Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tongariro Northern Circuit.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
75 Valid Reviews
The Tongariro Northern Circuit experience has a total of 75 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 75 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 41 |
|
55% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.47% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tongariro Northern Circuit valid reviews is 91.47% and is based on 75 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
70 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 75 valid reviews, the experience has 70 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.86% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tongariro Northern Circuit face-to-face reviews is 90.86% and is based on 70 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
96.50%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chris | 10/10 | 441 days | 100% |
| Eva Cordemeyer | 9/10 | 2964 days | 3% |
| Matti Picus | 10/10 | 3226 days | 3% |
| Vic Baughen | 9/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 10/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 10/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
| Kallan Mrozek | 9/10 | 3298 days | 2% |
| Frank Fabian | 8/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Sabine Schwandegger | 10/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
| Carmen Stanow | 10/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3545 days | 2% |
| Estelle Coquard | 10/10 | 3548 days | 2% |
| Juliane Mueller | 10/10 | 3551 days | 2% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 3562 days | 2% |
| Bjoern | 10/10 | 3562 days | 2% |
| Floren Hoenschler | 9/10 | 3591 days | 2% |
| Simone De Angiou | 10/10 | 3596 days | 2% |
| William Lendway | 10/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Morgan Fog | 10/10 | 3597 days | 2% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 3605 days | 2% |
| Lorne Paterson | 10/10 | 3605 days | 2% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 10/10 | 3609 days | 2% |
| Kyle Johnson | 9/10 | 3609 days | 2% |
| Tamara | 8/10 | 3609 days | 2% |
| Markus Wabing | 9/10 | 3611 days | 2% |
| Uschi Pongratz | 10/10 | 3611 days | 2% |
| Jessica Ruhland | 10/10 | 3611 days | 2% |
| Edwine | 6/10 | 3624 days | 1% |
| Sara Kuenzi | 9/10 | 3626 days | 2% |
| Maxime Louis | 10/10 | 3627 days | 2% |
| Lukas Schenke | 10/10 | 3656 days | 2% |
| Till | 10/10 | 3671 days | 2% |
| Nicolas Justin | 8/10 | 3933 days | 1% |
| Damaris Mayer | 8/10 | 3982 days | 1% |
| Friederike Kranzin | 10/10 | 4315 days | 0% |
| Marc Engstle | 7/10 | 4330 days | 0% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
| Johannes | 9/10 | 4335 days | 0% |
| Max Grabowski | 10/10 | 4336 days | 0% |
| Victor Herranz | 10/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Nimh Oudhof | 8/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Harel Cliad | 9/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
| Aitnan Melman | 9/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| Alex Artigues | 7/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
| Simon Zenzen | 10/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
| Thomas | 10/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
| Marketa | 10/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
| Lusi13 | 10/10 | 4673 days | 1% |
| Jana Simcikova | 10/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
| Tobi | 10/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
| Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
| Jean Raisin | 10/10 | 4679 days | 1% |
| Tony and Helene | 8/10 | 4681 days | 1% |
| Missy and Chaz | 10/10 | 4683 days | 1% |
| Evyatar Tulipman | 7/10 | 4686 days | 1% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 9/10 | 4753 days | 1% |
| Michael Neumann | 10/10 | 5025 days | 1% |
| Be Groen | 7/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
| Ian Sainsbury | 7/10 | 5052 days | 1% |
| Anika | 9/10 | 5066 days | 1% |
| John Jacobs | 9/10 | 5095 days | 1% |
| snoopidoops | 10/10 | 5098 days | 1% |
| Natascha & Greg | 9/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
| Robin van der Linden | 9/10 | 5355 days | 1% |
| Zoe Barker | 10/10 | 5378 days | 1% |
| R Tearle | 4/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
| Susannah Eduart | 8/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Nadia Husain | 8/10 | 5432 days | 1% |
| anon | 10/10 | 5776 days | 1% |
| Marcel Baessle | 10/10 | 5783 days | 1% |
| Karen Raven | 7/10 | 5866 days | 1% |
| bdevries | 8/10 | 5870 days | 1% |
| Pavol | 10/10 | 6213 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tongariro Northern Circuit does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.30% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
97%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.