Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Marian Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
65 Valid Reviews
The Lake Marian Track experience has a total of 65 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 65 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 30 |
|
46% |
9/10 | 18 |
|
28% |
8/10 | 10 |
|
15% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.31% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Marian Track valid reviews is 90.31% and is based on 65 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
53 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 65 valid reviews, the experience has 53 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 22 |
|
42% |
9/10 | 17 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 9 |
|
17% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
9% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.57% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Marian Track face-to-face reviews is 90.57% and is based on 53 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.02%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Brennon Lanigan | 3/10 | 1845 days | 58% |
Davina | 10/10 | 2057 days | 100% |
Nicki Chow | 10/10 | 2057 days | 100% |
Kay Simpkin | 8/10 | 2731 days | 69% |
Matthew | 9/10 | 2810 days | 66% |
Anna | 10/10 | 2863 days | 64% |
Justine Langero | 9/10 | 2881 days | 63% |
Kristin Pogue | 8/10 | 3096 days | 53% |
Sarah Boettcher | 7/10 | 3098 days | 50% |
Pascale Lemieux | 7/10 | 3098 days | 50% |
Molly Bogeberg | 9/10 | 3103 days | 53% |
Christian Bobsu | 10/10 | 3107 days | 54% |
Stephen Timko | 9/10 | 3108 days | 53% |
Joerg | 9/10 | 3115 days | 53% |
Michael L | 9/10 | 3116 days | 53% |
Celine | 10/10 | 3116 days | 53% |
Jorge Gonzoleis | 7/10 | 3120 days | 49% |
Joaquin Gruffat | 10/10 | 3130 days | 53% |
Ben and Pauline | 7/10 | 3136 days | 49% |
Yaiv Cohen | 9/10 | 3145 days | 51% |
magdalena gomez haedo | 10/10 | 3150 days | 52% |
Hannes Puediger | 8/10 | 3172 days | 50% |
Konstantin Bücheler | 9/10 | 3201 days | 49% |
Oliver Pester | 10/10 | 3490 days | 37% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3529 days | 35% |
Oliver Andres | 10/10 | 3564 days | 34% |
Anja Weppler | 10/10 | 3822 days | 22% |
Jan-Peter Stripp | 10/10 | 3823 days | 22% |
Leandra Thiele | 8/10 | 3825 days | 22% |
Jonas Hessel | 10/10 | 3852 days | 21% |
Sheila Galpin | 9/10 | 3853 days | 21% |
Wouter Bosch | 10/10 | 3896 days | 19% |
Emmanuelle Brevier | 8/10 | 3903 days | 18% |
Daryl | 10/10 | 3909 days | 18% |
Alex | 8/10 | 3914 days | 18% |
Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 3916 days | 18% |
Daniel McAlpine | 8/10 | 3919 days | 17% |
Kellie | 9/10 | 3919 days | 18% |
Elizabeth Stenhouse | 10/10 | 4189 days | 6% |
Patrick | 10/10 | 4204 days | 5% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 4204 days | 5% |
Pia Pitkala | 9/10 | 4209 days | 5% |
Tanja Schlagermann | 10/10 | 4222 days | 5% |
Alexander Mukasa | 9/10 | 4222 days | 4% |
Lydia Kleinkoenen | 10/10 | 4224 days | 4% |
Jessica Grewe | 10/10 | 4224 days | 4% |
Katharina Littlemann | 9/10 | 4232 days | 4% |
Leticia Martin | 9/10 | 4301 days | 1% |
Jonathan Vondette | 10/10 | 4301 days | 1% |
Meryem Buchwitz | 8/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
Jaap & Susanne | 8/10 | 4594 days | 20% |
DJohnson | 10/10 | 4767 days | 20% |
Sophie Burge | 9/10 | 4928 days | 20% |
Jacob | 10/10 | 4938 days | 20% |
K Dahmer | 10/10 | 4944 days | 20% |
Julia | 10/10 | 4949 days | 20% |
Matthias & Ceristiane | 9/10 | 5303 days | 20% |
Nicky and Andy Prescott | 10/10 | 5318 days | 20% |
Matthiis & Femke | 7/10 | 5323 days | 19% |
Jann Clar | 10/10 | 5325 days | 20% |
Deede K | 9/10 | 5414 days | 20% |
eric14 | 10/10 | 5497 days | 20% |
JanW | 8/10 | 5662 days | 20% |
Christian Moll | 7/10 | 5666 days | 19% |
Cuz da Maori | 10/10 | 6167 days | 20% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Marian Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.14% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.