G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taranaki Falls.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Taranaki Falls
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Taranaki Falls experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls valid reviews is 86.77% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
61 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 61 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 21 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls face-to-face reviews is 86.39% and is based on 61 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.33%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dee Greig-Dunn | 9/10 | 2179 days | 100% |
| Linnea Sahlberg | 10/10 | 2588 days | 82% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 2847 days | 70% |
| Julia Achatz | 7/10 | 2849 days | 65% |
| Markus Wagner | 9/10 | 2849 days | 70% |
| Katharina Gans | 9/10 | 2857 days | 69% |
| Benedikt Lorenz | 10/10 | 2859 days | 70% |
| Jonas Neumann | 9/10 | 2862 days | 69% |
| Theresa Flach | 10/10 | 2862 days | 70% |
| Daniela Hintermayr | 7/10 | 2863 days | 65% |
| Thomas Klinting | 6/10 | 2863 days | 60% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 8/10 | 2897 days | 67% |
| Tom Rogers | 7/10 | 2911 days | 63% |
| Ulf | 10/10 | 2923 days | 67% |
| Jack Robinson | 10/10 | 2934 days | 66% |
| Robert Elzinga | 8/10 | 3164 days | 55% |
| David Schelensky | 10/10 | 3213 days | 53% |
| Ruven Rintelmann | 9/10 | 3214 days | 53% |
| Daniel Roedel | 8/10 | 3222 days | 52% |
| Catherine Schlachter | 9/10 | 3890 days | 22% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 3890 days | 22% |
| Casandra Prunica | 9/10 | 3917 days | 21% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 3917 days | 21% |
| Anton Thisted | 7/10 | 4247 days | 6% |
| Chantal Mortel | 8/10 | 4285 days | 4% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4352 days | 1% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4352 days | 1% |
| Brigitte | 9/10 | 4358 days | 1% |
| Ron | 8/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 9/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
| Kerstin | 9/10 | 4385 days | 23% |
| Helmut Schmid | 9/10 | 4639 days | 23% |
| Melinda Moir | 9/10 | 4651 days | 23% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 4654 days | 23% |
| Lotte Foged | 9/10 | 4672 days | 23% |
| Dean | 8/10 | 4720 days | 23% |
| Lisa Beutler | 10/10 | 4725 days | 23% |
| Barry Dunster | 10/10 | 4736 days | 23% |
| Rudy Witt | 8/10 | 4752 days | 23% |
| Tina | 9/10 | 4766 days | 23% |
| Ralph & Marloes Meyers | 9/10 | 4979 days | 23% |
| Wheeler | 10/10 | 5000 days | 23% |
| Michael Orme | 7/10 | 5001 days | 22% |
| Tim | 9/10 | 5001 days | 23% |
| Tina Baun | 8/10 | 5003 days | 23% |
| Erica Moorhouse | 8/10 | 5016 days | 23% |
| Dennis & Claudia | 8/10 | 5031 days | 23% |
| Florian | 7/10 | 5032 days | 22% |
| D Oostrum | 9/10 | 5034 days | 23% |
| Mike Peirce | 9/10 | 5370 days | 23% |
| Cecile | 10/10 | 5379 days | 23% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 7/10 | 5386 days | 22% |
| Lousie Hug | 7/10 | 5390 days | 22% |
| Schubert, Wolfgang & Claudia | 8/10 | 5409 days | 23% |
| ilkal | 8/10 | 5452 days | 23% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 5455 days | 23% |
| usigmund | 8/10 | 5455 days | 23% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 5470 days | 23% |
| Bue Verrept | 8/10 | 5473 days | 23% |
| Monika Wenzel | 10/10 | 5474 days | 23% |
| Louis Duhaime | 9/10 | 5477 days | 23% |
| Jeanette Larsen | 9/10 | 5478 days | 23% |
| johannac | 8/10 | 5585 days | 23% |
| BVanW | 9/10 | 5702 days | 23% |
| Ralph Boese | 10/10 | 5730 days | 23% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Taranaki Falls does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.40% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.