Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake

Valid Reviews

53 Valid Reviews

The Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake experience has a total of 53 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 18
34%
9/10 15
28%
8/10 16
30%
7/10 1
2%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.30% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake valid reviews is 88.30% and is based on 53 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

45 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 53 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
33%
9/10 13
29%
8/10 13
29%
7/10 1
2%
6/10 3
7%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake face-to-face reviews is 88.00% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

89.33%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Violette Z 10/10 1692 days 100%
Chris 10/10 1723 days 93%
Huan Quintero 9/10 2119 days 72%
Carl von Horstig 8/10 2528 days 58%
Dana 8/10 2762 days 51%
Rob and Nicole 8/10 2781 days 50%
Harold Booy 10/10 2790 days 51%
Gena Bond 8/10 2795 days 50%
Leif Marienlund 9/10 2802 days 50%
Anouk Goemans 9/10 2853 days 48%
Danny 9/10 2860 days 48%
Jakob Lovdahl 6/10 2864 days 42%
Marine Audoire 10/10 3091 days 41%
Manu T 10/10 3092 days 41%
Mathilde 9/10 3105 days 40%
Phlippe 9/10 3105 days 40%
Floriane Desnoyer 10/10 3106 days 40%
Jeff Barth 8/10 3106 days 40%
Kim 9/10 3134 days 39%
Hannah Stiles 10/10 3178 days 38%
Diego Pablos 8/10 3203 days 36%
Suzanne Vermeulen 8/10 3245 days 35%
Jam Boggomann 8/10 3576 days 24%
Bartlomiej Berger 10/10 3585 days 25%
Anna Grafenstein 8/10 3820 days 16%
jefft 8/10 3825 days 16%
Benoit Irissou 9/10 3855 days 15%
Crousse 8/10 3855 days 15%
Sapir Lifshitz 10/10 3904 days 14%
Maya Barad 10/10 3904 days 14%
Marc Schnelanburger 9/10 3907 days 14%
Elly Zimmer 9/10 3921 days 13%
Clive West 9/10 3975 days 12%
Clarissa Hanck 10/10 4195 days 4%
Pieke 10/10 4220 days 4%
Loesje 8/10 4279 days 2%
Marieke 6/10 4296 days 1%
Knorr Bracher 9/10 4314 days 0%
Kali Lohman 9/10 4326 days 0%
Ton Franke 9/10 4326 days 0%
Margreet Hanemaaijer 8/10 4571 days 15%
Elaine 10/10 4595 days 15%
Ursi Meier 10/10 4608 days 15%
Frank & Ruth 10/10 4935 days 15%
female40 10/10 4936 days 15%
Stoop 8/10 4937 days 15%
Steve & Pearl Baker 10/10 4941 days 15%
Nicolas 9/10 4952 days 15%
Stefanie E 10/10 5413 days 15%
Sarah Smith 7/10 5432 days 14%
HovingL 6/10 5662 days 13%
Peter Bowen-Simpkins 8/10 5670 days 15%
KathrinS 8/10 5670 days 15%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rocky Mountain and Diamond Lake does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.09% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.