G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
275 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 281 reviews. There are 275 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 275 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
35% |
9/10 | 91 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.20% and is based on 275 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 275 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.72%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 165 days | 100% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 196 days | 99% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 226 days | 99% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 257 days | 98% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 286 days | 97% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 286 days | 95% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 317 days | 96% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 409 days | 92% |
Chris | 8/10 | 409 days | 90% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 439 days | 84% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 531 days | 85% |
L&P | 8/10 | 562 days | 82% |
Alley | 10/10 | 562 days | 83% |
Josh | 9/10 | 592 days | 80% |
Niff | 10/10 | 623 days | 79% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 651 days | 77% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 651 days | 77% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 682 days | 75% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 713 days | 72% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 743 days | 68% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 743 days | 70% |
Evan | 10/10 | 743 days | 70% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 774 days | 67% |
Emily | 10/10 | 774 days | 67% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 774 days | 66% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 804 days | 63% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 804 days | 64% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 835 days | 61% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1231 days | 25% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1231 days | 26% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1353 days | 18% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1381 days | 16% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1473 days | 12% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1596 days | 8% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1718 days | 6% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1747 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 1870 days | 5% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 1900 days | 5% |
Guru | 9/10 | 1931 days | 5% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 1931 days | 5% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2023 days | 5% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2053 days | 5% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2053 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2053 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2084 days | 5% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2084 days | 5% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2112 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2112 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2174 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2174 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2204 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2235 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2235 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2235 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2298 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2418 days | 4% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2422 days | 4% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2449 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2449 days | 4% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2477 days | 4% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2504 days | 4% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2507 days | 4% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2521 days | 4% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2629 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2737 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2770 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2859 days | 3% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2862 days | 3% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 2871 days | 3% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 2931 days | 3% |
Chris | 9/10 | 2964 days | 3% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3111 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3131 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3165 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3178 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3190 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3225 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3239 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3311 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3357 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3443 days | 2% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3544 days | 2% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3584 days | 2% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3594 days | 2% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3604 days | 2% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3605 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 3910 days | 1% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 3911 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 3959 days | 1% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 3961 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 3969 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 3976 days | 1% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4000 days | 1% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4091 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4244 days | 0% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4262 days | 0% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4275 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4303 days | 0% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4303 days | 0% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4317 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4334 days | 0% |
John | 9/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4381 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4456 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4456 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4548 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4579 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4579 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4605 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4621 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4629 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4632 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4634 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4636 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4636 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4637 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4640 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4649 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4649 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4649 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4649 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4650 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4650 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4651 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4651 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4653 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4656 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4663 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4664 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4665 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4667 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4668 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4668 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4680 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4680 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4682 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4735 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 4958 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 4958 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 4978 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 4983 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 4988 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 4988 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 4988 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 4988 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 4990 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 4990 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 4990 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 4991 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 4992 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 4992 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 4992 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 4992 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 4993 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 4996 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 4997 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5000 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5004 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5004 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5005 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5013 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5015 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5017 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5018 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5022 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5025 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5026 days | 1% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5027 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5028 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5030 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5031 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5032 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5065 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5096 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5157 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5157 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5284 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5288 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5289 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5301 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5303 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5340 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5346 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5346 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5353 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5357 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5357 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5357 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5358 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5359 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5359 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5359 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5366 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5369 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5372 days | 1% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5377 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5391 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5392 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5395 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5396 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5398 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5399 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5399 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5404 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5405 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5412 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5413 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5416 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5430 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5442 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5449 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5454 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5455 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5469 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5473 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5483 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5570 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5587 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5616 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5675 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5693 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5705 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5705 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5722 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5723 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5723 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5725 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5738 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5739 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5739 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5740 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5746 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5752 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5773 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.52% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 45 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 126 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
123 | -2.46% |
124 | -2.48% |
125 | -2.50% |
126 | -2.52% |
127 | -2.54% |
128 | -2.56% |
129 | -2.58% |
… | … |
0.85% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.