Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Purakaunui Bay Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Purakaunui Bay Campsite
Valid Reviews
91 Valid Reviews
The Purakaunui Bay Campsite experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 91 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 91 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 35 |
|
38% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.36% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Purakaunui Bay Campsite valid reviews is 87.36% and is based on 91 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
35 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 91 valid reviews, the experience has 35 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 35 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 13 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
40% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Purakaunui Bay Campsite face-to-face reviews is 89.71% and is based on 35 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
86.98%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucy | 8/10 | 344 days | 100% |
| Nes | 10/10 | 403 days | 99% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 434 days | 96% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 495 days | 92% |
| Carolin | 10/10 | 861 days | 63% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 9/10 | 861 days | 63% |
| Harry | 10/10 | 1014 days | 47% |
| Denise R | 8/10 | 1075 days | 40% |
| Lisa | 8/10 | 1106 days | 37% |
| V L Nelson | 2/10 | 1133 days | 16% |
| Melissa Fecchi | 10/10 | 1134 days | 35% |
| CB | 8/10 | 1134 days | 35% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 1165 days | 32% |
| ElizabethE | 10/10 | 1165 days | 33% |
| Mountain Mamas NZ | 10/10 | 1257 days | 26% |
| Stephen Harris | 4/10 | 1287 days | 15% |
| Melinda Pyke | 10/10 | 1287 days | 24% |
| Rod K | 10/10 | 1471 days | 13% |
| Ellie Richards | 8/10 | 1805 days | 5% |
| Ambili | 9/10 | 1864 days | 5% |
| Campingwithmable | 10/10 | 1895 days | 5% |
| Monkeyalan | 8/10 | 2017 days | 5% |
| Ross | 6/10 | 2109 days | 4% |
| Rebecka | 10/10 | 2230 days | 5% |
| Lauren | 9/10 | 2230 days | 5% |
| RYAN | 10/10 | 2353 days | 4% |
| Andrea | 10/10 | 2353 days | 4% |
| Sally Sargeant-Hu | 10/10 | 2567 days | 4% |
| Lisa Greenfield | 10/10 | 2626 days | 4% |
| Karo | 8/10 | 2687 days | 4% |
| Stephen Lindsay | 7/10 | 2871 days | 3% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 2932 days | 3% |
| Elizabeth Gilbert | 5/10 | 2950 days | 2% |
| Nathalie Gobin | 9/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 3301 days | 2% |
| Linda Livett | 7/10 | 3324 days | 2% |
| Mick Williams | 10/10 | 3352 days | 2% |
| Pritpal Singh | 9/10 | 3408 days | 2% |
| Kath Dawson | 9/10 | 3573 days | 2% |
| Arthur | 10/10 | 3608 days | 2% |
| Matthiew Rey | 8/10 | 3640 days | 1% |
| Howard Kestrel | 9/10 | 3648 days | 2% |
| Lena Wesselink | 10/10 | 3682 days | 1% |
| R Taylor | 9/10 | 3899 days | 1% |
| Marine Pesce | 7/10 | 4019 days | 1% |
| Alex Goddard | 9/10 | 4104 days | 1% |
| Ron Clarke | 8/10 | 4117 days | 1% |
| Andrea | 8/10 | 4178 days | 0% |
| Sue H | 10/10 | 4240 days | 0% |
| Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
| Vuillermet | 9/10 | 4364 days | 0% |
| Simeon W | 6/10 | 4375 days | 0% |
| Vera Kreipe | 8/10 | 4398 days | 1% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 10/10 | 4398 days | 1% |
| Sophie Wolters | 9/10 | 4401 days | 1% |
| Steffen | 10/10 | 4409 days | 1% |
| Arthur Langlume | 9/10 | 4416 days | 1% |
| arnaud paquet | 8/10 | 4421 days | 1% |
| Natalie Boehm | 9/10 | 4421 days | 1% |
| Derek Knight | 9/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| Jean Batiste Le meur | 8/10 | 4441 days | 1% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
| Marine | 10/10 | 4449 days | 1% |
| Daniel McAlpine | 10/10 | 4457 days | 1% |
| Helene & Peter | 7/10 | 4513 days | 1% |
| ozelmer | 6/10 | 4574 days | 1% |
| Zefgangsta | 10/10 | 4758 days | 1% |
| Karina Gratz | 6/10 | 4762 days | 1% |
| Jacob Bernhardt | 6/10 | 4763 days | 1% |
| Phil & Laura | 9/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
| Lucie | 10/10 | 4853 days | 1% |
| Hanna Clement | 9/10 | 5117 days | 1% |
| Nathanael Boehm | 7/10 | 5214 days | 1% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5244 days | 1% |
| DJohnson | 9/10 | 5305 days | 1% |
| Mariette Salden | 9/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
| noname | 8/10 | 5474 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 9/10 | 5476 days | 1% |
| David Mellard | 10/10 | 5481 days | 1% |
| Hendrik Behrens | 10/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
| henriket | 9/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
| Ann-Kathrin Auditor | 10/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
| Andrea Fuchs | 9/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
| C P Lawrence | 8/10 | 5493 days | 1% |
| Anne & Robert | 10/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
| Stanna | 10/10 | 5855 days | 1% |
| Horst | 9/10 | 5857 days | 1% |
| Loleit | 10/10 | 5875 days | 1% |
| Louis Duhaime | 9/10 | 5955 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Purakaunui Bay Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.46% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.