G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
277 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 283 reviews. There are 277 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 277 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
34% |
9/10 | 92 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 52 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.18% and is based on 277 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 277 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.95%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 57 days | 99% |
Fredrik | 9/10 | 88 days | 100% |
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 302 days | 96% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 333 days | 95% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 363 days | 94% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 394 days | 92% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 423 days | 91% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 423 days | 89% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 454 days | 89% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 546 days | 84% |
Chris | 8/10 | 546 days | 82% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 576 days | 76% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 668 days | 76% |
L&P | 8/10 | 699 days | 72% |
Alley | 10/10 | 699 days | 73% |
Josh | 9/10 | 729 days | 70% |
Niff | 10/10 | 760 days | 68% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 788 days | 65% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 788 days | 65% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 819 days | 63% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 850 days | 60% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 880 days | 55% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 880 days | 57% |
Evan | 10/10 | 880 days | 57% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 911 days | 53% |
Emily | 10/10 | 911 days | 53% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 911 days | 52% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 941 days | 50% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 941 days | 50% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 972 days | 47% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1368 days | 17% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1368 days | 17% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1490 days | 11% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1518 days | 10% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1610 days | 8% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1733 days | 5% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1855 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1884 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2007 days | 4% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 2037 days | 4% |
Guru | 9/10 | 2068 days | 4% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 2068 days | 4% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2160 days | 4% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2190 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2190 days | 3% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2190 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2221 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2221 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2249 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2249 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2311 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2311 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2341 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2372 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2372 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2372 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2435 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2555 days | 3% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2559 days | 3% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2586 days | 3% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2586 days | 3% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2614 days | 3% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2641 days | 3% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2644 days | 3% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2658 days | 3% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2766 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2874 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2907 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2996 days | 2% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2999 days | 2% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3008 days | 2% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3068 days | 2% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3101 days | 2% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3268 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3302 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3327 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3362 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3376 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3448 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3494 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3580 days | 1% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3681 days | 1% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3721 days | 1% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3731 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3741 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3742 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3832 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4047 days | 0% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4048 days | 0% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4096 days | 0% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4098 days | 0% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4106 days | 0% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4113 days | 0% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4137 days | 0% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4137 days | 0% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4228 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4399 days | 1% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4412 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4440 days | 1% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4440 days | 1% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4454 days | 1% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4471 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 4495 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4513 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4518 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4518 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4518 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4563 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4593 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4593 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4685 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4716 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4716 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4742 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4758 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4766 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4769 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4771 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4777 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4780 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4786 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4787 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4788 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4788 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4790 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4791 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4791 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4791 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4792 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4793 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4800 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4800 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4801 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4802 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4802 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4804 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4805 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4805 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4817 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4817 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4819 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4872 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5095 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5095 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5115 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5120 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5125 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5125 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5125 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5125 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5127 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5127 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5127 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5128 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5129 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5130 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5134 days | 0% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5152 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5154 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5155 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5156 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5159 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5163 days | 0% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5164 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5165 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5167 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5168 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5169 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5202 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5233 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5294 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5421 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5425 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5426 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5440 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5477 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5485 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5490 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5494 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5494 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5494 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5495 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5496 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5506 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5509 days | 0% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5514 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5517 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5521 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5528 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5529 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5530 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5532 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5533 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5533 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5533 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5535 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5536 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5536 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5541 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5542 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5549 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5550 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5553 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5553 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5567 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5579 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5586 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5591 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5592 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5606 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5610 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5620 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5628 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5628 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5707 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5707 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5724 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5753 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5812 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5830 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5842 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5859 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5860 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5862 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5875 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5876 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5876 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5877 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5889 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5910 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-0.98% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 52 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
49 | -0.92% |
50 | -0.94% |
51 | -0.96% |
52 | -0.98% |
53 | -1.00% |
54 | -1.02% |
55 | -1.04% |
… | … |
0.75% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.