Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Marian Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
65 Valid Reviews
The Lake Marian Track experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 30 |
|
46% |
9/10 | 18 |
|
28% |
8/10 | 10 |
|
15% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.31% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Marian Track valid reviews is 90.31% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
53 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 53 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 22 |
|
42% |
9/10 | 17 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 9 |
|
17% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Marian Track face-to-face reviews is 90.57% and is based on 53 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.78%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Brennon Lanigan | 3/10 | 1922 days | 60% |
Davina | 10/10 | 2134 days | 100% |
Nicki Chow | 10/10 | 2134 days | 100% |
Kay Simpkin | 8/10 | 2808 days | 69% |
Matthew | 9/10 | 2887 days | 66% |
Anna | 10/10 | 2940 days | 64% |
Justine Langero | 9/10 | 2958 days | 63% |
Kristin Pogue | 8/10 | 3173 days | 53% |
Sarah Boettcher | 7/10 | 3175 days | 50% |
Pascale Lemieux | 7/10 | 3175 days | 50% |
Molly Bogeberg | 9/10 | 3180 days | 53% |
Christian Bobsu | 10/10 | 3184 days | 53% |
Stephen Timko | 9/10 | 3185 days | 53% |
Joerg | 9/10 | 3192 days | 52% |
Michael L | 9/10 | 3193 days | 52% |
Celine | 10/10 | 3193 days | 53% |
Jorge Gonzoleis | 7/10 | 3197 days | 49% |
Joaquin Gruffat | 10/10 | 3207 days | 52% |
Ben and Pauline | 7/10 | 3213 days | 48% |
Yaiv Cohen | 9/10 | 3222 days | 51% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3227 days | 51% |
Hannes Puediger | 8/10 | 3249 days | 49% |
Konstantin Bücheler | 9/10 | 3278 days | 49% |
Oliver Pester | 10/10 | 3566 days | 36% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3606 days | 34% |
Oliver Andres | 10/10 | 3641 days | 33% |
Anja Weppler | 10/10 | 3899 days | 21% |
Jan-Peter Stripp | 10/10 | 3900 days | 21% |
Leandra Thiele | 8/10 | 3902 days | 21% |
Jonas Hessel | 10/10 | 3929 days | 20% |
Sheila Galpin | 9/10 | 3930 days | 20% |
Wouter Bosch | 10/10 | 3973 days | 18% |
Emmanuelle Brevier | 8/10 | 3980 days | 17% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 3986 days | 17% |
Alex | 8/10 | 3991 days | 17% |
Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 3993 days | 17% |
Daniel McAlpine | 8/10 | 3996 days | 17% |
Kellie | 9/10 | 3996 days | 17% |
Elizabeth Stenhouse | 10/10 | 4266 days | 5% |
Patrick | 10/10 | 4281 days | 4% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 4281 days | 4% |
Pia Pitkala | 9/10 | 4286 days | 4% |
Tanja Schlagermann | 10/10 | 4299 days | 4% |
Alexander Mukasa | 9/10 | 4299 days | 3% |
Lydia Kleinkoenen | 10/10 | 4301 days | 3% |
Jessica Grewe | 10/10 | 4301 days | 3% |
Katharina Littlemann | 9/10 | 4309 days | 3% |
Leticia Martin | 9/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
Jonathan Vondette | 10/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
Meryem Buchwitz | 8/10 | 4400 days | 22% |
Jaap & Susanne | 8/10 | 4671 days | 22% |
DJohnson | 10/10 | 4844 days | 23% |
Sophie Burge | 9/10 | 5005 days | 22% |
Jacob | 10/10 | 5015 days | 23% |
K Dahmer | 10/10 | 5021 days | 23% |
Julia | 10/10 | 5026 days | 23% |
Matthias & Ceristiane | 9/10 | 5380 days | 22% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 10/10 | 5395 days | 23% |
Matthiis & Femke | 7/10 | 5400 days | 21% |
Jann Clar | 10/10 | 5402 days | 23% |
Deede K | 9/10 | 5491 days | 22% |
eric14 | 10/10 | 5574 days | 23% |
JanW | 8/10 | 5739 days | 22% |
Christian Moll | 7/10 | 5743 days | 21% |
Cuz da Maori | 10/10 | 6244 days | 23% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Marian Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.17% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.