Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Pleasant Flat Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Pleasant Flat Campsite
Valid Reviews
44 Valid Reviews
The Pleasant Flat Campsite experience has a total of 45 reviews. There are 44 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
18% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
16% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
71.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pleasant Flat Campsite valid reviews is 71.59% and is based on 44 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 44 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
33% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pleasant Flat Campsite face-to-face reviews is 74.44% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
68.12%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucy | 5/10 | 257 days | 83% |
| Noelle | 6/10 | 408 days | 88% |
| Aaron | 2/10 | 439 days | 46% |
| Lea | 9/10 | 439 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 622 days | 88% |
| Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 682 days | 82% |
| Rob Heath | 1/10 | 713 days | 33% |
| Carolin | 7/10 | 774 days | 70% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 988 days | 50% |
| Bex | 10/10 | 1961 days | 5% |
| Lauren | 6/10 | 2114 days | 4% |
| Ju | 3/10 | 2143 days | 3% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 2266 days | 4% |
| Charlotte | 8/10 | 2388 days | 4% |
| Renee | 8/10 | 2449 days | 4% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 7/10 | 2480 days | 4% |
| Karo | 7/10 | 2600 days | 4% |
| Juliane | 8/10 | 2814 days | 3% |
| Marco Albrecht | 9/10 | 2912 days | 3% |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 2970 days | 3% |
| Nathan Lal | 9/10 | 3077 days | 3% |
| Narayan Mahadevan | 7/10 | 3170 days | 2% |
| Aidan Byrne | 8/10 | 3378 days | 2% |
| Jessica Stokes | 8/10 | 3444 days | 2% |
| Emma | 3/10 | 3499 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3546 days | 2% |
| Juan Viscegle | 8/10 | 3568 days | 1% |
| Gilles Andrieu | 8/10 | 3585 days | 2% |
| Marie Boissonneault | 5/10 | 3596 days | 1% |
| Amy Bayliss | 8/10 | 3629 days | 2% |
| Bob Fontaine | 9/10 | 3744 days | 1% |
| Rachel S | 6/10 | 3909 days | 1% |
| Alistair Millward | 10/10 | 3937 days | 1% |
| Alexandre Moleiro | 7/10 | 4030 days | 1% |
| Robert Webber | 10/10 | 4060 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 4355 days | 0% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 6/10 | 4646 days | 1% |
| Stientje van den Heuvel | 6/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
| Colin and Raewyn Newton | 6/10 | 4685 days | 1% |
| Jenben | 6/10 | 4791 days | 1% |
| John Wekking | 7/10 | 5341 days | 1% |
| Therea | 8/10 | 5370 days | 1% |
| Lieve Verdonck | 8/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 5423 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Pleasant Flat Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
8.11% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
76%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.