Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake

Valid Reviews

53 Valid Reviews

The Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake experience has a total of 53 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
34%
9/10 15
28%
8/10 16
30%
7/10 1
2%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.30% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake valid reviews is 88.30% and is based on 53 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

45 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 53 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
33%
9/10 13
29%
8/10 13
29%
7/10 1
2%
6/10 3
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

89.13%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Violette Z 10/10 2134 days 100%
Chris 10/10 2165 days 99%
Huan Quintero 9/10 2561 days 80%
Carl von Horstig 8/10 2970 days 61%
Dana 8/10 3204 days 51%
Rob and Nicole 8/10 3223 days 50%
Harold Booy 10/10 3232 days 51%
Gena Bond 8/10 3237 days 50%
Leif Marienlund 9/10 3244 days 50%
Anouk Goemans 9/10 3295 days 47%
Danny 9/10 3302 days 47%
Jakob Lovdahl 6/10 3306 days 41%
Marine Audoire 10/10 3533 days 37%
Manu T 10/10 3534 days 37%
Mathilde 9/10 3547 days 36%
Phlippe 9/10 3547 days 36%
Floriane Desnoyer 10/10 3548 days 37%
Jeff Barth 8/10 3548 days 36%
Kim 9/10 3576 days 35%
Hannah Stiles 10/10 3620 days 33%
Diego Pablos 8/10 3645 days 32%
Suzanne Vermeulen 8/10 3687 days 30%
Jam Boggomann 8/10 4018 days 15%
Bartlomiej Berger 10/10 4027 days 15%
Anna Grafenstein 8/10 4262 days 4%
jefft 8/10 4267 days 4%
Benoit Irissou 9/10 4297 days 3%
Crousse 8/10 4297 days 3%
Sapir Lifshitz 10/10 4346 days 1%
Maya Barad 10/10 4346 days 1%
Marc Schnelanburger 9/10 4349 days 1%
Elly Zimmer 9/10 4363 days 0%
Clive West 9/10 4417 days 22%
Clarissa Hanck 10/10 4637 days 22%
Pieke 10/10 4662 days 22%
Loesje 8/10 4721 days 22%
Marieke 6/10 4738 days 19%
Knorr Bracher 9/10 4756 days 22%
Kali Lohman 9/10 4768 days 22%
Ton Franke 9/10 4768 days 22%
Margreet Hanemaaijer 8/10 5013 days 22%
Elaine 10/10 5037 days 22%
Ursi Meier 10/10 5050 days 22%
Frank & Ruth 10/10 5377 days 22%
female40 10/10 5378 days 22%
Stoop 8/10 5379 days 22%
Steve & Pearl Baker 10/10 5383 days 22%
Nicolas 9/10 5394 days 22%
Stefanie E 10/10 5855 days 22%
Sarah Smith 7/10 5874 days 21%
HovingL 6/10 6104 days 19%
Peter Bowen-Simpkins 8/10 6112 days 22%
KathrinS 8/10 6112 days 22%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.12% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.