Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Twelve Mile Delta Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
129 Valid Reviews
The Twelve Mile Delta Campsite experience has a total of 132 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 25 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 30 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 24 |
|
19% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 9 |
|
7% |
| 4/10 | 5 |
|
4% |
| 3/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
75.35% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Twelve Mile Delta Campsite valid reviews is 75.35% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
37 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 37 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.24% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Twelve Mile Delta Campsite face-to-face reviews is 83.24% and is based on 37 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
68.34%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terezka | 4/10 | 5 days | 66% |
| Jakub | 8/10 | 66 days | 98% |
| Andy | 10/10 | 96 days | 100% |
| Laurie | 8/10 | 188 days | 97% |
| Nico | 3/10 | 249 days | 53% |
| Jenny | 7/10 | 280 days | 89% |
| Harry | 5/10 | 308 days | 72% |
| Sarah | 5/10 | 339 days | 72% |
| Aaron | 7/10 | 431 days | 84% |
| L Ward | 4/10 | 431 days | 59% |
| Laura | 4/10 | 461 days | 58% |
| Erin | 10/10 | 523 days | 85% |
| Aileen Corbett | 2/10 | 614 days | 36% |
| Heloise | 1/10 | 674 days | 30% |
| Sarah Mitchell | 7/10 | 705 days | 67% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 8/10 | 766 days | 66% |
| Mike Weir | 9/10 | 797 days | 63% |
| Pablo | 2/10 | 858 days | 27% |
| Ayrton boot | 1/10 | 889 days | 22% |
| Molly M | 10/10 | 889 days | 55% |
| Jericho | 1/10 | 980 days | 19% |
| Niff | 10/10 | 980 days | 46% |
| Josh | 10/10 | 980 days | 46% |
| Meg | 5/10 | 1131 days | 25% |
| Arnon Meshoulam | 8/10 | 1131 days | 32% |
| Seth | 9/10 | 1619 days | 7% |
| Stace | 4/10 | 1741 days | 4% |
| Michelle | 7/10 | 1800 days | 5% |
| HSnow | 7/10 | 1922 days | 4% |
| Klaudia | 10/10 | 2106 days | 4% |
| Chieco Family | 9/10 | 2258 days | 4% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 2258 days | 4% |
| Taylor | 7/10 | 2441 days | 4% |
| Megan Belanger | 10/10 | 2500 days | 4% |
| Helena Wong | 8/10 | 2500 days | 4% |
| M Elsten | 6/10 | 2531 days | 3% |
| Inna | 5/10 | 2531 days | 3% |
| Ruddah | 6/10 | 2531 days | 3% |
| JT | 6/10 | 2531 days | 3% |
| Raphaele | 8/10 | 2562 days | 3% |
| Maycamper | 8/10 | 2562 days | 3% |
| Henk Sjon | 9/10 | 2562 days | 4% |
| Indy | 7/10 | 2592 days | 3% |
| Raylene Harvey | 8/10 | 2776 days | 3% |
| Tish Arellano Munro | 10/10 | 2806 days | 3% |
| Laura Clay | 9/10 | 2837 days | 3% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 7/10 | 2863 days | 2% |
| Jos Mulder | 9/10 | 2868 days | 3% |
| Rasmus Lundgaard Nielsen | 10/10 | 2893 days | 3% |
| Katrina | 7/10 | 2895 days | 3% |
| Marco Albrecht | 8/10 | 2905 days | 3% |
| Annina Jarvinen | 8/10 | 2915 days | 2% |
| Jenny Jaye | 10/10 | 2991 days | 3% |
| Runa Lindblom | 10/10 | 2999 days | 3% |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 8/10 | 3008 days | 3% |
| Nathan Lal | 8/10 | 3069 days | 2% |
| Lucile Gendre | 7/10 | 3156 days | 2% |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 5/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| Rogina de Jong | 8/10 | 3251 days | 2% |
| Roeland Driessen | 6/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
| Verena Fendt | 10/10 | 3265 days | 2% |
| Lavkesh Patel | 10/10 | 3277 days | 2% |
| Madi | 7/10 | 3286 days | 2% |
| Alvin soh | 9/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Michelle Klein | 8/10 | 3382 days | 2% |
| Kim Donze | 8/10 | 3395 days | 2% |
| Beth Goodrich | 7/10 | 3426 days | 2% |
| Rita Ashby | 8/10 | 3474 days | 2% |
| E Janssen | 10/10 | 3479 days | 2% |
| Fija V | 7/10 | 3520 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 7/10 | 3523 days | 2% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 3526 days | 2% |
| Katrina Thomas | 7/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 4/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
| Jacqui Deans | 8/10 | 3626 days | 1% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 2/10 | 3687 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Poppe | 7/10 | 3907 days | 1% |
| Adam Wight | 7/10 | 3935 days | 1% |
| Katie Scholl | 9/10 | 3937 days | 1% |
| Averil Brown | 7/10 | 3958 days | 1% |
| Evelyn | 7/10 | 3960 days | 1% |
| Bert Gielen | 8/10 | 3964 days | 1% |
| M Pruden | 8/10 | 3989 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 3/10 | 4113 days | 0% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 8/10 | 4176 days | 0% |
| mcp hm | 5/10 | 4267 days | 0% |
| Karolina Gren | 5/10 | 4267 days | 0% |
| Mark | 8/10 | 4280 days | 0% |
| Tomas Shairi | 8/10 | 4294 days | 0% |
| Mara | 10/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Andrea Morello | 10/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
| Sophie Wolters | 10/10 | 4306 days | 0% |
| Matt Hyland | 9/10 | 4307 days | 0% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 9/10 | 4309 days | 0% |
| Lena Wacker | 9/10 | 4309 days | 0% |
| Karel | 9/10 | 4314 days | 0% |
| Anna Guzewiez | 9/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Simon Tanguy | 9/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
| Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4321 days | 0% |
| David Krasner | 9/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 9/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4330 days | 0% |
| Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 4333 days | 0% |
| Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 4333 days | 0% |
| Philipp | 9/10 | 4338 days | 0% |
| Mayan Goddat | 10/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| Daniel Naveh | 8/10 | 4346 days | 0% |
| Jessica Quirk | 10/10 | 4356 days | 0% |
| Thomas Roche | 5/10 | 4359 days | 0% |
| Pokari | 9/10 | 4449 days | 1% |
| s_smith | 10/10 | 4602 days | 1% |
| Socea | 7/10 | 4647 days | 1% |
| Lea Scheuvens | 8/10 | 4653 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 9/10 | 4658 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 9/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
| Andrea Lang | 7/10 | 4669 days | 1% |
| CanadaGirl23 | 8/10 | 4722 days | 1% |
| Puma17 | 7/10 | 4722 days | 1% |
| Leticia Martin | 10/10 | 4744 days | 1% |
| suzan107 | 10/10 | 4967 days | 1% |
| Keith Helen | 10/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
| OldSchool | 5/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
| Schury | 10/10 | 5365 days | 1% |
| Rissa W | 8/10 | 5422 days | 1% |
| koster | 8/10 | 5693 days | 1% |
| csziegler | 3/10 | 5833 days | 0% |
| Simon Slawner | 9/10 | 5851 days | 1% |
| davidne | 9/10 | 6093 days | 1% |
| Zdenek | 9/10 | 6137 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Twelve Mile Delta Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
7.98% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
77%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.