G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Copland Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Copland Track
Valid Reviews
37 Valid Reviews
The Copland Track experience has a total of 37 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 14 |
|
38% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
24% |
| 8/10 | 8 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.76% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Copland Track valid reviews is 86.76% and is based on 37 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
30 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 37 valid reviews, the experience has 30 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 30 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 8 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Copland Track face-to-face reviews is 89.00% and is based on 30 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
86.04%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Billz | 6/10 | 1787 days | 100% |
| Car R | 10/10 | 2850 days | 68% |
| hiker15 | 2/10 | 2881 days | 30% |
| Rebecca Pierce | 9/10 | 2942 days | 63% |
| Kirsty Smith | 10/10 | 2944 days | 64% |
| Karine Dransart | 10/10 | 2947 days | 64% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 10/10 | 2950 days | 64% |
| Regina Baum | 8/10 | 3192 days | 52% |
| Florian Baum | 7/10 | 3192 days | 49% |
| Remi Lopez | 9/10 | 3207 days | 52% |
| David Tholander | 7/10 | 3207 days | 48% |
| Yarden Oliva | 9/10 | 3209 days | 51% |
| Dan | 10/10 | 3299 days | 48% |
| Beau Corazon | 9/10 | 3305 days | 47% |
| Charlotte and Julien | 9/10 | 3305 days | 47% |
| Dawn Mulligan | 8/10 | 3595 days | 34% |
| Helen Olsson | 10/10 | 3895 days | 21% |
| Tina Hilbich | 8/10 | 3901 days | 20% |
| Igor | 9/10 | 3919 days | 20% |
| Guillaim Terrangle | 8/10 | 3935 days | 19% |
| Evyatar Karni | 10/10 | 3981 days | 17% |
| Gal Bero | 10/10 | 3981 days | 17% |
| Ariadna & Omer | 10/10 | 4009 days | 16% |
| Maria Klister | 8/10 | 4268 days | 4% |
| Katey Justice | 8/10 | 4279 days | 4% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4279 days | 4% |
| Joshua Perry | 9/10 | 4280 days | 4% |
| Molly Ladd | 10/10 | 4280 days | 4% |
| Sabisch Moritz | 9/10 | 4284 days | 3% |
| Daniel Jezak | 7/10 | 4294 days | 3% |
| Francis Runge | 10/10 | 4298 days | 3% |
| Andreas Garbin | 9/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
| Loesje | 7/10 | 4435 days | 21% |
| Sabine | 10/10 | 5293 days | 22% |
| Colby Smythe | 8/10 | 5383 days | 22% |
| Richard | 10/10 | 5384 days | 22% |
| BenH | 10/10 | 5408 days | 22% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Copland Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.