Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Port Jackson Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
51 Valid Reviews
The Port Jackson Campsite experience has a total of 52 reviews. There are 51 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 51 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 26 |
|
51% |
9/10 | 19 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 6 |
|
12% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
93.92% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Port Jackson Campsite valid reviews is 93.92% and is based on 51 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
22 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 51 valid reviews, the experience has 22 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 22 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 8 |
|
36% |
9/10 | 12 |
|
55% |
8/10 | 2 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.73% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Port Jackson Campsite face-to-face reviews is 92.73% and is based on 22 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.80%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Christopher | 10/10 | 60 days | 100% |
Beth | 8/10 | 244 days | 95% |
Rokki Bud | 10/10 | 730 days | 70% |
Jacob Carrapetta | 10/10 | 791 days | 64% |
Nicky | 8/10 | 1034 days | 40% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 1156 days | 30% |
Alex | 10/10 | 1218 days | 26% |
Jenni | 9/10 | 1460 days | 12% |
Gareth | 10/10 | 1765 days | 5% |
Bert | 9/10 | 1796 days | 5% |
Sheryll | 10/10 | 2071 days | 4% |
Ashleigh | 10/10 | 2099 days | 4% |
Krishna Ponguru | 10/10 | 2222 days | 4% |
Michael Smith | 9/10 | 2619 days | 3% |
Fabio Flepp | 10/10 | 2807 days | 3% |
Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2823 days | 3% |
Claire Buckham | 10/10 | 2828 days | 3% |
James Oakes | 10/10 | 2841 days | 3% |
Sarah Stone | 9/10 | 2884 days | 3% |
Rima | 9/10 | 2921 days | 3% |
Patrick Baritz | 10/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
Dave O'Brien | 9/10 | 3203 days | 2% |
Michael | 10/10 | 3291 days | 2% |
Camille Guevel | 10/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
Hans Munster | 10/10 | 3536 days | 1% |
Matthias Bohmert | 9/10 | 3558 days | 1% |
Jurgen Moors | 10/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
James Russell | 9/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
Hannah Watt | 10/10 | 3873 days | 1% |
Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 3903 days | 1% |
Steven Lotrian | 10/10 | 3911 days | 1% |
Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 3937 days | 1% |
Lane | 10/10 | 3956 days | 1% |
sharyn wright | 8/10 | 3987 days | 1% |
GN100 | 10/10 | 3987 days | 1% |
FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4231 days | 0% |
Nigel Shaw | 10/10 | 4231 days | 0% |
Menu | 9/10 | 4252 days | 0% |
Kathy Arthurs | 8/10 | 4262 days | 0% |
Fabian Brand | 9/10 | 4283 days | 0% |
Nora and Edward | 9/10 | 4285 days | 0% |
Markus Frei | 8/10 | 4613 days | 1% |
Jessica Marling | 9/10 | 4636 days | 1% |
Mike & Suzann | 9/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
Kaelin | 10/10 | 4732 days | 1% |
Harald Schmidt | 10/10 | 4978 days | 1% |
Sophie | 9/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
Brent S | 9/10 | 5352 days | 1% |
olafrick | 9/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
Johannes & Jopke Fokkema | 9/10 | 5712 days | 1% |
Lars | 10/10 | 5735 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Port Jackson Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.55% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.