Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moke Lake Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
129 Valid Reviews
The Moke Lake Campsite experience has a total of 132 reviews. There are 129 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 129 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 59 |
|
46% |
9/10 | 41 |
|
32% |
8/10 | 22 |
|
17% |
7/10 | 6 |
|
5% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite valid reviews is 91.71% and is based on 129 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 129 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
9/10 | 20 |
|
43% |
8/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moke Lake Campsite face-to-face reviews is 90.43% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
91.57%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
tasman travels | 10/10 | 172 days | 100% |
Andi | 9/10 | 293 days | 96% |
Sarah Mitchell | 10/10 | 324 days | 96% |
MORUE | 9/10 | 477 days | 88% |
Niff | 8/10 | 599 days | 79% |
Katie Edser | 9/10 | 630 days | 78% |
Vicky | 9/10 | 630 days | 78% |
Citlali & Mike | 8/10 | 689 days | 73% |
Nicky | 10/10 | 1023 days | 42% |
Suzanne | 8/10 | 1299 days | 21% |
Ange | 10/10 | 1419 days | 15% |
Oliver | 10/10 | 1450 days | 13% |
Sönke | 9/10 | 1450 days | 13% |
Rich | 9/10 | 1450 days | 13% |
Lauren | 10/10 | 1725 days | 6% |
Ashleigh Lim | 10/10 | 1725 days | 6% |
Ju | 9/10 | 1754 days | 5% |
Karin | 9/10 | 1754 days | 5% |
Skyeandjoe | 10/10 | 1785 days | 5% |
Dee Keys | 10/10 | 1785 days | 5% |
Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 1846 days | 5% |
Will M | 10/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
Mirandah | 10/10 | 2091 days | 5% |
Tash & Laura | 8/10 | 2119 days | 4% |
Kath Cox | 10/10 | 2150 days | 4% |
Dave Reynolds | 10/10 | 2181 days | 4% |
Rachael Dyson | 9/10 | 2210 days | 4% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
Rosamund Gilligan | 9/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
Yotakahron | 8/10 | 2395 days | 4% |
Manon Moreno | 9/10 | 2506 days | 3% |
Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 2514 days | 4% |
Michael Talbot | 9/10 | 2581 days | 4% |
Nina Wildgoose | 8/10 | 2586 days | 3% |
Elke Peterson | 10/10 | 2604 days | 4% |
Katherine Sanchez | 6/10 | 2726 days | 3% |
Roger | 9/10 | 2776 days | 3% |
Alison Harway | 10/10 | 2794 days | 3% |
Di Bennett | 10/10 | 2796 days | 3% |
Christer Moberg | 9/10 | 2841 days | 3% |
Daniel Andersson | 10/10 | 2848 days | 3% |
Catherine Kay | 10/10 | 2864 days | 3% |
Alyssa Barbieri | 10/10 | 2865 days | 3% |
vaylenmoothia | 10/10 | 2878 days | 3% |
Rebecca Lindsey | 10/10 | 2879 days | 3% |
Martine Baars | 7/10 | 2884 days | 3% |
Maaike Goudriaan | 10/10 | 2910 days | 3% |
Bob | 9/10 | 2915 days | 3% |
Peter Moore | 10/10 | 2921 days | 3% |
Meghan Maloney | 9/10 | 2971 days | 3% |
Chris | 10/10 | 2971 days | 3% |
Sue Harrington | 10/10 | 3001 days | 3% |
York Tüchelmann | 10/10 | 3118 days | 3% |
Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 3177 days | 2% |
Ed Linklater | 9/10 | 3191 days | 2% |
Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3196 days | 2% |
Ives van Neck | 8/10 | 3208 days | 2% |
Sandy Bell | 10/10 | 3212 days | 2% |
Felicity Fay | 10/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
Lisa Conradie | 9/10 | 3215 days | 2% |
Nathaniel Sutherland | 10/10 | 3245 days | 2% |
Sarah Gurney | 9/10 | 3283 days | 2% |
Antoine Germaine | 7/10 | 3292 days | 2% |
Wilma Senior | 9/10 | 3579 days | 2% |
Vincent S. | 10/10 | 3579 days | 2% |
Evelyn | 8/10 | 3579 days | 2% |
Bert Gielen | 10/10 | 3583 days | 2% |
Ruben Sanchez | 10/10 | 3609 days | 2% |
Alex Leo | 9/10 | 3618 days | 1% |
Lisa Quayle | 7/10 | 3629 days | 1% |
oren schnabel | 10/10 | 3641 days | 1% |
Shelly Weissbrem | 10/10 | 3642 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 3732 days | 1% |
Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 8/10 | 3889 days | 1% |
Claudia Hillebrand | 7/10 | 3890 days | 1% |
Robert Erni | 9/10 | 3895 days | 1% |
Lilli Erni | 9/10 | 3895 days | 1% |
Manuel Bleiker | 10/10 | 3895 days | 1% |
Guillaume | 8/10 | 3926 days | 1% |
Andrew Young | 10/10 | 3945 days | 1% |
Emmanuelle Brevier | 10/10 | 3965 days | 1% |
Gilad Itzkovitz | 9/10 | 3965 days | 1% |
Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 3972 days | 1% |
Marine | 9/10 | 3973 days | 1% |
Kellie | 10/10 | 3981 days | 1% |
mathieu boustie | 10/10 | 4007 days | 1% |
Pokari | 10/10 | 4068 days | 1% |
Jonathan | 10/10 | 4068 days | 1% |
Jen | 7/10 | 4098 days | 1% |
kimbeveridge | 8/10 | 4251 days | 0% |
Friederike | 10/10 | 4266 days | 0% |
Jiri van Straelper | 7/10 | 4269 days | 0% |
Nadia Somat | 9/10 | 4282 days | 0% |
Kathryn Pisco | 9/10 | 4288 days | 0% |
Francois Marchar | 10/10 | 4292 days | 0% |
Francis Runge | 9/10 | 4296 days | 0% |
William Notcutt | 8/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
David | 10/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
Chew (Peter) | 8/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
N Zitscher | 10/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
Jacquemard | 8/10 | 4377 days | 0% |
Jenben | 9/10 | 4402 days | 1% |
Bandzior | 10/10 | 4433 days | 1% |
Andreas Schacke | 9/10 | 4632 days | 1% |
Barbara Berkhout | 10/10 | 4632 days | 1% |
Harry Ruys | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
Christina Greymann | 10/10 | 4651 days | 1% |
Marion Hassink | 9/10 | 4653 days | 1% |
Emma Bagguley | 10/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 4656 days | 1% |
Tadej Ferjan | 10/10 | 4661 days | 1% |
Roberto Hallblom | 8/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
sidcupjon | 8/10 | 4676 days | 1% |
Balonno | 10/10 | 4707 days | 1% |
cassie | 9/10 | 4982 days | 1% |
Faith Whitcraft | 9/10 | 4990 days | 1% |
Marii Joekalda | 8/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Jen Fyfe | 9/10 | 5004 days | 1% |
Keely & Mark Haynes | 9/10 | 5006 days | 1% |
Julia | 9/10 | 5011 days | 1% |
Jesper Hassel | 9/10 | 5018 days | 1% |
Carolin Moberg | 10/10 | 5018 days | 1% |
claudian | 10/10 | 5347 days | 1% |
Thomas K | 10/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
Jules | 9/10 | 5403 days | 1% |
Joel K | 8/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
Nathalie | 8/10 | 5709 days | 1% |
MichaelS1 | 8/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
Mike Howe | 8/10 | 7598 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moke Lake Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.80% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.