G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cascade Creek Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
183 Valid Reviews
The Cascade Creek Campsite experience has a total of 183 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 183 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 29 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 49 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 54 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 23 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 10 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
79.40% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite valid reviews is 79.40% and is based on 183 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 183 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 7 |
|
18% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
31% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
79.23% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cascade Creek Campsite face-to-face reviews is 79.23% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.63%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 8/10 | 31 days | 99% |
| Clement | 7/10 | 62 days | 94% |
| Mireille & Philippe | 9/10 | 93 days | 100% |
| cirefice bernard | 8/10 | 93 days | 99% |
| Sol | 9/10 | 93 days | 100% |
| Guybert | 7/10 | 123 days | 94% |
| Dom | 7/10 | 123 days | 94% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 123 days | 99% |
| Michaela | 8/10 | 154 days | 98% |
| Rory M | 8/10 | 154 days | 98% |
| Susan Boyton | 10/10 | 307 days | 96% |
| Eline | 8/10 | 337 days | 93% |
| Jacinta | 10/10 | 337 days | 95% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 368 days | 92% |
| McLean | 9/10 | 396 days | 92% |
| VamperCan | 10/10 | 396 days | 92% |
| Fredrik | 7/10 | 427 days | 85% |
| Sarah | 8/10 | 427 days | 89% |
| Debyron | 9/10 | 458 days | 88% |
| Fritz | 9/10 | 488 days | 87% |
| Paul | 10/10 | 488 days | 88% |
| Glenda | 9/10 | 549 days | 83% |
| tasman travels | 10/10 | 641 days | 78% |
| Janneke | 5/10 | 702 days | 56% |
| YP | 7/10 | 702 days | 68% |
| Jesse Leake | 10/10 | 733 days | 70% |
| Alex | 9/10 | 762 days | 67% |
| Lu | 7/10 | 762 days | 63% |
| Jorian | 10/10 | 762 days | 68% |
| Amy | 7/10 | 824 days | 58% |
| Paloma Santos | 3/10 | 824 days | 34% |
| Philippe & Lena | 4/10 | 854 days | 39% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 9/10 | 854 days | 59% |
| Larissa | 6/10 | 854 days | 51% |
| Nina | 9/10 | 854 days | 59% |
| Cholly | 8/10 | 885 days | 55% |
| Hayley Ambrose | 3/10 | 915 days | 29% |
| Marie Perret | 8/10 | 915 days | 52% |
| Henry | 8/10 | 977 days | 46% |
| Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 1038 days | 40% |
| Amy Fortin-Barrette | 10/10 | 1038 days | 41% |
| Christy | 7/10 | 1038 days | 38% |
| Amy Catley | 6/10 | 1038 days | 35% |
| Helen E | 9/10 | 1068 days | 38% |
| Anthony V | 9/10 | 1099 days | 35% |
| Srinivas Prasad Bheemanadam | 9/10 | 1127 days | 33% |
| Lisa | 2/10 | 1127 days | 15% |
| Jaycee | 9/10 | 1158 days | 30% |
| Citlali & Mike | 10/10 | 1158 days | 31% |
| Sophie Rellensmann | 7/10 | 1158 days | 29% |
| Arie | 8/10 | 1158 days | 30% |
| Esther | 8/10 | 1158 days | 30% |
| Amanda Moreira | 7/10 | 1158 days | 29% |
| Romy De Bruin | 6/10 | 1219 days | 23% |
| Rebecca Woodbridge | 7/10 | 1219 days | 24% |
| Felix | 9/10 | 1219 days | 26% |
| Mil | 5/10 | 1219 days | 20% |
| Chantal D | 9/10 | 1311 days | 20% |
| The Gillies | 10/10 | 1829 days | 5% |
| Teesh K | 5/10 | 1949 days | 4% |
| Linda | 6/10 | 2223 days | 4% |
| Tanja & Sven | 8/10 | 2254 days | 4% |
| Katie | 8/10 | 2285 days | 4% |
| GM | 9/10 | 2285 days | 4% |
| Tilly Watermeyer | 9/10 | 2285 days | 4% |
| Timothy Davies | 9/10 | 2315 days | 4% |
| Karl Ohm | 7/10 | 2529 days | 3% |
| Maggie | 6/10 | 2529 days | 3% |
| Elin | 10/10 | 2560 days | 4% |
| Sally Sargeant-Hu | 9/10 | 2560 days | 4% |
| Georgia | 8/10 | 2560 days | 3% |
| Megan Belanger | 9/10 | 2588 days | 3% |
| Freya | 8/10 | 2588 days | 3% |
| Nicki Chow | 6/10 | 2588 days | 3% |
| Franz | 8/10 | 2619 days | 3% |
| Jeremy | 7/10 | 2619 days | 3% |
| Inna | 5/10 | 2619 days | 3% |
| Yh kim | 5/10 | 2619 days | 3% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2619 days | 3% |
| Ruddah | 5/10 | 2619 days | 3% |
| Marilli | 5/10 | 2650 days | 3% |
| Mahi | 9/10 | 2650 days | 3% |
| Cora | 9/10 | 2650 days | 3% |
| Nadine | 8/10 | 2650 days | 3% |
| Mitchell | 9/10 | 2679 days | 3% |
| Angela | 8/10 | 2711 days | 3% |
| Eranda | 10/10 | 2711 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 8/10 | 2711 days | 3% |
| Jonas R. | 8/10 | 2711 days | 3% |
| J wells | 8/10 | 2741 days | 3% |
| Kiri Edwards | 8/10 | 2772 days | 3% |
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 2894 days | 3% |
| Matt | 8/10 | 2894 days | 3% |
| Clobby | 7/10 | 2925 days | 3% |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 2925 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 9/10 | 2925 days | 3% |
| Hanneke van Dijk | 8/10 | 2958 days | 2% |
| Luis Vigil Vidal | 8/10 | 2967 days | 2% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 8/10 | 2974 days | 2% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 2979 days | 3% |
| Anika Bedard | 6/10 | 2979 days | 2% |
| Rasmus Lundgaard Nielsen | 5/10 | 2981 days | 2% |
| Fiona Walker | 9/10 | 2984 days | 3% |
| Brigham Edgar | 9/10 | 2997 days | 3% |
| Gema Frontera | 8/10 | 3026 days | 3% |
| Julian Kihnle | 8/10 | 3043 days | 2% |
| Jenny Jaye | 8/10 | 3079 days | 2% |
| Oz Atiya | 10/10 | 3083 days | 3% |
| Sue Rogers | 10/10 | 3105 days | 2% |
| Poppy Ritchie | 8/10 | 3159 days | 2% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 3233 days | 2% |
| Nathalie Gobin | 8/10 | 3253 days | 2% |
| Wendy Kildey | 10/10 | 3264 days | 2% |
| Shanna de Lang | 7/10 | 3266 days | 2% |
| Connie | 8/10 | 3268 days | 2% |
| Harriet Smith | 9/10 | 3290 days | 2% |
| Trent O'Keeffe | 9/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
| J Dobias | 3/10 | 3371 days | 1% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 3374 days | 2% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 3374 days | 2% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 8/10 | 3383 days | 2% |
| Greg MacFire | 6/10 | 3386 days | 2% |
| Jill Grange | 7/10 | 3403 days | 1% |
| Melanie Giroux | 8/10 | 3454 days | 2% |
| Kathy Hart | 8/10 | 3593 days | 1% |
| Russell Opland | 8/10 | 3603 days | 1% |
| Andrik | 3/10 | 3621 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 10/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
| Heng Sing Teh | 9/10 | 3629 days | 1% |
| Jenny Adams | 7/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
| Sean Stevens | 8/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
| Marina | 10/10 | 3681 days | 1% |
| Rachel Macdonald | 10/10 | 3704 days | 1% |
| Sam Brydon | 8/10 | 3714 days | 1% |
| Lucia | 8/10 | 3714 days | 1% |
| Judith Simpson | 5/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Neil | 8/10 | 3719 days | 1% |
| Jennifer Brown | 9/10 | 3775 days | 1% |
| Yann Le Gac | 7/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 8/10 | 4019 days | 1% |
| Miguel | 7/10 | 4020 days | 1% |
| Wilma Senior | 8/10 | 4048 days | 1% |
| Stefanie Feldman | 9/10 | 4068 days | 1% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 8/10 | 4171 days | 0% |
| Douglas Yeates | 9/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
| Sarah Jane O'Reilly | 1/10 | 4382 days | 0% |
| Tomas Shairi | 1/10 | 4382 days | 0% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 9/10 | 4386 days | 1% |
| Austin Johns | 8/10 | 4388 days | 1% |
| Sarah Christman | 6/10 | 4388 days | 1% |
| Johanna Kofler | 9/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
| Steffen | 8/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
| Manuela Michelbach | 7/10 | 4403 days | 1% |
| Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4409 days | 1% |
| Lionel | 6/10 | 4418 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| Daryl | 10/10 | 4440 days | 1% |
| Cornelia Stark | 9/10 | 4442 days | 1% |
| Michael Stark | 10/10 | 4442 days | 1% |
| Emeline Dupre | 8/10 | 4446 days | 1% |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 9/10 | 4537 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 9/10 | 4537 days | 1% |
| Tim Vennewold | 7/10 | 4738 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 4746 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 10/10 | 4751 days | 1% |
| Jon Barratt | 7/10 | 4847 days | 1% |
| Harald | 9/10 | 5125 days | 1% |
| Paul Fairbrass | 9/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
| Loic | 8/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
| Mike1952 | 9/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
| Nathanael Boehm | 8/10 | 5207 days | 1% |
| Jensen Bresbenbeek | 7/10 | 5208 days | 1% |
| Steve | 8/10 | 5221 days | 1% |
| DJohnson | 9/10 | 5298 days | 1% |
| Becky Edney | 8/10 | 5456 days | 1% |
| Brian Jones | 10/10 | 5461 days | 1% |
| Jacob | 8/10 | 5469 days | 1% |
| T Lipscombe | 4/10 | 5474 days | 0% |
| Betten | 9/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
| Natthien Le Gall | 10/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
| Jann Clar | 9/10 | 5856 days | 1% |
| Yvonne German | 10/10 | 5892 days | 1% |
| Suzie Lechner | 10/10 | 6201 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cascade Creek Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.57% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.