Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
275 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 281 reviews. There are 275 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 275 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
35% |
9/10 | 91 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.20% and is based on 275 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 275 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.71%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 203 days | 100% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 234 days | 99% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 264 days | 98% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 295 days | 97% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 324 days | 96% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 324 days | 94% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 355 days | 95% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 447 days | 91% |
Chris | 8/10 | 447 days | 89% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 477 days | 83% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 569 days | 83% |
L&P | 8/10 | 600 days | 80% |
Alley | 10/10 | 600 days | 81% |
Josh | 9/10 | 630 days | 78% |
Niff | 10/10 | 661 days | 77% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 689 days | 75% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 689 days | 75% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 720 days | 72% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 751 days | 69% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 781 days | 65% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 781 days | 67% |
Evan | 10/10 | 781 days | 67% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 812 days | 64% |
Emily | 10/10 | 812 days | 64% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 812 days | 63% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 842 days | 60% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 842 days | 61% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 873 days | 58% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1269 days | 23% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1269 days | 23% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1391 days | 16% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1419 days | 14% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1511 days | 11% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1634 days | 7% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1756 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1785 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 1908 days | 5% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 1938 days | 5% |
Guru | 9/10 | 1969 days | 5% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 1969 days | 5% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2061 days | 5% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2091 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2091 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2091 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2122 days | 5% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2122 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2150 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2150 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2212 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2212 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2242 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2336 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2456 days | 4% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2460 days | 4% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2487 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2487 days | 4% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2515 days | 4% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2542 days | 4% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2546 days | 4% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2559 days | 4% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2668 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2775 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2808 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2897 days | 3% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2900 days | 3% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 2909 days | 3% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 2969 days | 3% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3003 days | 3% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3149 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3169 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3203 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3217 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3263 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3277 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3349 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3395 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3481 days | 2% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3583 days | 2% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3622 days | 2% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3632 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3642 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3734 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 3948 days | 1% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 3949 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 3997 days | 1% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 3999 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4007 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4014 days | 1% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4038 days | 1% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4038 days | 1% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4129 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4282 days | 0% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4300 days | 0% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4313 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4341 days | 0% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4355 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4372 days | 0% |
John | 9/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4414 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4419 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4419 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4419 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4464 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4494 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4494 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4586 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4617 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4617 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4659 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4670 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4674 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4675 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4678 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4681 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4687 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4687 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4687 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4687 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4688 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4688 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4689 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4689 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4691 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4692 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4692 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4692 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4693 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4694 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4701 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4701 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4702 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4703 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4703 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4705 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4706 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4706 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4718 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4718 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4720 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4773 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5029 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5034 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5035 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5038 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5042 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5042 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5043 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5053 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5055 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5056 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5057 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5060 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5063 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5064 days | 1% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5065 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5066 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5068 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5069 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5070 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5103 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5195 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5195 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5322 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5326 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5327 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5339 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5341 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5378 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5386 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5391 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5395 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5395 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5395 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5397 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5407 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5410 days | 1% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5415 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5418 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5418 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5422 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5429 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5431 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5433 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5436 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5437 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5437 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5442 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5443 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5450 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5451 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5468 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5480 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5487 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5492 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5493 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5507 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5521 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5529 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5529 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5608 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5608 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5625 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5654 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5713 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5731 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5743 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5743 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5760 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5761 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5761 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5763 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5776 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5777 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5777 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5778 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5784 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5790 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5811 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-3.33% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 165 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
162 | -3.27% |
163 | -3.29% |
164 | -3.31% |
165 | -3.33% |
166 | -3.35% |
167 | -3.37% |
168 | -3.39% |
… | … |
0.95% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
91%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.