Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Nugget Point / Tokata.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nugget Point / Tokata
Valid Reviews
116 Valid Reviews
The Nugget Point / Tokata experience has a total of 118 reviews. There are 116 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 116 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 55 |
|
47% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 21 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.81% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Nugget Point / Tokata valid reviews is 91.81% and is based on 116 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
102 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 116 valid reviews, the experience has 102 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 102 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 48 |
|
47% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.67% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Nugget Point / Tokata face-to-face reviews is 91.67% and is based on 102 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
93.43%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah | 10/10 | 875 days | 100% |
| Rebecka | 10/10 | 1879 days | 8% |
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 2550 days | 5% |
| Sampo Uravirta | 7/10 | 2633 days | 5% |
| Samantha Brewin | 8/10 | 2712 days | 5% |
| C Clarke | 10/10 | 2967 days | 4% |
| Natasha | 7/10 | 3019 days | 3% |
| Oliver Francis | 9/10 | 3019 days | 4% |
| Lieke vol Velde | 9/10 | 3038 days | 4% |
| Bob | 10/10 | 3040 days | 4% |
| Luke | 8/10 | 3050 days | 4% |
| Hailey S | 9/10 | 3060 days | 4% |
| Diego Casanova | 10/10 | 3076 days | 4% |
| Claire | 10/10 | 3082 days | 4% |
| Anne | 9/10 | 3083 days | 4% |
| Anna Dalby | 10/10 | 3083 days | 4% |
| Beatrice and Cyrill | 10/10 | 3240 days | 3% |
| Monia Sassella | 9/10 | 3278 days | 3% |
| Claire | 8/10 | 3281 days | 3% |
| Benedikt Maus | 8/10 | 3295 days | 3% |
| Laura Munguira Vadillo | 9/10 | 3297 days | 3% |
| Rodrigo | 9/10 | 3299 days | 3% |
| A Schultz | 8/10 | 3300 days | 3% |
| Cori Schultz | 7/10 | 3301 days | 3% |
| Dominique | 9/10 | 3302 days | 3% |
| Jeroen | 8/10 | 3305 days | 3% |
| Stephan Ophelders | 9/10 | 3310 days | 3% |
| Clayton Hunniford | 6/10 | 3313 days | 2% |
| Sandra | 9/10 | 3321 days | 3% |
| Lothen | 10/10 | 3322 days | 3% |
| Maike Santelmann | 10/10 | 3329 days | 3% |
| Niclas Ullno | 7/10 | 3342 days | 2% |
| Martina | 10/10 | 3348 days | 3% |
| Lisa | 7/10 | 3350 days | 2% |
| Matthias Hofer | 10/10 | 3388 days | 3% |
| Ronja and Lena | 10/10 | 3394 days | 3% |
| Pierre and Alexandra | 10/10 | 3398 days | 2% |
| Mathieu Brun | 10/10 | 3406 days | 2% |
| Emma Rochester | 10/10 | 3446 days | 2% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 9/10 | 3541 days | 2% |
| Robin Sommer | 10/10 | 3703 days | 1% |
| Fanny DeBon | 10/10 | 3765 days | 1% |
| Bartlomiej Berger | 10/10 | 3772 days | 1% |
| Julian | 9/10 | 4026 days | 0% |
| Reto | 9/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
| Mirjam Betschart | 10/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
| Tobias Gehring | 10/10 | 4061 days | 0% |
| Arthur Langlume | 10/10 | 4065 days | 0% |
| Bill | 10/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4070 days | 0% |
| Alacchi Moustier | 10/10 | 4083 days | 0% |
| Derek Knight | 10/10 | 4084 days | 0% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 4091 days | 0% |
| John Davis | 9/10 | 4100 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 8/10 | 4102 days | 0% |
| Gal Bero | 10/10 | 4104 days | 0% |
| Evyatar Karni | 10/10 | 4104 days | 0% |
| Marie | 10/10 | 4392 days | 1% |
| AnnaM | 9/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
| Claire | 9/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
| Malgorzata | 9/10 | 4411 days | 1% |
| Przemystaw Tymizyszyn | 8/10 | 4411 days | 1% |
| Rogier Ramaker | 8/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| Melvin Groenhof | 8/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 10/10 | 4414 days | 1% |
| Maxime | 10/10 | 4419 days | 1% |
| Jim Woodruff | 9/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| Jeanne Moustier | 10/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
| Lis Bon | 10/10 | 4466 days | 1% |
| Karin Genyn | 9/10 | 4483 days | 1% |
| Alex Laidlaw | 9/10 | 4504 days | 1% |
| Meryem Buchwitz | 9/10 | 4510 days | 1% |
| Karin Laurev | 8/10 | 4781 days | 1% |
| Michael & Janet | 8/10 | 4782 days | 1% |
| Inge Davbbert | 10/10 | 4784 days | 1% |
| Sabine & Stefan | 10/10 | 4785 days | 1% |
| Manuela Weber | 9/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
| Nico Welagen | 8/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
| Lesley | 10/10 | 4832 days | 1% |
| Arnoldus Bergmans | 9/10 | 4867 days | 1% |
| Sally Reeves | 10/10 | 5117 days | 1% |
| John & Lorraine | 8/10 | 5117 days | 1% |
| Brock Wagner | 9/10 | 5120 days | 1% |
| Frank & Ruth | 10/10 | 5122 days | 1% |
| Juergen Wolf | 10/10 | 5128 days | 1% |
| Tim Laurent | 9/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
| henriket | 10/10 | 5132 days | 1% |
| Louise van der Hyden | 10/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
| Iko | 8/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
| Grumbach | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
| Matthys Kikke | 8/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5154 days | 1% |
| Celia Murphy | 10/10 | 5156 days | 1% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
| Calvin Parsons | 10/10 | 5166 days | 1% |
| Montys | 10/10 | 5289 days | 1% |
| Kurt | 9/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
| Ian Tainsh | 10/10 | 5485 days | 1% |
| Benedict Fluthman | 10/10 | 5493 days | 1% |
| paddywhack | 9/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5516 days | 1% |
| T. Timmers | 9/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
| Lasse Olesen | 8/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
| Annette Schmitt | 10/10 | 5525 days | 1% |
| Vincente Garrido | 8/10 | 5526 days | 1% |
| Joel K | 9/10 | 5529 days | 1% |
| Rachel & Barak | 10/10 | 5529 days | 1% |
| Sibille Fischer | 10/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
| Jonathan Angela | 8/10 | 5545 days | 1% |
| John J | 8/10 | 5545 days | 1% |
| Elizabeth E | 8/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
| tanh | 9/10 | 5578 days | 1% |
| alasiac | 10/10 | 5593 days | 1% |
| Silvia Huerlimann | 9/10 | 5837 days | 1% |
| Christian Moll | 9/10 | 5853 days | 1% |
| OdiliaF | 10/10 | 5856 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Nugget Point / Tokata does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.59% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.