Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
174 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 178 reviews. There are 174 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 174 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
87.24% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 87.24% and is based on 174 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 174 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
82.59%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nico | 5/10 | 188 days | 77% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 249 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 280 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 308 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 339 days | 74% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 339 days | 90% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 339 days | 90% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 339 days | 95% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 339 days | 95% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 339 days | 97% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 339 days | 97% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 370 days | 94% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 400 days | 93% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 431 days | 92% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 461 days | 90% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 461 days | 90% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 980 days | 47% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1101 days | 35% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1131 days | 29% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1162 days | 31% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1223 days | 27% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1223 days | 26% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1254 days | 24% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1284 days | 22% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1315 days | 8% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1345 days | 19% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1435 days | 14% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1435 days | 14% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1680 days | 6% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1800 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1800 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 1922 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 1922 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2106 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2166 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2166 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2350 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2411 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2441 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2441 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2472 days | 4% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2472 days | 4% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2499 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2500 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2500 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2531 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2531 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2531 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2531 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2592 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2592 days | 4% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2714 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2806 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2869 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 2910 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 2916 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 2923 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 2929 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 2987 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3065 days | 3% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3071 days | 3% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3085 days | 3% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3115 days | 3% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3133 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3159 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3165 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3174 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3202 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3219 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3229 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3229 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3237 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3245 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3293 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3297 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3310 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3318 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3328 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3334 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3384 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3413 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3417 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3486 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3502 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3505 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3514 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3535 days | 2% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3539 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3541 days | 2% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3546 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3599 days | 2% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3607 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3624 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3658 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3663 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3665 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3674 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3710 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3711 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3718 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3809 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3810 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 3869 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 3871 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 3871 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 3877 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 3936 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 3974 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 3991 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 3998 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4001 days | 1% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4237 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4267 days | 0% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4267 days | 0% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4305 days | 0% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4357 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4388 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4510 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4691 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4691 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4691 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5023 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5024 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5024 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5032 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5050 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5051 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5108 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5135 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5370 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5372 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5377 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5379 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5405 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5407 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5409 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5409 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5413 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5667 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5698 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5766 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5768 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5783 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5833 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5853 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6081 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6137 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.34% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.