Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.17%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 227 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 622 days | 82% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1109 days | 36% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2235 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2480 days | 4% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2631 days | 4% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 2935 days | 3% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 2964 days | 3% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3149 days | 3% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3247 days | 2% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3262 days | 2% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3279 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3296 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3337 days | 2% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3351 days | 2% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3556 days | 2% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3556 days | 2% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3557 days | 2% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3557 days | 2% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3558 days | 2% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3564 days | 2% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3574 days | 2% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3574 days | 2% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3652 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 3805 days | 1% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4304 days | 0% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4306 days | 0% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4327 days | 0% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4327 days | 0% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4328 days | 0% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4366 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4635 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4640 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4752 days | 1% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5029 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5033 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5048 days | 1% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5049 days | 1% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5062 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5065 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5128 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5360 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5389 days | 1% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5390 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5418 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5418 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5422 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5428 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5453 days | 1% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 5754 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 5769 days | 1% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 5788 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 5789 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5789 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 5795 days | 1% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 5801 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5804 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 5815 days | 1% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 5815 days | 1% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5841 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 5857 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 5869 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5884 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 5983 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6089 days | 1% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6089 days | 1% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6108 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6113 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6113 days | 1% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6117 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6117 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6121 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.12% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.