Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Boundary Creek Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Boundary Creek Campsite
Valid Reviews
83 Valid Reviews
The Boundary Creek Campsite experience has a total of 85 reviews. There are 83 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 83 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 20 |
|
24% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
20% |
| 8/10 | 25 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
82.29% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Boundary Creek Campsite valid reviews is 82.29% and is based on 83 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
24 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 83 valid reviews, the experience has 24 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 24 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
21% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
8% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.50% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Boundary Creek Campsite face-to-face reviews is 82.50% and is based on 24 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
72.24%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Newman | 1/10 | 144 days | 100% |
| Cait Turner | 10/10 | 1513 days | 26% |
| Drew | 10/10 | 1879 days | 12% |
| Sabine | 8/10 | 1879 days | 12% |
| Timothy Davies | 7/10 | 1940 days | 11% |
| A&E | 8/10 | 1971 days | 12% |
| ScoutnIndi | 10/10 | 2093 days | 11% |
| Fabian | 10/10 | 2244 days | 10% |
| Joe | 8/10 | 2244 days | 10% |
| Franz | 9/10 | 2244 days | 10% |
| From DK | 9/10 | 2244 days | 10% |
| Heather Abbott | 8/10 | 2244 days | 10% |
| Anwang | 10/10 | 2275 days | 10% |
| Graham Anna | 10/10 | 2275 days | 10% |
| Dave Reynolds | 9/10 | 2275 days | 10% |
| Joanne | 10/10 | 2305 days | 10% |
| Eranda | 10/10 | 2336 days | 10% |
| Christina | 6/10 | 2519 days | 8% |
| Juliane | 9/10 | 2519 days | 9% |
| MJW | 8/10 | 2550 days | 9% |
| Qi Moss | 8/10 | 2550 days | 9% |
| Jill McGrath | 6/10 | 2573 days | 6% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 7/10 | 2576 days | 6% |
| Niall McGrath | 7/10 | 2580 days | 8% |
| Fei Fei Lei | 7/10 | 2599 days | 6% |
| Oceane Imber | 10/10 | 2604 days | 9% |
| Stefan Hohmann | 10/10 | 2650 days | 8% |
| Jarod | 8/10 | 2669 days | 8% |
| Michael Talbot | 8/10 | 2675 days | 8% |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2730 days | 8% |
| Bruce Graham | 9/10 | 2858 days | 7% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 2863 days | 7% |
| deborah cooper | 7/10 | 2914 days | 7% |
| Andy Kubic | 6/10 | 2921 days | 6% |
| Adrian Soldati | 6/10 | 2969 days | 6% |
| Joe Hopkins | 8/10 | 2972 days | 7% |
| Nicola Barlow | 6/10 | 3000 days | 6% |
| Franziska Liebe | 10/10 | 3004 days | 5% |
| Sujanyag | 10/10 | 3039 days | 7% |
| Kim Donze | 8/10 | 3108 days | 6% |
| Susan Boyton | 8/10 | 3257 days | 5% |
| Sam Smith-Palomeque | 8/10 | 3266 days | 5% |
| Juan Viscegle | 6/10 | 3273 days | 4% |
| Goldfinger | 9/10 | 3279 days | 5% |
| Gabor Kabacs | 7/10 | 3291 days | 5% |
| Bill McMurray | 10/10 | 3291 days | 5% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 5/10 | 3300 days | 4% |
| R Werder | 8/10 | 3324 days | 5% |
| Jakob Kofoed | 10/10 | 3329 days | 5% |
| Sandy Stamp | 8/10 | 3342 days | 5% |
| Ellen Schmitz | 9/10 | 3351 days | 5% |
| Steve Warren | 8/10 | 3462 days | 4% |
| Miguel | 8/10 | 3645 days | 3% |
| Bert Gielen | 9/10 | 3677 days | 3% |
| Petra Geblova | 7/10 | 3693 days | 3% |
| Elles Janssen | 7/10 | 3704 days | 3% |
| Clare Lambley | 8/10 | 3721 days | 2% |
| bzh974 | 6/10 | 3735 days | 3% |
| Justin globalgauthiers.blogspot.com | 8/10 | 3980 days | 2% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 7/10 | 3983 days | 1% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 10/10 | 4022 days | 1% |
| Lena Wacker | 9/10 | 4022 days | 1% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4062 days | 1% |
| Team Kim&James | 8/10 | 4223 days | 1% |
| Rainer | 8/10 | 4351 days | 0% |
| Jiri van Straelper | 5/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Kadyan | 8/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Enna Keet | 8/10 | 4388 days | 2% |
| Nils Poppenborg | 10/10 | 4389 days | 2% |
| Philip Gibbons | 9/10 | 4404 days | 2% |
| Andreas & Leonie Fehr | 10/10 | 4762 days | 2% |
| Tom Connis | 9/10 | 4769 days | 2% |
| Mirando4ka | 9/10 | 4770 days | 2% |
| Graeme | 7/10 | 4801 days | 2% |
| jule | 9/10 | 4862 days | 2% |
| Bill Mclennan | 10/10 | 5089 days | 2% |
| Coral Last | 8/10 | 5093 days | 2% |
| Ian and Ailsa | 7/10 | 5094 days | 2% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 5128 days | 2% |
| Annette Schmitt | 9/10 | 5494 days | 2% |
| Mike | 10/10 | 5546 days | 2% |
| Becca1 | 9/10 | 5808 days | 2% |
| winter_uk | 8/10 | 5849 days | 2% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Boundary Creek Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
5.84% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.