 7/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com | 8/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Janek Belcher | 9/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
| Adele Grandguillot | 7/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
| Sarah Beyeler | 8/10 | 4393 days | 1% |
| Kim Lavener | 7/10 | 4393 days | 1% |
| Hadler | 9/10 | 4395 days | 1% |
| Christine Helleiner | 9/10 | 4395 days | 1% |
| Steffen | 7/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
| Sergey Pronkin | 8/10 | 4397 days | 1% |
| Stina Hultberg | 8/10 | 4398 days | 1% |
| Linus Larsson | 7/10 | 4400 days | 1% |
| Constanza Salas | 10/10 | 4427 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 9/10 | 4431 days | 1% |
| Julia Bonisch | 10/10 | 4437 days | 1% |
| Laura Pleumeekers | 7/10 | 4439 days | 1% |
| Zoe Ross | 4/10 | 4453 days | 1% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 4484 days | 1% |
| Johannes J | 8/10 | 4575 days | 1% |
| ramy | 7/10 | 4728 days | 1% |
| Menu | 9/10 | 4749 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4759 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 10/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4818 days | 1% |
| Boule_de_gomme | 10/10 | 5124 days | 1% |
| Dean | 5/10 | 5199 days | 1% |
| JadesWorld | 7/10 | 5245 days | 1% |
| Ryan Dorsey | 8/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
| Kathleen Brown | 7/10 | 5488 days | 1% |
| Jerry & Floon | 8/10 | 5488 days | 1% |
| Faye & Ben | 8/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mangahuia Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
4.70% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
80%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.