G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
275 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 280 reviews. There are 275 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 5 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 275 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
35% |
9/10 | 91 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 51 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.20% and is based on 275 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 275 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
93.73%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 154 days | 100% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 185 days | 99% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 215 days | 99% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 246 days | 98% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 275 days | 97% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 275 days | 95% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 306 days | 96% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 398 days | 92% |
Chris | 8/10 | 398 days | 90% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 428 days | 84% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 520 days | 86% |
L&P | 8/10 | 551 days | 82% |
Alley | 10/10 | 551 days | 84% |
Josh | 9/10 | 581 days | 81% |
Niff | 10/10 | 612 days | 80% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 640 days | 78% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 640 days | 78% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 671 days | 75% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 702 days | 73% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 732 days | 69% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 732 days | 70% |
Evan | 10/10 | 732 days | 70% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 763 days | 68% |
Emily | 10/10 | 763 days | 68% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 763 days | 66% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 793 days | 64% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 793 days | 65% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 824 days | 62% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1220 days | 26% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1220 days | 26% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1342 days | 19% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1370 days | 17% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1462 days | 13% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1585 days | 8% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1707 days | 6% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1736 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 1859 days | 5% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 1889 days | 5% |
Guru | 9/10 | 1920 days | 5% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 1920 days | 5% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2012 days | 5% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2042 days | 5% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2042 days | 4% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2042 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2073 days | 5% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2073 days | 5% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2101 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2101 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2163 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2163 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2193 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2224 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2224 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2224 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2287 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2407 days | 4% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2411 days | 4% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2438 days | 4% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2438 days | 4% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2466 days | 4% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2493 days | 4% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2497 days | 4% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2510 days | 4% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2619 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2726 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2759 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 2848 days | 3% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 2851 days | 3% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 2860 days | 3% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 2920 days | 3% |
Chris | 9/10 | 2954 days | 3% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3100 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3120 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3154 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3168 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3179 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3214 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3228 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3346 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3432 days | 2% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3534 days | 2% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3573 days | 2% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3583 days | 2% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3593 days | 2% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3594 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3685 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 3899 days | 1% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 3900 days | 1% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 3948 days | 1% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 3950 days | 1% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 3958 days | 1% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 3965 days | 1% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 3989 days | 1% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 3989 days | 1% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4080 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4233 days | 0% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4251 days | 0% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4264 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4292 days | 0% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4292 days | 0% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4306 days | 0% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4323 days | 0% |
John | 9/10 | 4347 days | 0% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4370 days | 0% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4415 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4445 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4445 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4537 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4568 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4568 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4594 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4610 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4618 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4621 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4623 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4625 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4625 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4626 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4629 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4632 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4638 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4639 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4639 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4640 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4640 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4642 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4643 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4644 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4645 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4652 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4652 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4653 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4654 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4656 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4657 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4669 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4669 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4671 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4724 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 4967 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 4972 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 4977 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 4977 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 4977 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 4977 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 4978 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 4978 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 4979 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 4980 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 4981 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 4981 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 4981 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 4981 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 4982 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 4985 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 4985 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 4986 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 4989 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 4993 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 4993 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 4994 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5002 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5004 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5006 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5007 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5008 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5011 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5014 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5015 days | 1% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5016 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5017 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5019 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5020 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5021 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5054 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5085 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5146 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5273 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5277 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5278 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5290 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5292 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5329 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5335 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5337 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5342 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5346 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5346 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5346 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5347 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5348 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5355 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5358 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5361 days | 1% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5366 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5369 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5369 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5373 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5380 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5381 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5382 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5384 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5385 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5387 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5388 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5393 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5394 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5401 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5402 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5405 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5405 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5419 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5431 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5438 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5443 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5444 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5458 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5462 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5472 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5480 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5480 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5559 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5559 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5576 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5605 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5664 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5682 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5694 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5711 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5712 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5712 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5714 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5727 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5728 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5729 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5735 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5741 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5762 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-2.25% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 49 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 116 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
113 | -2.19% |
114 | -2.21% |
115 | -2.23% |
116 | -2.25% |
117 | -2.27% |
118 | -2.29% |
119 | -2.31% |
… | … |
0.81% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.