Ranking Score Explained

Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Blue Lake Track.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Blue Lake Track

Valid Reviews

31 Valid Reviews

The Blue Lake Track experience has a total of 31 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 31 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
16%
9/10 10
32%
8/10 5
16%
7/10 6
19%
6/10 4
13%
5/10 1
3%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

80.97% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Blue Lake Track valid reviews is 80.97% and is based on 31 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

28 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 31 valid reviews, the experience has 28 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 28 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
18%
9/10 7
25%
8/10 5
18%
7/10 6
21%
6/10 4
14%
5/10 1
4%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

80.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Blue Lake Track face-to-face reviews is 80.00% and is based on 28 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

88.14%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Sebastian 9/10 590 days 100%
Jacqui 9/10 682 days 92%
Liane Bausch 7/10 2519 days 4%
Heyuuiutha Lokithas 7/10 2833 days 3%
Lukas Havlicek 9/10 3122 days 3%
Katharina Balzer 10/10 3136 days 3%
Marc 5/10 3192 days 2%
Felix Holm 7/10 3555 days 2%
Jean Curry 10/10 3827 days 1%
Jenny Finch 8/10 3845 days 1%
Katja Kraffzik 10/10 3853 days 1%
Rita Hochstiasser 10/10 3874 days 1%
Gale Willcocks 9/10 4207 days 0%
Kathy Arthurs 8/10 4214 days 0%
Ramon Keller 7/10 4294 days 0%
Gillian MacLaren 6/10 4593 days 1%
Tim Clark 8/10 4607 days 1%
Konny 9/10 4686 days 1%
Kari Tervo 6/10 4937 days 1%
Edgar & Marilyn Berry 9/10 4941 days 1%
Hartheib Schmid 9/10 4948 days 1%
Pat MacDonald 9/10 4960 days 1%
David 7/10 4963 days 1%
Melanie Armbruster 6/10 4969 days 1%
Stefanie Halbrock 6/10 4969 days 1%
TheBigLebowski 9/10 5004 days 1%
Tony Masters 9/10 5298 days 1%
Katharina 7/10 5313 days 1%
Tanja Titze 10/10 5331 days 1%
carolineder 8/10 5400 days 1%
Arjan Muis 8/10 5646 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Blue Lake Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.27% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

89%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.