Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Queen Charlotte Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
250 Valid Reviews
The Queen Charlotte Track experience has a total of 250 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 250 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 65 |
|
26% |
9/10 | 65 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 66 |
|
26% |
7/10 | 33 |
|
13% |
6/10 | 10 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
84.12% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Queen Charlotte Track valid reviews is 84.12% and is based on 250 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
243 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 250 valid reviews, the experience has 243 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 243 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 59 |
|
24% |
9/10 | 64 |
|
26% |
8/10 | 66 |
|
27% |
7/10 | 33 |
|
14% |
6/10 | 10 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 6 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.70% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Queen Charlotte Track face-to-face reviews is 83.70% and is based on 243 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
84.99%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Malcolm | 6/10 | 2837 days | 87% |
Andy | 9/10 | 2846 days | 100% |
Benedikt Lorenz | 7/10 | 2870 days | 93% |
Jonas Neumann | 9/10 | 2873 days | 98% |
Theresa Flach | 9/10 | 2873 days | 98% |
Alexandra Luerner | 9/10 | 2920 days | 95% |
Frank Bien | 9/10 | 2920 days | 95% |
Sarah | 10/10 | 2922 days | 96% |
Alan Rock | 7/10 | 2925 days | 89% |
Tina Kueffer | 8/10 | 2927 days | 94% |
Wolfgang | 10/10 | 2930 days | 95% |
Favia | 10/10 | 2930 days | 95% |
Daniel Carr | 9/10 | 2931 days | 94% |
romain perroches | 9/10 | 2943 days | 94% |
Soria Chher | 9/10 | 2943 days | 94% |
Alex Schmidt | 10/10 | 2943 days | 95% |
Justine Langero | 9/10 | 2952 days | 93% |
Thomas | 9/10 | 2952 days | 93% |
Gabriel Prerot | 8/10 | 2961 days | 92% |
Bettina Enigl | 9/10 | 2961 days | 92% |
Mikulas and Dominika | 8/10 | 2967 days | 91% |
Benjamin Leboucq | 7/10 | 3163 days | 75% |
Adrien Richard | 7/10 | 3163 days | 75% |
Nicole | 7/10 | 3165 days | 74% |
Johannes Wassner | 8/10 | 3170 days | 78% |
Sylvie Smets | 9/10 | 3171 days | 79% |
Maarten Simons | 9/10 | 3174 days | 79% |
Magali Schwantke | 9/10 | 3178 days | 78% |
Kathrin Redl | 7/10 | 3181 days | 73% |
Luala F | 10/10 | 3182 days | 79% |
Sebastian Heinzelmann | 8/10 | 3182 days | 77% |
Anna Kern | 8/10 | 3182 days | 77% |
Yoomm | 8/10 | 3189 days | 77% |
Mark | 6/10 | 3189 days | 68% |
Robin Stamm | 8/10 | 3189 days | 77% |
Stephan Kirchenbaur | 7/10 | 3190 days | 73% |
Johannes Frank | 8/10 | 3192 days | 77% |
Tom Brien | 8/10 | 3195 days | 76% |
Skye Brien | 10/10 | 3195 days | 78% |
Dennis Xuereb | 8/10 | 3198 days | 76% |
Andre | 10/10 | 3198 days | 78% |
Marco | 7/10 | 3203 days | 72% |
Mateusz | 8/10 | 3207 days | 76% |
Ambrosio Loojs | 5/10 | 3227 days | 58% |
Anna Bouteloup | 7/10 | 3227 days | 71% |
Pauline Chailand | 9/10 | 3227 days | 75% |
Anna Stoehr | 6/10 | 3228 days | 65% |
Ulli | 10/10 | 3229 days | 76% |
Kristyna Mokrackoua | 10/10 | 3233 days | 75% |
Philipp | 10/10 | 3235 days | 75% |
Monica Mier | 10/10 | 3237 days | 75% |
Ian Hortop | 9/10 | 3239 days | 74% |
Sara Kuenzi | 7/10 | 3244 days | 70% |
Barna Szakacs | 9/10 | 3265 days | 73% |
Christian Boudreau | 8/10 | 3268 days | 72% |
Evie Sel | 9/10 | 3287 days | 71% |
Robyn Hallowell | 10/10 | 3288 days | 72% |
Selma Krap | 9/10 | 3288 days | 71% |
Maxi Woedel | 9/10 | 3288 days | 71% |
Philipp Richter | 8/10 | 3322 days | 68% |
Katherine Halliday | 8/10 | 3550 days | 54% |
Nina Müller | 6/10 | 3576 days | 46% |
Katie Stillman | 7/10 | 3634 days | 46% |
leila rowbotham | 8/10 | 3645 days | 47% |
Polly Rider | 8/10 | 3655 days | 47% |
Astrid Egesten | 8/10 | 3658 days | 47% |
Alex | 7/10 | 3904 days | 29% |
Josefin Lind | 9/10 | 3905 days | 31% |
Herman Holmgist | 10/10 | 3905 days | 31% |
Christina | 7/10 | 3908 days | 29% |
Kathrin Lerch | 8/10 | 3908 days | 30% |
Erik Nestlez | 10/10 | 3909 days | 31% |
Sanne Meijer | 10/10 | 3909 days | 31% |
Jenny Finch | 8/10 | 3922 days | 29% |
Drame Mahmadou | 7/10 | 3923 days | 28% |
Adele Grandguillot | 5/10 | 3923 days | 23% |
Anne Haenchen | 7/10 | 3926 days | 28% |
Kathi | 7/10 | 3926 days | 28% |
Christine Helleiner | 9/10 | 3927 days | 29% |
Felicitas | 9/10 | 3927 days | 29% |
Steffen | 4/10 | 3929 days | 19% |
Sergey Pronkin | 9/10 | 3929 days | 29% |
Jan Kerkhoff | 10/10 | 3930 days | 30% |
Friederike Kranzin | 9/10 | 3933 days | 29% |
Guillaume | 8/10 | 3935 days | 29% |
Pierre Gentile | 4/10 | 3937 days | 19% |
Jennifer Garner | 9/10 | 3939 days | 29% |
Ian Garner | 9/10 | 3939 days | 29% |
Marinette | 9/10 | 3941 days | 29% |
Karel | 9/10 | 3942 days | 28% |
Kristyna | 8/10 | 3942 days | 28% |
Toke Frederiksen | 4/10 | 3949 days | 18% |
Verena | 8/10 | 3953 days | 27% |
Benjamin | 8/10 | 3953 days | 27% |
Lars Borgaa | 8/10 | 3966 days | 27% |
Susser | 9/10 | 3978 days | 26% |
Chen Levin | 7/10 | 3983 days | 24% |
Lara Mroseck | 10/10 | 3983 days | 26% |
Robert Geissler | 10/10 | 3983 days | 26% |
Moulou Ludonvic | 8/10 | 3990 days | 25% |
Elisabeth Boulier | 8/10 | 3990 days | 25% |
Mark Wiggington | 8/10 | 4254 days | 8% |
Bertiethebus | 10/10 | 4260 days | 8% |
Audrey Ripoche | 9/10 | 4267 days | 7% |
Miranda | 7/10 | 4268 days | 7% |
Bertrand Gilles | 7/10 | 4273 days | 6% |
Debiesse | 7/10 | 4279 days | 6% |
Galen Licht | 10/10 | 4279 days | 7% |
Thomas | 8/10 | 4289 days | 6% |
Karina Gratz | 3/10 | 4295 days | 3% |
Luisa | 9/10 | 4296 days | 5% |
Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4363 days | 1% |
Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4363 days | 1% |
Nadine | 8/10 | 4363 days | 1% |
Roux | 8/10 | 4371 days | 0% |
Timo Maschke | 10/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
Jackie and Brian | 8/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
Darren Abbott | 7/10 | 4374 days | 0% |
Alexandra van den Brack | 7/10 | 4378 days | 0% |
Anne and John | 9/10 | 4380 days | 33% |
Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 10/10 | 4381 days | 34% |
Barbara | 10/10 | 4381 days | 34% |
Denise Albrecht | 10/10 | 4385 days | 34% |
Sally | 10/10 | 4385 days | 34% |
Megan Child | 10/10 | 4398 days | 34% |
Adrian Weidell | 8/10 | 4586 days | 33% |
Jonathan Tuthill | 10/10 | 4641 days | 34% |
Jen Sweeting | 8/10 | 4643 days | 33% |
Johannes Mullner | 5/10 | 4646 days | 26% |
Def Fem | 8/10 | 4651 days | 33% |
Axel Irriger | 6/10 | 4658 days | 29% |
Lucy Wilde | 6/10 | 4659 days | 29% |
Dick Stewart | 7/10 | 4661 days | 31% |
Janet | 9/10 | 4661 days | 33% |
Lee Lloyd | 9/10 | 4666 days | 33% |
Ryan Pynappels | 8/10 | 4667 days | 33% |
Carl & Desiree Potter | 10/10 | 4668 days | 34% |
John & Ray Calder | 7/10 | 4668 days | 31% |
D Collier | 10/10 | 4669 days | 34% |
E Smudde | 8/10 | 4669 days | 33% |
Rachel | 9/10 | 4670 days | 33% |
Yves & Sylvia | 8/10 | 4670 days | 33% |
Andy Bridgman | 8/10 | 4670 days | 33% |
Hendrik F | 8/10 | 4670 days | 33% |
Hardy | 8/10 | 4671 days | 33% |
Alan Findlay | 8/10 | 4671 days | 33% |
Fannette Peyreplane | 9/10 | 4673 days | 33% |
Schweiger | 8/10 | 4680 days | 33% |
Margaret Wendell | 8/10 | 4683 days | 33% |
Frank & Julia | 6/10 | 4684 days | 29% |
Bradley | 7/10 | 4730 days | 31% |
Rene Rypkema | 7/10 | 4730 days | 31% |
Steve & Maggie | 4/10 | 4748 days | 22% |
Peter, Noelle & Susanne | 6/10 | 4750 days | 29% |
Cornelia & Josef | 9/10 | 4759 days | 33% |
Jan & Marian | 10/10 | 4759 days | 34% |
Benjamin Meier | 8/10 | 4762 days | 33% |
Remco te Lintum | 8/10 | 4763 days | 33% |
P Stanton | 10/10 | 4964 days | 34% |
Lisa Milton | 10/10 | 4984 days | 34% |
Weez18 | 10/10 | 4991 days | 34% |
Eric Grant | 9/10 | 4996 days | 33% |
Eric & Liz McKean | 10/10 | 5004 days | 34% |
Janice OConnor | 9/10 | 5005 days | 33% |
Van Vliet | 7/10 | 5009 days | 31% |
Walter Buschta | 10/10 | 5013 days | 34% |
Richard Broughton | 9/10 | 5016 days | 33% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5016 days | 33% |
Alan Munday | 9/10 | 5020 days | 33% |
Pam & Rob Tellwright | 9/10 | 5026 days | 33% |
Agnes McMillan | 10/10 | 5034 days | 34% |
Gerd Pagel | 10/10 | 5035 days | 34% |
Jill Dean | 9/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
Katharina Dierkes | 8/10 | 5037 days | 33% |
Saglibene | 10/10 | 5040 days | 34% |
Jarvis and Anja | 8/10 | 5040 days | 33% |
Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 5043 days | 33% |
Karen Phillips | 10/10 | 5047 days | 34% |
Isbabel | 9/10 | 5048 days | 33% |
Fred West | 8/10 | 5049 days | 33% |
Dizey | 10/10 | 5081 days | 34% |
Buttie | 10/10 | 5081 days | 34% |
Shoe | 10/10 | 5112 days | 34% |
Wal & Lynne | 8/10 | 5316 days | 33% |
Chris & Rob | 8/10 | 5319 days | 33% |
davidm239 | 9/10 | 5326 days | 33% |
Martin | 10/10 | 5326 days | 34% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5356 days | 34% |
hooperuk | 10/10 | 5356 days | 34% |
Hans and Astrid | 9/10 | 5364 days | 33% |
Kevin F | 8/10 | 5369 days | 33% |
Theresa | 10/10 | 5375 days | 34% |
Antoine Del | 7/10 | 5377 days | 31% |
Tanya | 9/10 | 5380 days | 33% |
Peter Brown | 9/10 | 5383 days | 33% |
Susan & Richard | 10/10 | 5387 days | 34% |
SB | 8/10 | 5389 days | 33% |
Johan | 9/10 | 5389 days | 33% |
Jonathan Martin | 8/10 | 5390 days | 33% |
Tim | 8/10 | 5394 days | 33% |
Pierre Pilon | 10/10 | 5395 days | 34% |
Ed & Pat Mitchell | 8/10 | 5395 days | 33% |
Ivo Braakhuis | 6/10 | 5395 days | 29% |
Hans & Huxi | 8/10 | 5395 days | 33% |
Mieke Knoops | 9/10 | 5397 days | 33% |
Pascal Auber | 10/10 | 5401 days | 34% |
Becky | 10/10 | 5408 days | 34% |
Caitriona Doyle | 10/10 | 5409 days | 34% |
Adriane | 7/10 | 5411 days | 31% |
Hanz | 10/10 | 5411 days | 34% |
Pizzanelli | 8/10 | 5414 days | 33% |
Chris Kevin | 9/10 | 5424 days | 33% |
Elizabeth E | 8/10 | 5431 days | 33% |
Markus | 8/10 | 5431 days | 33% |
EA Anders | 5/10 | 5432 days | 26% |
deanlaw | 10/10 | 5460 days | 34% |
gemmav | 9/10 | 5461 days | 33% |
eliertv | 7/10 | 5461 days | 31% |
Furger | 10/10 | 5479 days | 34% |
Chris Leach | 8/10 | 5484 days | 33% |
Sabrina Bazin | 9/10 | 5485 days | 33% |
Colin S | 5/10 | 5485 days | 26% |
Bernard Misfud | 9/10 | 5488 days | 33% |
Hansjoerg Ehrmann | 7/10 | 5488 days | 31% |
Thorben Thede | 7/10 | 5489 days | 31% |
Shane and Kate Wilkinson | 10/10 | 5499 days | 34% |
arminh | 6/10 | 5500 days | 29% |
Graham Butt | 10/10 | 5500 days | 34% |
Dermot Bryne | 10/10 | 5500 days | 34% |
Evan | 9/10 | 5538 days | 33% |
miniappleses | 9/10 | 5538 days | 33% |
arthurw | 10/10 | 5594 days | 34% |
richardh | 9/10 | 5602 days | 33% |
SiljaH | 5/10 | 5711 days | 26% |
jenniferk | 10/10 | 5721 days | 34% |
scottl | 9/10 | 5721 days | 33% |
Colin Church | 9/10 | 5721 days | 33% |
Marc_N | 10/10 | 5722 days | 34% |
Andrew Biddle | 7/10 | 5723 days | 31% |
SBlake | 8/10 | 5726 days | 33% |
AnjaN | 10/10 | 5728 days | 34% |
Falk | 8/10 | 5737 days | 33% |
WiebkeS | 9/10 | 5737 days | 33% |
AmyBarrett | 10/10 | 5737 days | 34% |
ChrisD | 10/10 | 5737 days | 34% |
GeraldMcNamora | 8/10 | 5737 days | 33% |
StijnH | 8/10 | 5738 days | 33% |
Lars Haf | 8/10 | 5739 days | 33% |
AnjaChrist | 9/10 | 5739 days | 33% |
Tiemen | 9/10 | 5741 days | 33% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Queen Charlotte Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.83% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.