Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Matheson Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
110 Valid Reviews
The Lake Matheson Walk experience has a total of 110 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 110 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 4 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk valid reviews is 86.00% and is based on 110 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
95 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 110 valid reviews, the experience has 95 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 95 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
27% |
| 9/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Matheson Walk face-to-face reviews is 85.79% and is based on 95 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.16%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 230 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 625 days | 82% |
| Mike Robertson | 10/10 | 1112 days | 36% |
| Susanne | 10/10 | 2238 days | 4% |
| Flatlanders | 7/10 | 2483 days | 4% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2634 days | 4% |
| Katrina | 10/10 | 2938 days | 3% |
| Tony Wilcomes | 7/10 | 2967 days | 3% |
| Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 3152 days | 3% |
| Jasmin Thuess | 6/10 | 3250 days | 2% |
| John Farley | 5/10 | 3265 days | 2% |
| Jair | 10/10 | 3282 days | 2% |
| Chris Schmolz | 10/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
| Colin Fisher | 10/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
| Katrina Sedl | 10/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
| Allie Nertz | 10/10 | 3299 days | 2% |
| Sigrid Duus | 7/10 | 3303 days | 2% |
| Mads Nielsen | 8/10 | 3303 days | 2% |
| Jake Bullin | 8/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Dylan Smyth | 7/10 | 3340 days | 2% |
| Rae Hoath | 8/10 | 3354 days | 2% |
| Mathilde | 9/10 | 3559 days | 2% |
| Phlippe | 9/10 | 3559 days | 2% |
| Caleigh | 10/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
| Jeff Barth | 9/10 | 3560 days | 2% |
| Helene Christensen | 10/10 | 3561 days | 2% |
| Sofie Madson | 10/10 | 3561 days | 2% |
| Navina | 7/10 | 3567 days | 2% |
| Lucy Murray | 8/10 | 3577 days | 2% |
| Brenda Oomen | 8/10 | 3577 days | 2% |
| Alina Hummel | 8/10 | 3588 days | 2% |
| Udo Wagner | 5/10 | 3655 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 8/10 | 3698 days | 1% |
| Dianne van der Wal | 7/10 | 3808 days | 1% |
| Roeland Driessen | 9/10 | 4003 days | 1% |
| Sheila Galpin | 10/10 | 4307 days | 0% |
| Douglas Dean | 8/10 | 4309 days | 0% |
| Libby | 6/10 | 4330 days | 0% |
| Xavier | 9/10 | 4330 days | 0% |
| Colin Billington | 9/10 | 4331 days | 0% |
| Lionel | 7/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
| Paul Wallace | 8/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
| Marc Schnelanburger | 9/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Nicolas Trezeguet | 10/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
| Kim Maertens | 9/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
| Ron Stenhouse | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
| Abby Rescr | 8/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
| Helen Dean | 10/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
| Dave Mertzig | 8/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
| Lorna and Seb | 8/10 | 4677 days | 1% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4681 days | 1% |
| Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4755 days | 1% |
| Dovis Heinemann | 10/10 | 5023 days | 1% |
| Norman UK | 9/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
| Evelyn Mackie | 10/10 | 5032 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 10/10 | 5033 days | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 9/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
| Lucy Duffy | 9/10 | 5042 days | 1% |
| Beeny | 7/10 | 5049 days | 1% |
| Tim & Judith | 8/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Karin | 9/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Kolen | 8/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
| Randewyk | 8/10 | 5052 days | 1% |
| Jessica Lane | 6/10 | 5065 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 10/10 | 5068 days | 1% |
| Dorthe | 10/10 | 5131 days | 1% |
| Les and Carole Savins | 8/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
| Harry Simpson | 9/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
| Marc Edwards | 10/10 | 5363 days | 1% |
| Peter Cade | 8/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Palmer | 9/10 | 5391 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 5/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
| Kauzta | 10/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
| Pein van Nosrt | 8/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
| katjarege | 10/10 | 5405 days | 1% |
| Julie Pasquignon | 8/10 | 5406 days | 1% |
| Ini & Cees | 8/10 | 5407 days | 1% |
| Mr & Mrs Mackie | 8/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
| Teum and Orselien | 9/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| Hvid | 10/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| Helen Keighley | 9/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
| John Clarkson | 10/10 | 5431 days | 1% |
| Kristie | 8/10 | 5456 days | 1% |
| Schumacher | 9/10 | 5757 days | 1% |
| Rob | 7/10 | 5772 days | 1% |
| Bouwma | 9/10 | 5791 days | 1% |
| Silvia Kern | 9/10 | 5792 days | 1% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 5792 days | 1% |
| Kevin and Teresa | 7/10 | 5798 days | 1% |
| nigelst | 9/10 | 5804 days | 1% |
| Michael and Tanja Kreugel | 10/10 | 5807 days | 1% |
| Sally Hall | 5/10 | 5818 days | 1% |
| Susi Schoetzler | 8/10 | 5818 days | 1% |
| sophiep | 9/10 | 5844 days | 1% |
| niekv | 8/10 | 5845 days | 1% |
| Mark Coffey | 9/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
| Primavesi | 9/10 | 5872 days | 1% |
| Emily and Alex | 9/10 | 5887 days | 1% |
| linus | 9/10 | 5986 days | 1% |
| AndyEngland | 8/10 | 6092 days | 1% |
| JonK | 7/10 | 6092 days | 1% |
| Dave Ashun | 9/10 | 6111 days | 1% |
| CraigB | 10/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| EricS | 8/10 | 6116 days | 1% |
| MundschanGermany | 10/10 | 6120 days | 1% |
| Rissmann | 10/10 | 6120 days | 1% |
| Sarah Bridge | 9/10 | 6124 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Matheson Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.12% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.