G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Pleasant Flat Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Pleasant Flat Campsite
Valid Reviews
43 Valid Reviews
The Pleasant Flat Campsite experience has a total of 44 reviews. There are 43 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 43 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 12 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
19% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
16% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
72.09% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pleasant Flat Campsite valid reviews is 72.09% and is based on 43 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 43 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 2 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 3 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
33% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
74.44% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Pleasant Flat Campsite face-to-face reviews is 74.44% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
71.11%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noelle | 6/10 | 21 days | 87% |
| Aaron | 2/10 | 52 days | 46% |
| Lea | 9/10 | 52 days | 100% |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 235 days | 97% |
| Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 295 days | 94% |
| Rob Heath | 1/10 | 326 days | 38% |
| Carolin | 7/10 | 387 days | 86% |
| Liz | 8/10 | 601 days | 79% |
| Bex | 10/10 | 1574 days | 9% |
| Lauren | 6/10 | 1727 days | 5% |
| Ju | 3/10 | 1756 days | 3% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 1879 days | 4% |
| Charlotte | 8/10 | 2001 days | 4% |
| Renee | 8/10 | 2062 days | 4% |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 7/10 | 2093 days | 4% |
| Karo | 7/10 | 2213 days | 4% |
| Juliane | 8/10 | 2427 days | 4% |
| Marco Albrecht | 9/10 | 2525 days | 4% |
| Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 2583 days | 3% |
| Nathan Lal | 9/10 | 2690 days | 3% |
| Narayan Mahadevan | 7/10 | 2783 days | 2% |
| Aidan Byrne | 8/10 | 2991 days | 3% |
| Jessica Stokes | 8/10 | 3057 days | 2% |
| Emma | 3/10 | 3112 days | 1% |
| Chadd Holland | 7/10 | 3159 days | 2% |
| Juan Viscegle | 8/10 | 3181 days | 2% |
| Gilles Andrieu | 8/10 | 3198 days | 2% |
| Marie Boissonneault | 5/10 | 3209 days | 2% |
| Amy Bayliss | 8/10 | 3242 days | 2% |
| Bob Fontaine | 9/10 | 3357 days | 2% |
| Rachel S | 6/10 | 3522 days | 1% |
| Alistair Millward | 10/10 | 3550 days | 2% |
| Alexandre Moleiro | 7/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
| Robert Webber | 10/10 | 3673 days | 1% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 9/10 | 3968 days | 1% |
| Clarissa Hanck | 6/10 | 4259 days | 0% |
| Stientje van den Heuvel | 6/10 | 4270 days | 0% |
| Colin and Raewyn Newton | 6/10 | 4298 days | 0% |
| Jenben | 6/10 | 4404 days | 1% |
| jhwjhw | 7/10 | 4954 days | 1% |
| Therea | 8/10 | 4983 days | 1% |
| Lieve Verdonck | 8/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
| Bas Geerts | 9/10 | 5036 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Pleasant Flat Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
6.40% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.