Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Purakaunui Bay Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Purakaunui Bay Campsite
Valid Reviews
91 Valid Reviews
The Purakaunui Bay Campsite experience has a total of 94 reviews. There are 91 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 91 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 35 |
|
38% |
| 9/10 | 25 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 18 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.36% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Purakaunui Bay Campsite valid reviews is 87.36% and is based on 91 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
35 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 91 valid reviews, the experience has 35 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 35 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 13 |
|
37% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
40% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
14% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
9% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Purakaunui Bay Campsite face-to-face reviews is 89.71% and is based on 35 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
86.95%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucy | 8/10 | 248 days | 100% |
| Nes | 10/10 | 307 days | 100% |
| Sophie | 8/10 | 338 days | 97% |
| Bart | 8/10 | 399 days | 94% |
| Carolin | 10/10 | 765 days | 70% |
| Silene.arvinberod@gmail.com | 9/10 | 765 days | 70% |
| Harry | 10/10 | 918 days | 55% |
| Denise R | 8/10 | 979 days | 47% |
| Lisa | 8/10 | 1010 days | 44% |
| V L Nelson | 2/10 | 1037 days | 19% |
| Melissa Fecchi | 10/10 | 1038 days | 43% |
| CB | 8/10 | 1038 days | 42% |
| Emma | 8/10 | 1069 days | 39% |
| ElizabethE | 10/10 | 1069 days | 40% |
| Mountain Mamas NZ | 10/10 | 1161 days | 32% |
| Stephen Harris | 4/10 | 1191 days | 19% |
| Melinda Pyke | 10/10 | 1191 days | 29% |
| Rod K | 10/10 | 1375 days | 17% |
| Ellie Richards | 8/10 | 1709 days | 6% |
| Ambili | 9/10 | 1768 days | 5% |
| Campingwithmable | 10/10 | 1799 days | 5% |
| Monkeyalan | 8/10 | 1921 days | 5% |
| Ross | 6/10 | 2013 days | 4% |
| Rebecka | 10/10 | 2134 days | 5% |
| Lauren | 9/10 | 2134 days | 5% |
| RYAN | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Andrea | 10/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
| Sally Sargeant-Hu | 10/10 | 2471 days | 4% |
| Lisa Greenfield | 10/10 | 2530 days | 4% |
| Karo | 8/10 | 2591 days | 4% |
| Stephen Lindsay | 7/10 | 2775 days | 3% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 2836 days | 3% |
| Elizabeth Gilbert | 5/10 | 2854 days | 2% |
| Nathalie Gobin | 9/10 | 3164 days | 2% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 3205 days | 2% |
| Linda Livett | 7/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
| Mick Williams | 10/10 | 3256 days | 2% |
| Pritpal Singh | 9/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
| Kath Dawson | 9/10 | 3477 days | 2% |
| Arthur | 10/10 | 3512 days | 2% |
| Matthiew Rey | 8/10 | 3544 days | 1% |
| Howard Kestrel | 9/10 | 3552 days | 2% |
| Lena Wesselink | 10/10 | 3586 days | 2% |
| R Taylor | 9/10 | 3803 days | 1% |
| Marine Pesce | 7/10 | 3923 days | 1% |
| Alex Goddard | 9/10 | 4008 days | 1% |
| Ron Clarke | 8/10 | 4021 days | 1% |
| Andrea | 8/10 | 4082 days | 1% |
| Sue H | 10/10 | 4144 days | 0% |
| Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 4267 days | 0% |
| Charlotte | 10/10 | 4268 days | 0% |
| Vuillermet | 9/10 | 4268 days | 0% |
| Simeon W | 6/10 | 4279 days | 0% |
| Vera Kreipe | 8/10 | 4302 days | 0% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 10/10 | 4302 days | 0% |
| Sophie Wolters | 9/10 | 4305 days | 0% |
| Steffen | 10/10 | 4313 days | 0% |
| Arthur Langlume | 9/10 | 4320 days | 0% |
| arnaud paquet | 8/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
| Natalie Boehm | 9/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
| Derek Knight | 9/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
| Jean Batiste Le meur | 8/10 | 4345 days | 0% |
| Stuart Wilson | 9/10 | 4352 days | 0% |
| Marine | 10/10 | 4353 days | 0% |
| Daniel McAlpine | 10/10 | 4361 days | 0% |
| Helene & Peter | 7/10 | 4417 days | 1% |
| ozelmer | 6/10 | 4478 days | 1% |
| Zefgangsta | 10/10 | 4662 days | 1% |
| Karina Gratz | 6/10 | 4666 days | 1% |
| Jacob Bernhardt | 6/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
| Phil & Laura | 9/10 | 4690 days | 1% |
| Lucie | 10/10 | 4757 days | 1% |
| Hanna Clement | 9/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
| Nathanael Boehm | 7/10 | 5118 days | 1% |
| jule | 10/10 | 5148 days | 1% |
| DJohnson | 9/10 | 5209 days | 1% |
| Mariette Salden | 9/10 | 5366 days | 1% |
| noname | 8/10 | 5378 days | 1% |
| Claire Colquhoun | 9/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
| David Mellard | 10/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
| Hendrik Behrens | 10/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| henriket | 9/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| K & J Overton | 9/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Ann-Kathrin Auditor | 10/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| Andrea Fuchs | 9/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
| C P Lawrence | 8/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
| Anne & Robert | 10/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
| Stanna | 10/10 | 5759 days | 1% |
| Horst | 9/10 | 5761 days | 1% |
| Loleit | 10/10 | 5779 days | 1% |
| Louis Duhaime | 9/10 | 5859 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Purakaunui Bay Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.47% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.