Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Tongariro Northern Circuit.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Tongariro Northern Circuit
Valid Reviews
74 Valid Reviews
The Tongariro Northern Circuit experience has a total of 74 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 74 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 40 |
|
54% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tongariro Northern Circuit valid reviews is 91.35% and is based on 74 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
70 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 74 valid reviews, the experience has 70 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 70 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 36 |
|
51% |
| 9/10 | 16 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.86% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Tongariro Northern Circuit face-to-face reviews is 90.86% and is based on 70 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
92.89%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Cordemeyer | 9/10 | 2700 days | 100% |
| Matti Picus | 10/10 | 2962 days | 83% |
| Vic Baughen | 9/10 | 2982 days | 80% |
| Ingrid Kiselka | 10/10 | 2982 days | 81% |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 10/10 | 2993 days | 80% |
| Kallan Mrozek | 9/10 | 3034 days | 77% |
| Frank Fabian | 8/10 | 3051 days | 74% |
| Sabine Schwandegger | 10/10 | 3051 days | 76% |
| Carmen Stanow | 10/10 | 3075 days | 75% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3281 days | 59% |
| Estelle Coquard | 10/10 | 3284 days | 60% |
| Juliane Mueller | 10/10 | 3287 days | 60% |
| Julia | 10/10 | 3298 days | 59% |
| Bjoern | 10/10 | 3298 days | 59% |
| Floren Hoenschler | 9/10 | 3327 days | 56% |
| Simone De Angiou | 10/10 | 3332 days | 56% |
| William Lendway | 10/10 | 3333 days | 56% |
| Morgan Fog | 10/10 | 3333 days | 56% |
| Jan | 10/10 | 3341 days | 56% |
| Lorne Paterson | 10/10 | 3341 days | 56% |
| Taylor Fabricius | 10/10 | 3345 days | 55% |
| Kyle Johnson | 9/10 | 3345 days | 55% |
| Tamara | 8/10 | 3345 days | 54% |
| Markus Wabing | 9/10 | 3347 days | 55% |
| Uschi Pongratz | 10/10 | 3347 days | 55% |
| Jessica Ruhland | 10/10 | 3347 days | 55% |
| Edwine | 6/10 | 3360 days | 44% |
| Sara Kuenzi | 9/10 | 3362 days | 53% |
| Maxime Louis | 10/10 | 3363 days | 54% |
| Lukas Schenke | 10/10 | 3392 days | 52% |
| Till | 10/10 | 3407 days | 51% |
| Nicolas Justin | 8/10 | 3669 days | 31% |
| Damaris Mayer | 8/10 | 3718 days | 28% |
| Friederike Kranzin | 10/10 | 4051 days | 5% |
| Marc Engstle | 7/10 | 4066 days | 3% |
| Matthias Freiling | 10/10 | 4070 days | 4% |
| Johannes | 9/10 | 4071 days | 4% |
| Max Grabowski | 10/10 | 4072 days | 4% |
| Victor Herranz | 10/10 | 4075 days | 4% |
| Nimh Oudhof | 8/10 | 4076 days | 3% |
| Harel Cliad | 9/10 | 4101 days | 2% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4103 days | 2% |
| Aitnan Melman | 9/10 | 4105 days | 1% |
| Alex Artigues | 7/10 | 4106 days | 0% |
| Simon Zenzen | 10/10 | 4106 days | 1% |
| Thomas | 10/10 | 4407 days | 18% |
| Marketa | 10/10 | 4409 days | 18% |
| Lusi13 | 10/10 | 4409 days | 18% |
| Jana Simcikova | 10/10 | 4411 days | 18% |
| Tobi | 10/10 | 4414 days | 18% |
| Jacob Bernhardt | 10/10 | 4414 days | 18% |
| Jean Raisin | 10/10 | 4415 days | 18% |
| Tony and Helene | 8/10 | 4417 days | 17% |
| Missy and Chaz | 10/10 | 4419 days | 18% |
| Evyatar Tulipman | 7/10 | 4422 days | 16% |
| Anne Rodofsen | 9/10 | 4489 days | 18% |
| Michael Neumann | 10/10 | 4761 days | 18% |
| Be Groen | 7/10 | 4766 days | 16% |
| Ian Sainsbury | 7/10 | 4788 days | 16% |
| Anika | 9/10 | 4802 days | 18% |
| John Jacobs | 9/10 | 4831 days | 18% |
| snoopidoops | 10/10 | 4834 days | 18% |
| Natascha & Greg | 9/10 | 4877 days | 18% |
| Robin van der Linden | 9/10 | 5091 days | 18% |
| Zoe Barker | 10/10 | 5114 days | 18% |
| R Tearle | 4/10 | 5118 days | 6% |
| Susannah Eduart | 8/10 | 5120 days | 17% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5123 days | 17% |
| Nadia Husain | 8/10 | 5168 days | 17% |
| anon | 10/10 | 5512 days | 18% |
| Marcel Baessle | 10/10 | 5519 days | 18% |
| Karen Raven | 7/10 | 5602 days | 16% |
| bdevries | 8/10 | 5606 days | 17% |
| Pavol | 10/10 | 5949 days | 18% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Tongariro Northern Circuit does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.65% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.