Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
275 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 280 reviews. There are 275 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 275 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
35% |
9/10 | 91 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.20% and is based on 275 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 275 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.73%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 108 days | 100% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 139 days | 100% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 169 days | 99% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 200 days | 98% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 229 days | 98% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 229 days | 96% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 260 days | 97% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 352 days | 94% |
Chris | 8/10 | 352 days | 92% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 382 days | 86% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 474 days | 88% |
L&P | 8/10 | 505 days | 84% |
Alley | 10/10 | 505 days | 86% |
Josh | 9/10 | 535 days | 83% |
Niff | 10/10 | 566 days | 82% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 594 days | 80% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 594 days | 80% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 625 days | 78% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 656 days | 76% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 686 days | 72% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 686 days | 74% |
Evan | 10/10 | 686 days | 74% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 717 days | 71% |
Emily | 10/10 | 717 days | 71% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 717 days | 70% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 747 days | 68% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 747 days | 69% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 778 days | 66% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1174 days | 29% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1174 days | 29% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1296 days | 21% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1324 days | 19% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1416 days | 15% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1539 days | 10% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1661 days | 7% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1690 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 1813 days | 5% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 1843 days | 5% |
Guru | 9/10 | 1874 days | 5% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 1874 days | 5% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 1966 days | 5% |
Liz | 8/10 | 1996 days | 5% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 1996 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 1996 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2027 days | 5% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2027 days | 5% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2055 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2055 days | 5% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2117 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2117 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2147 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2178 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2178 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2178 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2241 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2361 days | 4% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2365 days | 4% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2392 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2392 days | 4% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2420 days | 4% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2447 days | 4% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2450 days | 4% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2464 days | 4% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2572 days | 4% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2680 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2713 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2802 days | 3% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2805 days | 3% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 2814 days | 3% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 2874 days | 3% |
Chris | 9/10 | 2907 days | 3% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3054 days | 3% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3074 days | 3% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3108 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3121 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3133 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3168 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3182 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3254 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3386 days | 2% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3487 days | 2% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3527 days | 2% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3537 days | 2% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3547 days | 2% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3548 days | 2% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 3853 days | 1% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 3854 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 3902 days | 1% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 3904 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 3912 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 3919 days | 1% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 3943 days | 1% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4034 days | 1% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4187 days | 0% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4205 days | 0% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4218 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4246 days | 0% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4246 days | 0% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4260 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4277 days | 0% |
John | 9/10 | 4301 days | 0% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4319 days | 0% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4324 days | 0% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4369 days | 0% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4399 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4399 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4491 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4522 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4548 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4564 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4572 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4575 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4577 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4579 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4579 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4580 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4583 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4586 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4592 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4592 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4592 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4592 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4593 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4593 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4594 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4594 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4596 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4597 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4597 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4597 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4598 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4599 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4606 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4606 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4607 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4608 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4608 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4610 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4611 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4611 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4623 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4623 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4625 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 4901 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 4901 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 4921 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 4926 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 4931 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 4931 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 4931 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 4931 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 4932 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 4932 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 4933 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 4933 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 4933 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 4934 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 4935 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 4935 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 4935 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 4935 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 4936 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 4939 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 4939 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 4940 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 4943 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 4943 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 4943 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 4943 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 4943 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 4948 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 4956 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 4958 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 4960 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 4961 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 4962 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 4965 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 4968 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 4969 days | 1% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 4970 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 4971 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 4973 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 4974 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 4975 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5008 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5039 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5100 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5100 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5227 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5231 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5232 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5244 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5246 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5283 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5289 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5289 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5291 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5296 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5300 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5300 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5300 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5302 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5302 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5302 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5309 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5312 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5315 days | 1% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5320 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5323 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5323 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5327 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5334 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5336 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5338 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5339 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5339 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5339 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5341 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5342 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5342 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5347 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5355 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5356 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5359 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5359 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5373 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5398 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5426 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5530 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5559 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5648 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5648 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5665 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5666 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5666 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5668 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5681 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5682 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5682 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5683 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5689 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5695 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5716 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.03% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 76 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 69 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
66 | -0.98% |
67 | -1.00% |
68 | -1.01% |
69 | -1.03% |
70 | -1.04% |
71 | -1.06% |
72 | -1.07% |
… | … |
0.67% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.