Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Twelve Mile Delta Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Twelve Mile Delta Campsite
Valid Reviews
124 Valid Reviews
The Twelve Mile Delta Campsite experience has a total of 127 reviews. There are 124 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 124 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 24 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 23 |
|
19% |
| 8/10 | 28 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 24 |
|
19% |
| 6/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 9 |
|
7% |
| 4/10 | 4 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 1/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
75.73% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Twelve Mile Delta Campsite valid reviews is 75.73% and is based on 124 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
37 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 124 valid reviews, the experience has 37 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 37 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
22% |
| 9/10 | 12 |
|
32% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
24% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.24% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Twelve Mile Delta Campsite face-to-face reviews is 83.24% and is based on 37 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
67.93%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jenny | 7/10 | 29 days | 97% |
| Harry | 5/10 | 57 days | 79% |
| Sarah | 5/10 | 88 days | 79% |
| Aaron | 7/10 | 180 days | 95% |
| L Ward | 4/10 | 180 days | 67% |
| Laura | 4/10 | 210 days | 66% |
| Erin | 10/10 | 272 days | 100% |
| Aileen Corbett | 2/10 | 363 days | 44% |
| Heloise | 1/10 | 423 days | 38% |
| Sarah Mitchell | 7/10 | 454 days | 86% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 8/10 | 515 days | 87% |
| Mike Weir | 9/10 | 546 days | 86% |
| Pablo | 2/10 | 607 days | 38% |
| Ayrton boot | 1/10 | 638 days | 33% |
| Molly M | 10/10 | 638 days | 80% |
| Jericho | 1/10 | 729 days | 29% |
| Niff | 10/10 | 729 days | 73% |
| Josh | 10/10 | 729 days | 73% |
| Meg | 5/10 | 880 days | 44% |
| Arnon Meshoulam | 8/10 | 880 days | 57% |
| Seth | 9/10 | 1368 days | 17% |
| Stace | 4/10 | 1490 days | 8% |
| Michelle | 7/10 | 1549 days | 9% |
| HSnow | 7/10 | 1671 days | 6% |
| Klaudia | 10/10 | 1855 days | 5% |
| Chieco Family | 9/10 | 2007 days | 5% |
| Libby | 7/10 | 2007 days | 4% |
| Taylor | 7/10 | 2190 days | 4% |
| Megan Belanger | 10/10 | 2249 days | 4% |
| Helena Wong | 8/10 | 2249 days | 4% |
| M Elsten | 6/10 | 2280 days | 4% |
| Inna | 5/10 | 2280 days | 3% |
| Ruddah | 6/10 | 2280 days | 4% |
| JT | 6/10 | 2280 days | 4% |
| Raphaele | 8/10 | 2311 days | 4% |
| Maycamper | 8/10 | 2311 days | 4% |
| Henk Sjon | 9/10 | 2311 days | 4% |
| Indy | 7/10 | 2341 days | 4% |
| Raylene Harvey | 8/10 | 2525 days | 4% |
| Tish Arellano Munro | 10/10 | 2555 days | 4% |
| Laura Clay | 9/10 | 2586 days | 4% |
| Louis Goring-Morris | 7/10 | 2612 days | 3% |
| Jos Mulder | 9/10 | 2617 days | 4% |
| Rasmus Lundgaard Nielsen | 10/10 | 2642 days | 3% |
| Katrina | 7/10 | 2644 days | 3% |
| Marco Albrecht | 8/10 | 2654 days | 3% |
| Annina Jarvinen | 8/10 | 2664 days | 3% |
| Jenny Jaye | 10/10 | 2740 days | 3% |
| Runa Lindblom | 10/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
| Jozef Pinkerton | 8/10 | 2757 days | 3% |
| Nathan Lal | 8/10 | 2818 days | 3% |
| Lucile Gendre | 7/10 | 2905 days | 3% |
| Alyssa Barbieri | 5/10 | 2997 days | 2% |
| Rogina de Jong | 8/10 | 3000 days | 3% |
| Roeland Driessen | 6/10 | 3009 days | 2% |
| Verena Fendt | 10/10 | 3014 days | 3% |
| Lavkesh Patel | 10/10 | 3026 days | 3% |
| Madi | 7/10 | 3035 days | 2% |
| Alvin soh | 9/10 | 3101 days | 3% |
| Michelle Klein | 8/10 | 3131 days | 2% |
| Kim Donze | 8/10 | 3144 days | 2% |
| Beth Goodrich | 7/10 | 3175 days | 2% |
| Rita Ashby | 8/10 | 3223 days | 2% |
| E Janssen | 10/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
| Fija V | 7/10 | 3269 days | 2% |
| Connie Hopper | 7/10 | 3272 days | 2% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 3275 days | 2% |
| Katrina Thomas | 7/10 | 3375 days | 2% |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 4/10 | 3375 days | 1% |
| Jacqui Deans | 8/10 | 3375 days | 2% |
| Ahmed Mohsen Aly | 2/10 | 3436 days | 1% |
| Stephanie Poppe | 7/10 | 3656 days | 1% |
| Adam Wight | 7/10 | 3684 days | 1% |
| Katie Scholl | 9/10 | 3686 days | 1% |
| Averil Brown | 7/10 | 3707 days | 1% |
| Evelyn | 7/10 | 3709 days | 1% |
| Bert Gielen | 8/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
| M Pruden | 8/10 | 3738 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 3/10 | 3862 days | 1% |
| Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 8/10 | 3925 days | 1% |
| mcp hm | 5/10 | 4016 days | 1% |
| Karolina Gren | 5/10 | 4016 days | 0% |
| Mark | 8/10 | 4029 days | 1% |
| Tomas Shairi | 8/10 | 4043 days | 0% |
| Mara | 10/10 | 4049 days | 0% |
| Andrea Morello | 10/10 | 4049 days | 0% |
| Sophie Wolters | 10/10 | 4055 days | 0% |
| Matt Hyland | 9/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
| Ann-Kathrin Wacker | 9/10 | 4058 days | 0% |
| Lena Wacker | 9/10 | 4058 days | 0% |
| Karel | 9/10 | 4063 days | 0% |
| Anna Guzewiez | 9/10 | 4066 days | 0% |
| Simon Tanguy | 9/10 | 4066 days | 0% |
| Janis Gallois | 10/10 | 4070 days | 0% |
| David Krasner | 9/10 | 4072 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 9/10 | 4075 days | 1% |
| Guillemette | 8/10 | 4079 days | 0% |
| Lena Jensen | 8/10 | 4082 days | 0% |
| Jesper Andersen | 8/10 | 4082 days | 0% |
| Philipp | 9/10 | 4087 days | 0% |
| Mayan Goddat | 10/10 | 4095 days | 0% |
| Daniel Naveh | 8/10 | 4095 days | 0% |
| Jessica Quirk | 10/10 | 4105 days | 1% |
| Thomas Roche | 5/10 | 4108 days | 0% |
| Pokari | 9/10 | 4198 days | 0% |
| s_smith | 10/10 | 4351 days | 0% |
| Socea | 7/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
| Lea Scheuvens | 8/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
| Douglas Walker | 9/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
| patrick+ katerina | 9/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
| Andrea Lang | 7/10 | 4418 days | 1% |
| CanadaGirl23 | 8/10 | 4471 days | 1% |
| Puma17 | 7/10 | 4471 days | 1% |
| Leticia Martin | 10/10 | 4493 days | 1% |
| suzan107 | 10/10 | 4716 days | 1% |
| Keith Helen | 10/10 | 4777 days | 1% |
| OldSchool | 5/10 | 4868 days | 1% |
| Schury | 10/10 | 5114 days | 1% |
| Rissa W | 8/10 | 5171 days | 1% |
| koster | 8/10 | 5442 days | 1% |
| csziegler | 3/10 | 5582 days | 0% |
| Simon Slawner | 9/10 | 5600 days | 1% |
| davidne | 9/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
| Zdenek | 9/10 | 5886 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Twelve Mile Delta Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
8.24% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
76%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.