Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tapotupotu Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
174 Valid Reviews
The Tapotupotu Campsite experience has a total of 178 reviews. There are 174 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 174 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 63 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 53 |
|
30% |
| 8/10 | 35 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
87.24% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite valid reviews is 87.24% and is based on 174 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
49 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 174 valid reviews, the experience has 49 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tapotupotu Campsite face-to-face reviews is 87.76% and is based on 49 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
82.57%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nico | 5/10 | 200 days | 78% |
| McLean | 10/10 | 261 days | 100% |
| Debbie | 8/10 | 292 days | 97% |
| Celine | 6/10 | 320 days | 84% |
| BR | 5/10 | 351 days | 74% |
| Evelína | 7/10 | 351 days | 90% |
| Loui | 7/10 | 351 days | 90% |
| Evelína | 8/10 | 351 days | 95% |
| Sara | 8/10 | 351 days | 95% |
| Gamini jay | 10/10 | 351 days | 97% |
| Mladen Savov | 10/10 | 351 days | 97% |
| Tim Schmitter | 8/10 | 382 days | 93% |
| Apple | 9/10 | 412 days | 93% |
| John Holschier | 9/10 | 443 days | 91% |
| Katie | 9/10 | 473 days | 90% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 473 days | 90% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 992 days | 46% |
| Gstto | 8/10 | 1113 days | 35% |
| Mike Englisch | 6/10 | 1143 days | 28% |
| Ngaire & Kylie 'The Darlings' | 8/10 | 1174 days | 30% |
| Stefanie | 10/10 | 1235 days | 26% |
| Trevor Russell | 9/10 | 1235 days | 26% |
| Paulo | 8/10 | 1266 days | 23% |
| Dan | 9/10 | 1296 days | 22% |
| Ammar | 1/10 | 1327 days | 8% |
| Toni | 10/10 | 1357 days | 18% |
| Hannah | 8/10 | 1447 days | 13% |
| Amy | 10/10 | 1447 days | 14% |
| Sandy | 10/10 | 1692 days | 6% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 1812 days | 5% |
| Joannda | 10/10 | 1812 days | 5% |
| Sarah Coughlan | 9/10 | 1934 days | 5% |
| Kris | 10/10 | 1934 days | 5% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 2118 days | 5% |
| Orlane | 2/10 | 2178 days | 2% |
| Adrian Tyrrell | 9/10 | 2178 days | 4% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 2362 days | 4% |
| Kate | 8/10 | 2423 days | 4% |
| Jeff | 9/10 | 2453 days | 4% |
| Kerik | 8/10 | 2453 days | 4% |
| Kristen | 7/10 | 2484 days | 4% |
| JT | 7/10 | 2484 days | 4% |
| JAN SCOTT | 10/10 | 2511 days | 4% |
| Michael S | 5/10 | 2512 days | 3% |
| Andy and Julia | 8/10 | 2512 days | 4% |
| Cameron | 8/10 | 2543 days | 4% |
| Chrissy | 10/10 | 2543 days | 4% |
| Don Strachan | 8/10 | 2543 days | 4% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 2543 days | 4% |
| Nielsa | 7/10 | 2604 days | 3% |
| Markus | 9/10 | 2604 days | 4% |
| Stefano Clerici | 10/10 | 2726 days | 3% |
| The Olivers | 10/10 | 2818 days | 3% |
| Amy Lord | 9/10 | 2881 days | 3% |
| Manuel Fessler | 6/10 | 2922 days | 2% |
| Zelie Frechin | 9/10 | 2928 days | 3% |
| Navdeep Singh | 10/10 | 2935 days | 3% |
| Ewan Evans | 9/10 | 2941 days | 3% |
| Laura | 9/10 | 2999 days | 3% |
| Viola Cube | 9/10 | 3077 days | 3% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3083 days | 3% |
| Kathrina Handschuh | 10/10 | 3097 days | 3% |
| Fifi and Jay | 10/10 | 3127 days | 3% |
| Haley Bailey | 8/10 | 3145 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 3171 days | 2% |
| Julia Weiss | 10/10 | 3177 days | 2% |
| Artemis | 9/10 | 3186 days | 2% |
| Alun Owen | 10/10 | 3199 days | 2% |
| Yulia Sukhankina | 10/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
| Blu Ice | 10/10 | 3231 days | 2% |
| John Smith | 8/10 | 3241 days | 2% |
| Mark Haydon | 7/10 | 3241 days | 2% |
| Matthias Wohlgemuth | 7/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
| Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
| Martina Boss | 9/10 | 3272 days | 2% |
| Matthew Hassam | 10/10 | 3272 days | 2% |
| Geoffrey McCall | 9/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Maxine Fallot | 10/10 | 3309 days | 2% |
| Ulrica Vilen-Letts | 10/10 | 3322 days | 2% |
| Ernst Mayerhofer | 9/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
| Robert Wolf | 10/10 | 3340 days | 2% |
| Kelsey Nolan | 10/10 | 3346 days | 2% |
| Tim Burnett | 9/10 | 3396 days | 2% |
| Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 3425 days | 2% |
| Paul Busson | 10/10 | 3429 days | 2% |
| Alizee Petit | 7/10 | 3498 days | 2% |
| Gordon Lee | 9/10 | 3514 days | 2% |
| Loz & Jake Masters | 10/10 | 3517 days | 2% |
| Bjarne McDonald | 9/10 | 3526 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3547 days | 2% |
| Hugo Delubac | 9/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 10/10 | 3553 days | 2% |
| Thomas Le Buzulier | 9/10 | 3558 days | 1% |
| Bill Milburn | 8/10 | 3611 days | 2% |
| Janneke Hekhuis | 8/10 | 3619 days | 1% |
| Chris Brasell | 9/10 | 3636 days | 1% |
| Michael Braham | 10/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
| mathieu boustie | 9/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| Chloe Grand | 10/10 | 3675 days | 1% |
| Michelle Rushton | 10/10 | 3677 days | 1% |
| Alexander Gerbe | 5/10 | 3686 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3722 days | 1% |
| Anna Simon | 10/10 | 3723 days | 1% |
| Dennis Biedermann | 10/10 | 3730 days | 1% |
| Annie Crafar | 10/10 | 3730 days | 1% |
| Rebecca Can | 8/10 | 3821 days | 1% |
| Christine Slowiak | 8/10 | 3822 days | 1% |
| Martin Hall-May | 9/10 | 3881 days | 1% |
| Gregory Agnoux | 10/10 | 3883 days | 1% |
| Kurz Werner | 10/10 | 3883 days | 1% |
| Helen Ameis | 9/10 | 3889 days | 1% |
| Christian Wiertelorz | 8/10 | 3948 days | 1% |
| Dave Ruijter | 9/10 | 3986 days | 1% |
| Ian | 9/10 | 4003 days | 1% |
| Tobias Herrmann | 10/10 | 4010 days | 1% |
| Michiel Brunsveld | 9/10 | 4013 days | 1% |
| Heather Kingston | 8/10 | 4064 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 8/10 | 4249 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 4279 days | 0% |
| Boneschova Jarka | 10/10 | 4279 days | 0% |
| Leon Courtney | 10/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
| Thomas Dequidt | 8/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| Johannes | 8/10 | 4337 days | 0% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Clarissa Krote | 10/10 | 4350 days | 0% |
| Valerio Penita | 8/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Adam Balcar | 10/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| kiwifamily2 | 9/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 10/10 | 4400 days | 1% |
| julian | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
| Frederic Birke | 9/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
| Harry Findeis | 7/10 | 4684 days | 1% |
| Will and Taylor | 9/10 | 4703 days | 1% |
| Patricia Busbach | 6/10 | 4703 days | 1% |
| Regan Fairley | 10/10 | 4703 days | 1% |
| Keegan Jansen | 10/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
| Richard Rite | 9/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
| Sebastian Hol | 8/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
| Schael | 10/10 | 5044 days | 1% |
| Daniel & Manuela | 10/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
| Luis Valenzuela | 9/10 | 5062 days | 1% |
| Renate Rohlin | 4/10 | 5063 days | 0% |
| Claudia & Julian | 10/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
| Leander Siegert | 9/10 | 5067 days | 1% |
| Shelly_Brian | 10/10 | 5069 days | 1% |
| Lisa Beutler | 9/10 | 5120 days | 1% |
| Theresa | 9/10 | 5147 days | 1% |
| Thierry Meylan | 9/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
| Danielle | 9/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 9/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
| Harald Schmidt | 9/10 | 5391 days | 1% |
| Andreas Rath | 10/10 | 5391 days | 1% |
| Nikolas Woelzel | 7/10 | 5408 days | 1% |
| Hartheib Schmid | 8/10 | 5409 days | 1% |
| Anja Allphell | 10/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
| Denis | 9/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
| Bernard Gastaud | 4/10 | 5419 days | 0% |
| Valerie | 10/10 | 5420 days | 1% |
| Jared Hambley | 9/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| Sven | 10/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| Bolt | 8/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
| Cymen Crick | 9/10 | 5679 days | 1% |
| Martin | 9/10 | 5710 days | 1% |
| Maria Lorentzen | 8/10 | 5778 days | 1% |
| Krause | 8/10 | 5780 days | 1% |
| Leanne Rogan | 10/10 | 5795 days | 1% |
| klinger | 10/10 | 5845 days | 1% |
| Frank de Voogd | 9/10 | 5865 days | 1% |
| BryonyS | 6/10 | 6093 days | 1% |
| Halley | 10/10 | 6149 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tapotupotu Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.35% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
85%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.