Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
103 Valid Reviews
The Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite experience has a total of 107 reviews. There are 103 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 103 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 45 |
|
44% |
9/10 | 36 |
|
35% |
8/10 | 13 |
|
13% |
7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.78% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite valid reviews is 90.78% and is based on 103 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
23 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 103 valid reviews, the experience has 23 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 23 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
26% |
9/10 | 9 |
|
39% |
8/10 | 7 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.70% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite face-to-face reviews is 88.70% and is based on 23 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.06%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Sophie | 9/10 | 45 days | 99% |
Laura | 7/10 | 45 days | 93% |
Magda Musa | 10/10 | 45 days | 100% |
McLean | 9/10 | 45 days | 99% |
Emily | 9/10 | 76 days | 99% |
Jakub | 5/10 | 137 days | 76% |
Khalid | 9/10 | 351 days | 92% |
Jesse Leake | 10/10 | 351 days | 93% |
Janet and Kevin | 10/10 | 380 days | 92% |
Andi | 9/10 | 380 days | 91% |
Daggi | 9/10 | 472 days | 87% |
Niff | 6/10 | 686 days | 63% |
Manuel Mayer | 10/10 | 745 days | 68% |
J King | 6/10 | 776 days | 57% |
Marion | 9/10 | 776 days | 65% |
Nyree | 10/10 | 776 days | 66% |
Mckenzie Galbraith | 8/10 | 807 days | 62% |
Julia | 10/10 | 807 days | 63% |
Yuri Fey | 10/10 | 868 days | 57% |
RaghaV | 8/10 | 1141 days | 31% |
EvaBelle | 7/10 | 1172 days | 27% |
Siobhan | 10/10 | 1475 days | 12% |
Maree | 10/10 | 1475 days | 12% |
The Gillies | 10/10 | 1475 days | 12% |
Ange | 10/10 | 1506 days | 11% |
Ambili | 9/10 | 1506 days | 11% |
Paula | 8/10 | 1567 days | 9% |
Boardwalk Blss | 9/10 | 1659 days | 7% |
Anneke | 9/10 | 1812 days | 5% |
Jean-Michel and Bambi | 10/10 | 1812 days | 5% |
Thangs | 10/10 | 1812 days | 5% |
Leona | 9/10 | 1872 days | 5% |
GM | 9/10 | 1903 days | 5% |
Fred | 10/10 | 1933 days | 5% |
Suthep | 10/10 | 2147 days | 4% |
Cathy Casanova | 10/10 | 2178 days | 4% |
Jonathan | 10/10 | 2206 days | 4% |
Anne | 9/10 | 2206 days | 4% |
Sam | 7/10 | 2237 days | 4% |
Lauren | 9/10 | 2237 days | 4% |
Paula G | 9/10 | 2268 days | 4% |
Thijs | 10/10 | 2268 days | 4% |
Raphaele | 10/10 | 2268 days | 4% |
Maka | 10/10 | 2268 days | 4% |
Connor | 10/10 | 2268 days | 4% |
Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 2297 days | 4% |
Demi Thompson | 8/10 | 2298 days | 4% |
Cindy | 9/10 | 2298 days | 4% |
Eva | 10/10 | 2359 days | 4% |
James | 10/10 | 2512 days | 4% |
Arne | 9/10 | 2512 days | 4% |
Mallory | 10/10 | 2543 days | 4% |
Tristan & Jolie | 10/10 | 2543 days | 4% |
Sophie Avison | 9/10 | 2558 days | 4% |
Clare Davies | 10/10 | 2601 days | 3% |
Derek Gillard | 9/10 | 2601 days | 3% |
Geart-Jan Benedictus | 8/10 | 2621 days | 3% |
Lucile Gendre | 9/10 | 2862 days | 3% |
Lucy Oury | 9/10 | 2864 days | 3% |
Nick Lawson | 9/10 | 2867 days | 3% |
Brandon | 10/10 | 2897 days | 3% |
Paul Williams | 10/10 | 2930 days | 3% |
Linda Livett | 5/10 | 2935 days | 2% |
Craig Eagleton | 10/10 | 2941 days | 3% |
Trent O'Keeffe | 10/10 | 2957 days | 3% |
Joe Hopkins | 10/10 | 2965 days | 3% |
Ruiyi Yin | 10/10 | 3004 days | 3% |
Jude Ong | 10/10 | 3027 days | 3% |
Arthur | 9/10 | 3219 days | 2% |
Lena Wesselink | 9/10 | 3276 days | 2% |
Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3283 days | 2% |
Felicity Fay | 9/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
Lisa Conradie | 8/10 | 3302 days | 2% |
Jonas Jutzi | 10/10 | 3413 days | 2% |
Petra Geblova | 10/10 | 3686 days | 1% |
Janie Allen | 10/10 | 3691 days | 1% |
Henrik Bours | 8/10 | 3988 days | 1% |
Svenja Trubenbach | 9/10 | 3988 days | 1% |
Kathrin Deichmann | 10/10 | 4009 days | 1% |
Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4027 days | 1% |
Kiernan Matthew | 9/10 | 4031 days | 1% |
Zoe Ross | 9/10 | 4032 days | 1% |
Andrew Young | 10/10 | 4032 days | 1% |
Danyelle Miller | 9/10 | 4055 days | 1% |
Thomas Roche | 10/10 | 4065 days | 0% |
Mycall | 10/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
ramy | 9/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
Annika Schmidt | 7/10 | 4343 days | 0% |
Michael Heuer | 9/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
Steve Maona | 9/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
Billy Koichopolos | 8/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
Gina Lisi | 8/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
Petra Blumberg | 8/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
Clare Cannon | 9/10 | 4379 days | 0% |
Jan Zimmerman | 8/10 | 4384 days | 1% |
Kerri | 7/10 | 4428 days | 1% |
Val Phillips | 8/10 | 4727 days | 1% |
Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 4745 days | 1% |
Kasten | 10/10 | 5102 days | 1% |
Kasia Robshaw | 9/10 | 5104 days | 1% |
Andy | 8/10 | 5115 days | 1% |
Dr Dorthe Bossow | 10/10 | 5124 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 9/10 | 5499 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Kidds Bush Reserve Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.28% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.