Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cathedral Cove Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
286 Valid Reviews
The Cathedral Cove Walk experience has a total of 286 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 286 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 96 |
|
34% |
| 9/10 | 82 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 71 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 29 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk valid reviews is 87.59% and is based on 286 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
265 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 286 valid reviews, the experience has 265 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 265 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 88 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 78 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 68 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
87.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cathedral Cove Walk face-to-face reviews is 87.66% and is based on 265 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.09%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michael | 10/10 | 2757 days | 100% |
| Matt McCloskey | 9/10 | 2951 days | 87% |
| Matthias and Adriane | 8/10 | 3219 days | 70% |
| Rachael Gray | 7/10 | 3249 days | 65% |
| Martin Fersebner | 7/10 | 3256 days | 64% |
| Chaulet | 9/10 | 3261 days | 68% |
| Breanna Alexander | 7/10 | 3262 days | 64% |
| Clementine | 10/10 | 3285 days | 67% |
| Claudia Schaefer | 8/10 | 3287 days | 66% |
| Gretha | 10/10 | 3293 days | 67% |
| Peter | 9/10 | 3293 days | 66% |
| Mireia Sanchez | 10/10 | 3295 days | 67% |
| Michael | 8/10 | 3301 days | 65% |
| Kees Mol | 10/10 | 3304 days | 66% |
| Alicia Speisekorn-Gil | 8/10 | 3309 days | 65% |
| David Santos | 9/10 | 3312 days | 65% |
| Dominique | 7/10 | 3315 days | 61% |
| Heike Buchmann | 8/10 | 3315 days | 64% |
| Kat | 9/10 | 3316 days | 65% |
| Ulf | 9/10 | 3318 days | 65% |
| Matthew Long | 7/10 | 3318 days | 61% |
| S Webb | 10/10 | 3318 days | 65% |
| Marie Christ | 10/10 | 3336 days | 64% |
| Frederik Fuchs | 10/10 | 3337 days | 64% |
| Anne | 10/10 | 3351 days | 63% |
| Leigh Dodds | 9/10 | 3361 days | 62% |
| Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3401 days | 60% |
| Bernd Muller | 8/10 | 3528 days | 51% |
| Benjamin Leboucq | 9/10 | 3547 days | 51% |
| Adrien Richard | 9/10 | 3547 days | 51% |
| Sophie Rosenberg | 10/10 | 3549 days | 51% |
| Alexie Lion | 9/10 | 3550 days | 50% |
| Jan Berendsen | 10/10 | 3552 days | 51% |
| Jorge Anderson | 10/10 | 3552 days | 51% |
| Simon Schatz | 7/10 | 3554 days | 47% |
| Camilla Geert | 7/10 | 3559 days | 47% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 3563 days | 49% |
| Luala F | 10/10 | 3566 days | 50% |
| Math Meyer | 10/10 | 3567 days | 50% |
| Virginia Saez | 10/10 | 3567 days | 50% |
| Gessica | 8/10 | 3567 days | 49% |
| Nico Neubauer | 7/10 | 3569 days | 46% |
| Doerte | 10/10 | 3571 days | 50% |
| Benjamin Nager | 8/10 | 3577 days | 48% |
| Julie Miehling | 9/10 | 3578 days | 49% |
| Nico Wedel | 9/10 | 3578 days | 49% |
| Lauren Dinnage | 8/10 | 3579 days | 48% |
| Steve Barnwell | 8/10 | 3579 days | 48% |
| Alex Schott | 9/10 | 3579 days | 49% |
| Andrea Le Stunff | 10/10 | 3580 days | 49% |
| Sunja Abbe | 10/10 | 3582 days | 49% |
| Olga Barathova | 9/10 | 3583 days | 48% |
| Matias Santos | 10/10 | 3585 days | 49% |
| Mira Huckfield | 7/10 | 3585 days | 45% |
| Aaron Stalley | 8/10 | 3587 days | 48% |
| Marcus | 7/10 | 3593 days | 45% |
| Johannes Koch | 7/10 | 3593 days | 45% |
| Louise Boje | 10/10 | 3595 days | 48% |
| Natasha Harbinson | 10/10 | 3597 days | 48% |
| Maddalena Buffoni | 9/10 | 3598 days | 47% |
| Clara Loizeil | 9/10 | 3599 days | 47% |
| Patrick Veber | 5/10 | 3599 days | 36% |
| Hake Dolce | 10/10 | 3600 days | 48% |
| Julien Sene | 9/10 | 3605 days | 47% |
| Sari Aroalho | 8/10 | 3608 days | 46% |
| Briony | 8/10 | 3608 days | 46% |
| Richard Starkeq | 6/10 | 3609 days | 41% |
| Joana Frever | 2/10 | 3610 days | 21% |
| Carmen Pramstaller | 10/10 | 3610 days | 47% |
| Etienne Douse | 7/10 | 3611 days | 44% |
| Sophia Harnisch | 9/10 | 3611 days | 47% |
| Liza Braun | 10/10 | 3611 days | 47% |
| Dario Leyrer | 10/10 | 3611 days | 47% |
| Coral Dawson | 10/10 | 3612 days | 47% |
| Brianna Burd | 9/10 | 3612 days | 47% |
| Daniel Roedel | 10/10 | 3617 days | 47% |
| Jonathan Gourmel | 8/10 | 3617 days | 46% |
| Matte Stemkowitz | 9/10 | 3618 days | 46% |
| Lea and Emmanuel | 9/10 | 3620 days | 46% |
| Petru | 8/10 | 3620 days | 46% |
| Maxima Buisan | 7/10 | 3620 days | 43% |
| Miriam Hack | 8/10 | 3621 days | 46% |
| Annika Locker | 10/10 | 3624 days | 46% |
| Livia and Dave | 8/10 | 3625 days | 45% |
| Nils | 7/10 | 3630 days | 43% |
| Marie Brauherr | 10/10 | 3630 days | 46% |
| Vanesha Patel | 9/10 | 3631 days | 45% |
| Jenny and Till | 10/10 | 3632 days | 46% |
| Clare Pickford | 9/10 | 3633 days | 45% |
| Jonathan and Gulsen | 10/10 | 3635 days | 46% |
| Nico | 8/10 | 3635 days | 45% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 3654 days | 44% |
| Elodie and Gestan | 8/10 | 3657 days | 43% |
| Julia Huesam | 8/10 | 3662 days | 43% |
| Sophie Giblin | 9/10 | 3663 days | 43% |
| Sebastian and Susanna | 9/10 | 3665 days | 43% |
| Sammy Cronin | 8/10 | 3670 days | 43% |
| Fabian Dilly | 8/10 | 3681 days | 42% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 10/10 | 3699 days | 42% |
| Bob Fontaine | 10/10 | 3799 days | 35% |
| Johanna Lidel | 10/10 | 3932 days | 27% |
| Amelie Eschenbach | 10/10 | 3932 days | 27% |
| Anna Birzle | 10/10 | 3932 days | 27% |
| Elisabeth Ringswandl | 9/10 | 3933 days | 27% |
| Thomas Haslbeck | 7/10 | 3933 days | 25% |
| Miriam Burchartz | 9/10 | 3934 days | 27% |
| Ken | 9/10 | 3935 days | 27% |
| Michael Stibor | 7/10 | 3936 days | 25% |
| Nicol | 8/10 | 3973 days | 24% |
| Jamie McArthur | 9/10 | 3995 days | 23% |
| Sibylle and Nadine | 8/10 | 4026 days | 21% |
| Marion and Ralf | 9/10 | 4035 days | 21% |
| Fiona Hawkins | 7/10 | 4272 days | 6% |
| Alex | 10/10 | 4288 days | 5% |
| Becky | 9/10 | 4288 days | 5% |
| Josefin Lind | 9/10 | 4289 days | 5% |
| Herman Holmgist | 10/10 | 4289 days | 5% |
| Carla Oyarzun | 9/10 | 4292 days | 5% |
| Paolo Cases | 8/10 | 4292 days | 5% |
| Lena Hanhart | 10/10 | 4307 days | 4% |
| Vanessa | 4/10 | 4307 days | 2% |
| Tom Hill | 9/10 | 4308 days | 4% |
| Anna Sternberg | 6/10 | 4311 days | 3% |
| Tobias Thull | 8/10 | 4313 days | 4% |
| Katja Kraffzik | 10/10 | 4314 days | 4% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 4316 days | 3% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 4316 days | 3% |
| Anne Courtenay | 8/10 | 4317 days | 3% |
| Andreas Jung | 10/10 | 4317 days | 3% |
| Cindy Benayoum | 9/10 | 4321 days | 3% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4321 days | 3% |
| Lena Wacker | 8/10 | 4321 days | 3% |
| Rikke Petersen | 10/10 | 4328 days | 3% |
| Roland Beer | 10/10 | 4357 days | 1% |
| Rupert | 10/10 | 4364 days | 1% |
| Alineet Gautier | 10/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| Marie Lillieskold | 9/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
| Alexandra Kupper | 8/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
| Brian | 10/10 | 4461 days | 31% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 7/10 | 4644 days | 29% |
| Annika Schmidt | 9/10 | 4649 days | 31% |
| Tim Vennewold | 8/10 | 4662 days | 31% |
| Steen Rausmussen | 9/10 | 4673 days | 31% |
| Jeremy Eng | 7/10 | 4675 days | 29% |
| Julian Roots | 9/10 | 4675 days | 31% |
| Sohie | 9/10 | 4680 days | 31% |
| Neele & Philipp | 7/10 | 4685 days | 29% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4747 days | 31% |
| Soren and Inelase Lindhardbell | 10/10 | 4747 days | 31% |
| Julien Bocherens | 8/10 | 4751 days | 31% |
| Joroen Borkert | 8/10 | 4752 days | 31% |
| Lauret Stulemeyer | 8/10 | 4753 days | 31% |
| Ralph and Leonie | 8/10 | 4757 days | 31% |
| Fahl | 10/10 | 4764 days | 31% |
| tanyap | 7/10 | 4765 days | 29% |
| Terry Coles | 9/10 | 4765 days | 31% |
| Alexander Klein | 8/10 | 4769 days | 31% |
| Adam Hassan | 7/10 | 4770 days | 29% |
| Gerard van de Ven | 7/10 | 4770 days | 29% |
| Doan | 9/10 | 4770 days | 31% |
| Claudia Mueller | 10/10 | 4770 days | 31% |
| Presot | 10/10 | 4770 days | 31% |
| Lutz Huuemorder | 10/10 | 4771 days | 31% |
| Faassen | 9/10 | 4773 days | 31% |
| Julie Lamart | 9/10 | 4774 days | 31% |
| Behrens | 10/10 | 4774 days | 31% |
| Henzen | 8/10 | 4774 days | 31% |
| Roshnie | 8/10 | 4775 days | 31% |
| The Mowbrays | 8/10 | 4775 days | 31% |
| Stevie | 8/10 | 4777 days | 31% |
| Thys | 8/10 | 4777 days | 31% |
| Rob Klauer | 9/10 | 5028 days | 31% |
| Selwindt | 9/10 | 5034 days | 31% |
| Michael Touzer | 9/10 | 5035 days | 31% |
| Steven Hill | 9/10 | 5036 days | 31% |
| Susanne A | 7/10 | 5037 days | 29% |
| Malena | 7/10 | 5040 days | 29% |
| Daniel | 10/10 | 5044 days | 31% |
| Romla | 8/10 | 5047 days | 31% |
| Ronald Veldman | 8/10 | 5047 days | 31% |
| Tom Pratt | 9/10 | 5052 days | 31% |
| Stephan Wolter | 10/10 | 5054 days | 31% |
| Stefan | 9/10 | 5054 days | 31% |
| Gabriele Wendt | 10/10 | 5054 days | 31% |
| Danielle & Jobbe | 7/10 | 5054 days | 29% |
| Langerak | 8/10 | 5056 days | 31% |
| Lepied | 9/10 | 5056 days | 31% |
| Nic Roggeman | 9/10 | 5056 days | 31% |
| Ralf Glaser | 10/10 | 5057 days | 31% |
| Maria Dietrich | 8/10 | 5064 days | 31% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5069 days | 31% |
| Henriette Haugan | 8/10 | 5082 days | 31% |
| Fred Saunders | 9/10 | 5095 days | 31% |
| Pietsch | 9/10 | 5135 days | 31% |
| Marc & Pauline | 9/10 | 5137 days | 31% |
| Marek Woznica | 9/10 | 5138 days | 31% |
| Willem & Lilian | 8/10 | 5140 days | 31% |
| Andy Lever | 10/10 | 5146 days | 31% |
| Herman Plasman | 7/10 | 5146 days | 29% |
| Waldemar Schuler | 9/10 | 5147 days | 31% |
| Theresa | 10/10 | 5147 days | 31% |
| Anders Rathleff | 9/10 | 5147 days | 31% |
| Lardy | 9/10 | 5148 days | 31% |
| JadesWorld | 8/10 | 5161 days | 31% |
| Gary A | 9/10 | 5161 days | 31% |
| Sid | 9/10 | 5161 days | 31% |
| andrew_w | 7/10 | 5375 days | 29% |
| Julie Norton | 9/10 | 5376 days | 31% |
| Oliver Berg | 8/10 | 5389 days | 31% |
| Boi Sagarra | 8/10 | 5389 days | 31% |
| Hannah Roberts | 10/10 | 5403 days | 31% |
| Scheler | 10/10 | 5405 days | 31% |
| Gord Carnochan | 10/10 | 5407 days | 31% |
| Isabel & Tillmann | 10/10 | 5409 days | 31% |
| Adam Hayley | 6/10 | 5418 days | 27% |
| Kat Fleming | 10/10 | 5420 days | 31% |
| Luise Jaeger | 10/10 | 5424 days | 31% |
| Russell Stevens | 10/10 | 5424 days | 31% |
| F Horrex | 8/10 | 5425 days | 31% |
| Jessie Currie | 10/10 | 5425 days | 31% |
| Michael Eck | 10/10 | 5427 days | 31% |
| David and Karin | 10/10 | 5427 days | 31% |
| Brandt | 8/10 | 5431 days | 31% |
| Chamton | 9/10 | 5434 days | 31% |
| Jenny | 9/10 | 5435 days | 31% |
| BigSis | 9/10 | 5618 days | 31% |
| Sophie & Joffrey | 9/10 | 5705 days | 31% |
| kempt | 8/10 | 5710 days | 31% |
| Matt Roper | 9/10 | 5762 days | 31% |
| Matilda Hansson | 9/10 | 5762 days | 31% |
| Kay Beaumont | 10/10 | 5773 days | 31% |
| Mark Ashton | 10/10 | 5777 days | 31% |
| S Millet | 9/10 | 5777 days | 31% |
| Gail Mckinstry | 9/10 | 5777 days | 31% |
| Elisabeth Egerup | 10/10 | 5778 days | 31% |
| John Harrison | 8/10 | 5778 days | 31% |
| Peter Koeck | 10/10 | 5780 days | 31% |
| Jakob Pedersen | 10/10 | 5781 days | 31% |
| Vandeput | 9/10 | 5785 days | 31% |
| Fam Leinden | 8/10 | 5793 days | 31% |
| Lisa Beauchemin | 10/10 | 5794 days | 31% |
| Helen Power | 8/10 | 5794 days | 31% |
| Mick Thexton | 10/10 | 5794 days | 31% |
| Jens van Evp | 10/10 | 5795 days | 31% |
| Max Van der Zalm | 8/10 | 5795 days | 31% |
| Belinda Godhard | 1/10 | 5796 days | 12% |
| Veltmaat NL | 7/10 | 5805 days | 29% |
| Jakob Jurgen | 8/10 | 5813 days | 31% |
| deanlaw | 10/10 | 5844 days | 31% |
| menzel | 10/10 | 5844 days | 31% |
| timgr | 8/10 | 5846 days | 31% |
| Lynn Maguire | 10/10 | 5847 days | 31% |
| blokzyl | 8/10 | 5850 days | 31% |
| braunweiler | 9/10 | 5850 days | 31% |
| jameswhite | 8/10 | 5853 days | 31% |
| hofstetterf | 10/10 | 5859 days | 31% |
| Emma Coltman | 10/10 | 5863 days | 31% |
| rolandop | 10/10 | 5865 days | 31% |
| Antje & Sascha Häusler | 10/10 | 5865 days | 31% |
| Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 5869 days | 31% |
| Susanne Santer | 9/10 | 5869 days | 31% |
| Richard Kesteleyn | 8/10 | 5869 days | 31% |
| Christy | 8/10 | 5871 days | 31% |
| Ricarda | 9/10 | 5871 days | 31% |
| Malinka Nuefeld | 6/10 | 5871 days | 27% |
| Geoff Renshaw | 9/10 | 5872 days | 31% |
| Jessica Clarisse | 9/10 | 5873 days | 31% |
| Lionel Mouesca | 10/10 | 5873 days | 31% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 5873 days | 31% |
| Mike | 9/10 | 5873 days | 31% |
| Wim Put | 8/10 | 5887 days | 31% |
| BryonyS | 10/10 | 6093 days | 31% |
| BouterG | 10/10 | 6101 days | 31% |
| CeesVanW | 8/10 | 6102 days | 31% |
| mikestep | 10/10 | 6105 days | 31% |
| Martien van Brakel | 8/10 | 6105 days | 31% |
| Arjan Muis | 9/10 | 6107 days | 31% |
| DaveV | 9/10 | 6121 days | 31% |
| AmyBarrett | 10/10 | 6121 days | 31% |
| DamienM | 10/10 | 6121 days | 31% |
| StefanGermany1 | 10/10 | 6123 days | 31% |
| FiensG | 8/10 | 6124 days | 31% |
| OdiliaF | 10/10 | 6124 days | 31% |
| Ralph Boese | 8/10 | 6125 days | 31% |
| BrendaM | 10/10 | 6486 days | 31% |
| AlanN316 | 8/10 | 6486 days | 31% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cathedral Cove Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.