Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Pleasant Flat Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Pleasant Flat Campsite
Valid Reviews
43 Valid Reviews
The Pleasant Flat Campsite experience has a total of 44 reviews. There are 43 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 43 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
19% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
16% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
72.09% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pleasant Flat Campsite valid reviews is 72.09% and is based on 43 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 43 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
33% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pleasant Flat Campsite face-to-face reviews is 74.44% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
71.07%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noelle | 6/10 | 47 days | 87% |
| Aaron | 2/10 | 78 days | 46% |
| Lea | 9/10 | 78 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 261 days | 96% |
| Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 321 days | 93% |
| Rob Heath | 1/10 | 352 days | 38% |
| Carolin | 7/10 | 413 days | 85% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 627 days | 77% |
| Bex | 10/10 | 1600 days | 8% |
| Lauren | 6/10 | 1753 days | 5% |
| Ju | 3/10 | 1782 days | 3% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 1905 days | 4% |
| Charlotte | 8/10 | 2027 days | 4% |
| Renee | 8/10 | 2088 days | 4% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 7/10 | 2119 days | 4% |
| Karo | 7/10 | 2239 days | 4% |
| Juliane | 8/10 | 2453 days | 4% |
| Marco Albrecht | 9/10 | 2551 days | 3% |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 2609 days | 3% |
| Nathan Lal | 9/10 | 2716 days | 3% |
| Narayan Mahadevan | 7/10 | 2809 days | 2% |
| Aidan Byrne | 8/10 | 3017 days | 3% |
| Jessica Stokes | 8/10 | 3083 days | 2% |
| Emma | 3/10 | 3138 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3185 days | 2% |
| Juan Viscegle | 8/10 | 3207 days | 2% |
| Gilles Andrieu | 8/10 | 3224 days | 2% |
| Marie Boissonneault | 5/10 | 3235 days | 2% |
| Amy Bayliss | 8/10 | 3268 days | 2% |
| Bob Fontaine | 9/10 | 3383 days | 2% |
| Rachel S | 6/10 | 3549 days | 1% |
| Alistair Millward | 10/10 | 3576 days | 2% |
| Alexandre Moleiro | 7/10 | 3670 days | 1% |
| Robert Webber | 10/10 | 3700 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 3994 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 6/10 | 4285 days | 0% |
| Stientje van den Heuvel | 6/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
| Colin and Raewyn Newton | 6/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
| Jenben | 6/10 | 4430 days | 1% |
| jhwjhw | 7/10 | 4980 days | 1% |
| Therea | 8/10 | 5009 days | 1% |
| Lieve Verdonck | 8/10 | 5042 days | 1% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 5062 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Pleasant Flat Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
6.42% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.