G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Taranaki Falls.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Taranaki Falls
Valid Reviews
65 Valid Reviews
The Taranaki Falls experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 22 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.77% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls valid reviews is 86.77% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
61 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 61 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
| 9/10 | 21 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 17 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Taranaki Falls face-to-face reviews is 86.39% and is based on 61 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.39%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dee Greig-Dunn | 9/10 | 2562 days | 100% |
| Linnea Sahlberg | 10/10 | 2971 days | 77% |
| Kati Behrendt | 10/10 | 3230 days | 62% |
| Julia Achatz | 7/10 | 3232 days | 58% |
| Markus Wagner | 9/10 | 3232 days | 61% |
| Katharina Gans | 9/10 | 3240 days | 61% |
| Benedikt Lorenz | 10/10 | 3242 days | 62% |
| Jonas Neumann | 9/10 | 3245 days | 61% |
| Theresa Flach | 10/10 | 3245 days | 61% |
| Daniela Hintermayr | 7/10 | 3246 days | 57% |
| Thomas Klinting | 6/10 | 3246 days | 52% |
| Wouter Bleckmann | 8/10 | 3280 days | 58% |
| Tom Rogers | 7/10 | 3294 days | 54% |
| Ulf | 10/10 | 3306 days | 58% |
| Jack Robinson | 10/10 | 3317 days | 57% |
| Robert Elzinga | 8/10 | 3547 days | 43% |
| David Schelensky | 10/10 | 3596 days | 41% |
| Ruven Rintelmann | 9/10 | 3597 days | 40% |
| Daniel Roedel | 8/10 | 3605 days | 40% |
| Catherine Schlachter | 9/10 | 4273 days | 2% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 4273 days | 2% |
| Casandra Prunica | 9/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Janina Zwerver | 8/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Anton Thisted | 7/10 | 4630 days | 23% |
| Chantal Mortel | 8/10 | 4668 days | 25% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4735 days | 25% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4735 days | 25% |
| Brigitte | 9/10 | 4741 days | 25% |
| Ron | 8/10 | 4757 days | 25% |
| Laurits and Bettina | 9/10 | 4760 days | 25% |
| Kerstin | 9/10 | 4768 days | 25% |
| Helmut Schmid | 9/10 | 5022 days | 25% |
| Melinda Moir | 9/10 | 5034 days | 25% |
| Lars | 8/10 | 5037 days | 25% |
| Lotte Foged | 9/10 | 5055 days | 25% |
| Dean | 8/10 | 5103 days | 25% |
| Lisa Beutler | 10/10 | 5108 days | 25% |
| Barry Dunster | 10/10 | 5119 days | 25% |
| Rudy Witt | 8/10 | 5135 days | 25% |
| Tina | 9/10 | 5149 days | 25% |
| Ralph & Marloes Meyers | 9/10 | 5362 days | 25% |
| Wheeler | 10/10 | 5383 days | 25% |
| Michael Orme | 7/10 | 5384 days | 23% |
| Tim | 9/10 | 5384 days | 25% |
| Tina Baun | 8/10 | 5386 days | 25% |
| Erica Moorhouse | 8/10 | 5399 days | 25% |
| Dennis & Claudia | 8/10 | 5414 days | 25% |
| Florian | 7/10 | 5415 days | 23% |
| D Oostrum | 9/10 | 5417 days | 25% |
| Mike Peirce | 9/10 | 5753 days | 25% |
| Cecile | 10/10 | 5762 days | 25% |
| Jannievan Osnabrugge | 7/10 | 5769 days | 23% |
| Lousie Hug | 7/10 | 5773 days | 23% |
| Schubert, Wolfgang & Claudia | 8/10 | 5792 days | 25% |
| ilkal | 8/10 | 5835 days | 25% |
| katesc | 9/10 | 5838 days | 25% |
| usigmund | 8/10 | 5838 days | 25% |
| vernenal | 10/10 | 5853 days | 25% |
| Bue Verrept | 8/10 | 5856 days | 25% |
| Monika Wenzel | 10/10 | 5857 days | 25% |
| Louis Duhaime | 9/10 | 5860 days | 25% |
| Jeanette Larsen | 9/10 | 5861 days | 25% |
| johannac | 8/10 | 5968 days | 25% |
| BVanW | 9/10 | 6085 days | 25% |
| Ralph Boese | 10/10 | 6113 days | 25% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Taranaki Falls does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.39% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.