Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite

Valid Reviews

103 Valid Reviews

The Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite experience has a total of 107 reviews. There are 103 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 103 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 45
44%
9/10 36
35%
8/10 13
13%
7/10 5
5%
6/10 2
2%
5/10 2
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

90.78% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite valid reviews is 90.78% and is based on 103 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

23 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 103 valid reviews, the experience has 23 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 23 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 6
26%
9/10 9
39%
8/10 7
30%
7/10 1
4%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

88.70% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.70% and is based on 23 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

88.06%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Sophie 9/10 45 days 99%
Laura 7/10 45 days 93%
Magda Musa 10/10 45 days 100%
McLean 9/10 45 days 99%
Emily 9/10 76 days 99%
Jakub 5/10 137 days 76%
Khalid 9/10 351 days 92%
Jesse Leake 10/10 351 days 93%
Janet and Kevin 10/10 380 days 92%
Andi 9/10 380 days 91%
Daggi 9/10 472 days 87%
Niff 6/10 686 days 63%
Manuel Mayer 10/10 745 days 68%
J King 6/10 776 days 57%
Marion 9/10 776 days 65%
Nyree 10/10 776 days 66%
Mckenzie Galbraith 8/10 807 days 62%
Julia 10/10 807 days 63%
Yuri Fey 10/10 868 days 57%
RaghaV 8/10 1141 days 31%
EvaBelle 7/10 1172 days 27%
Siobhan 10/10 1475 days 12%
Maree 10/10 1475 days 12%
The Gillies 10/10 1475 days 12%
Ange 10/10 1506 days 11%
Ambili 9/10 1506 days 11%
Paula 8/10 1567 days 9%
Boardwalk Blss 9/10 1659 days 7%
Anneke 9/10 1812 days 5%
Jean-Michel and Bambi 10/10 1812 days 5%
Thangs 10/10 1812 days 5%
Leona 9/10 1872 days 5%
GM 9/10 1903 days 5%
Fred 10/10 1933 days 5%
Suthep 10/10 2147 days 4%
Cathy Casanova 10/10 2178 days 4%
Jonathan 10/10 2206 days 4%
Anne 9/10 2206 days 4%
Sam 7/10 2237 days 4%
Lauren 9/10 2237 days 4%
Paula G 9/10 2268 days 4%
Thijs 10/10 2268 days 4%
Raphaele 10/10 2268 days 4%
Maka 10/10 2268 days 4%
Connor 10/10 2268 days 4%
Rachael Dyson 9/10 2297 days 4%
Demi Thompson 8/10 2298 days 4%
Cindy 9/10 2298 days 4%
Eva 10/10 2359 days 4%
James 10/10 2512 days 4%
Arne 9/10 2512 days 4%
Mallory 10/10 2543 days 4%
Tristan & Jolie 10/10 2543 days 4%
Sophie Avison 9/10 2558 days 4%
Clare Davies 10/10 2601 days 3%
Derek Gillard 9/10 2601 days 3%
Geart-Jan Benedictus 8/10 2621 days 3%
Lucile Gendre 9/10 2862 days 3%
Lucy Oury 9/10 2864 days 3%
Nick Lawson 9/10 2867 days 3%
Brandon 10/10 2897 days 3%
Paul Williams 10/10 2930 days 3%
Linda Livett 5/10 2935 days 2%
Craig Eagleton 10/10 2941 days 3%
Trent O'Keeffe 10/10 2957 days 3%
Joe Hopkins 10/10 2965 days 3%
Ruiyi Yin 10/10 3004 days 3%
Jude Ong 10/10 3027 days 3%
Arthur 9/10 3219 days 2%
Lena Wesselink 9/10 3276 days 2%
Tony Maroulis 10/10 3283 days 2%
Felicity Fay 9/10 3301 days 2%
Lisa Conradie 8/10 3302 days 2%
Jonas Jutzi 10/10 3413 days 2%
Petra Geblova 10/10 3686 days 1%
Janie Allen 10/10 3691 days 1%
Henrik Bours 8/10 3988 days 1%
Svenja Trubenbach 9/10 3988 days 1%
Kathrin Deichmann 10/10 4009 days 1%
Janis Gallois 10/10 4027 days 1%
Kiernan Matthew 9/10 4031 days 1%
Zoe Ross 9/10 4032 days 1%
Andrew Young 10/10 4032 days 1%
Danyelle Miller 9/10 4055 days 1%
Thomas Roche 10/10 4065 days 0%
Mycall 10/10 4338 days 0%
ramy 9/10 4338 days 0%
Annika Schmidt 7/10 4343 days 0%
Michael Heuer 9/10 4346 days 0%
Steve Maona 9/10 4362 days 0%
Billy Koichopolos 8/10 4362 days 0%
Gina Lisi 8/10 4362 days 0%
Petra Blumberg 8/10 4375 days 0%
Clare Cannon 9/10 4379 days 0%
Jan Zimmerman 8/10 4384 days 1%
Kerri 7/10 4428 days 1%
Val Phillips 8/10 4727 days 1%
Hazel & Alan Damerell 10/10 4745 days 1%
Kasten 10/10 5102 days 1%
Kasia Robshaw 9/10 5104 days 1%
Andy 8/10 5115 days 1%
Dr Dorthe Bossow 10/10 5124 days 1%
Ruud Kapteyn 9/10 5499 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.28% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

89%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.