Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cameron Flat Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
51 Valid Reviews
The Cameron Flat Campsite experience has a total of 54 reviews. There are 51 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 51 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 11 |
|
22% |
8/10 | 16 |
|
31% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
12% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
78.24% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cameron Flat Campsite valid reviews is 78.24% and is based on 51 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
8 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 51 valid reviews, the experience has 8 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 8 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 1 |
|
13% |
9/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
8/10 | 1 |
|
13% |
7/10 | 2 |
|
25% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
25% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
13% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 1 |
|
13% |
62.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cameron Flat Campsite face-to-face reviews is 62.50% and is based on 8 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
80.52%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Lea | 9/10 | 49 days | 100% |
Dylan | 3/10 | 202 days | 54% |
Rebecca | 8/10 | 232 days | 96% |
Joel Fryett | 8/10 | 323 days | 93% |
Niff | 9/10 | 598 days | 80% |
Sarah Elliott | 10/10 | 688 days | 74% |
ElizabethE | 8/10 | 688 days | 72% |
Bradley | 8/10 | 688 days | 72% |
Lucy | 7/10 | 841 days | 56% |
The Gillies | 9/10 | 1387 days | 16% |
Ying | 9/10 | 1510 days | 11% |
Just a guy | 8/10 | 1724 days | 6% |
Emma | 7/10 | 1753 days | 5% |
GiuliaG | 7/10 | 1815 days | 5% |
Julianne McKie | 9/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
Michael S | 5/10 | 2118 days | 3% |
Dave Reynolds | 6/10 | 2149 days | 4% |
Matt Tebbit | 10/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
vally | 8/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
Safire B | 6/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
Indy | 8/10 | 2210 days | 4% |
Melinda Pyke | 8/10 | 2271 days | 4% |
Louis | 8/10 | 2333 days | 4% |
Sezz bella | 9/10 | 2394 days | 4% |
Raylene Harvey | 10/10 | 2394 days | 4% |
Matthew Hall | 10/10 | 2509 days | 4% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2545 days | 4% |
Debbie Lesurf | 9/10 | 2545 days | 4% |
Cat Pinder | 9/10 | 2573 days | 4% |
Joe Trigg | 7/10 | 2586 days | 3% |
Esmee Winnubst | 9/10 | 2763 days | 3% |
Marc Lambert | 8/10 | 2795 days | 3% |
Katie Marx | 8/10 | 2820 days | 3% |
Angie Abbink | 9/10 | 3028 days | 3% |
Rita Ashby | 8/10 | 3093 days | 2% |
Rebecca Symons | 10/10 | 3246 days | 2% |
Udo Wagner | 2/10 | 3262 days | 1% |
Erica b | 8/10 | 3520 days | 2% |
Liliana Zahut | 10/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 10/10 | 3794 days | 1% |
Tom Guthknecht | 10/10 | 3879 days | 1% |
Karen Perry | 10/10 | 4097 days | 1% |
Deon Bossenger | 8/10 | 4250 days | 0% |
Marcel | 7/10 | 4274 days | 0% |
Maria | 6/10 | 4274 days | 0% |
Rob Cadmus | 8/10 | 4284 days | 0% |
Kate Glover | 6/10 | 4284 days | 0% |
Chew (Peter) | 7/10 | 4362 days | 0% |
Ofir Avimeir | 1/10 | 4990 days | 0% |
Rissa W | 8/10 | 5040 days | 1% |
linus | 5/10 | 5593 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cameron Flat Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
2.86% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.