Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk

Valid Reviews

47 Valid Reviews

The Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk experience has a total of 48 reviews. There are 47 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 16
34%
9/10 15
32%
8/10 10
21%
7/10 4
9%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.09% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk valid reviews is 88.09% and is based on 47 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

44 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 47 valid reviews, the experience has 44 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
34%
9/10 14
32%
8/10 10
23%
7/10 3
7%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.18% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk face-to-face reviews is 88.18% and is based on 44 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

88.60%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Susanne 9/10 3261 days 100%
Sylvain Schiber 9/10 3331 days 94%
Sylvain Chanton 10/10 3336 days 94%
Julian Gury 9/10 3344 days 92%
Tobi 10/10 3545 days 75%
Rolf 8/10 3559 days 72%
Robin Brandl 8/10 3573 days 71%
Laura Moore 8/10 3575 days 71%
Frenziska Schmid 9/10 3577 days 71%
Tim Ronke 9/10 3577 days 71%
Emily Pohlmann 7/10 3581 days 67%
George 10/10 3588 days 71%
Maxim Motheus 10/10 3600 days 70%
Max Mustermann 9/10 3600 days 69%
Carmen Pramstaller 10/10 3607 days 69%
Taylor Fabricius 8/10 3608 days 68%
Kyle Johnson 8/10 3608 days 68%
Markus Wabing 6/10 3610 days 59%
Roland Fischer 10/10 3613 days 69%
Annett Kiessling 10/10 3613 days 69%
Tatiana Racheneau 10/10 3619 days 68%
Johannes Marold 9/10 3621 days 67%
Flora Kiessling 10/10 3621 days 68%
Jakub Trojanek 7/10 3646 days 61%
Tereza Fajfroua 9/10 3647 days 65%
Julia Martin 8/10 3652 days 64%
Elsa Caniato 8/10 3667 days 63%
Till 8/10 3670 days 62%
Marilyn and Steffen 7/10 3685 days 58%
Meredith Griffiths 10/10 4295 days 7%
Jared Hermansson 9/10 4334 days 3%
Alex 7/10 4366 days 0%
Petr Dvorak 9/10 4678 days 45%
Anne Rodofsen 8/10 4752 days 45%
Jens Moller 8/10 5030 days 45%
Brian Livesey 9/10 5042 days 45%
Magda Savels 5/10 5059 days 34%
John Jacobs 9/10 5094 days 45%
Todd Pang 10/10 5387 days 45%
Anika Jedelsky 10/10 5404 days 45%
J Holden 9/10 5409 days 45%
Barbara & Sebastian 10/10 5770 days 45%
Anne Veser 9/10 5788 days 45%
selinab 10/10 5851 days 45%
discerner 10/10 5888 days 45%
richards1 9/10 5983 days 45%
Pavol 10/10 6212 days 45%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.20% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

90%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.