Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk
Valid Reviews
47 Valid Reviews
The Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk experience has a total of 48 reviews. There are 47 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.09% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk valid reviews is 88.09% and is based on 47 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
44 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 47 valid reviews, the experience has 44 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 15 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk face-to-face reviews is 88.18% and is based on 44 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
88.34%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Susanne | 9/10 | 2963 days | 100% |
| Sylvain Schiber | 9/10 | 3033 days | 94% |
| Sylvain Chanton | 10/10 | 3038 days | 95% |
| Julian Gury | 9/10 | 3046 days | 93% |
| Tobi | 10/10 | 3247 days | 76% |
| Rolf | 8/10 | 3261 days | 72% |
| Robin Brandl | 8/10 | 3275 days | 71% |
| Laura Moore | 8/10 | 3277 days | 71% |
| Frenziska Schmid | 9/10 | 3279 days | 72% |
| Tim Ronke | 9/10 | 3279 days | 72% |
| Emily Pohlmann | 7/10 | 3283 days | 66% |
| George | 10/10 | 3290 days | 72% |
| Maxim Motheus | 10/10 | 3302 days | 71% |
| Max Mustermann | 9/10 | 3302 days | 70% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 3309 days | 70% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 8/10 | 3310 days | 68% |
| Kyle Johnson | 8/10 | 3310 days | 68% |
| Markus Wabing | 6/10 | 3312 days | 57% |
| Roland Fischer | 10/10 | 3315 days | 70% |
| Annett Kiessling | 10/10 | 3315 days | 70% |
| Tatiana Racheneau | 10/10 | 3321 days | 69% |
| Johannes Marold | 9/10 | 3323 days | 68% |
| Flora Kiessling | 10/10 | 3323 days | 69% |
| Jakub Trojanek | 7/10 | 3348 days | 60% |
| Tereza Fajfroua | 9/10 | 3349 days | 66% |
| Julia Martin | 8/10 | 3354 days | 64% |
| Elsa Caniato | 8/10 | 3369 days | 63% |
| Till | 8/10 | 3372 days | 63% |
| Marilyn and Steffen | 7/10 | 3387 days | 57% |
| Meredith Griffiths | 10/10 | 3997 days | 8% |
| Jared Hermansson | 9/10 | 4036 days | 5% |
| Alex | 7/10 | 4068 days | 0% |
| Petr Dvorak | 9/10 | 4380 days | 19% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 8/10 | 4454 days | 19% |
| Jens Moller | 8/10 | 4732 days | 19% |
| Brian Livesey | 9/10 | 4744 days | 19% |
| Magda Savels | 5/10 | 4761 days | 9% |
| John Jacobs | 9/10 | 4796 days | 19% |
| Todd Pang | 10/10 | 5089 days | 20% |
| Anika Jedelsky | 10/10 | 5106 days | 20% |
| J Holden | 9/10 | 5111 days | 19% |
| Barbara & Sebastian | 10/10 | 5472 days | 20% |
| Anne Veser | 9/10 | 5490 days | 19% |
| selinab | 10/10 | 5553 days | 20% |
| discerner | 10/10 | 5590 days | 20% |
| richards1 | 9/10 | 5685 days | 19% |
| Pavol | 10/10 | 5914 days | 20% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Waikaremoana Great Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.