G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
277 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has a total of 283 reviews. There are 277 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 277 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 95 |
|
34% |
9/10 | 92 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 52 |
|
19% |
7/10 | 22 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 4 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
87.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks valid reviews is 87.18% and is based on 277 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 277 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.94%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Jojo&Skoko | 8/10 | 65 days | 99% |
Fredrik | 9/10 | 96 days | 100% |
Jen Mac | 10/10 | 310 days | 96% |
Cherish | 10/10 | 341 days | 95% |
Taylor | 10/10 | 371 days | 94% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 402 days | 92% |
Shawn A | 10/10 | 431 days | 91% |
Sandra Staples | 8/10 | 431 days | 89% |
Peter Rickard-Green | 10/10 | 462 days | 89% |
Christian Geiling | 10/10 | 554 days | 84% |
Chris | 8/10 | 554 days | 82% |
Paulo | 7/10 | 584 days | 76% |
Molly M | 10/10 | 676 days | 75% |
L&P | 8/10 | 707 days | 71% |
Alley | 10/10 | 707 days | 73% |
Josh | 9/10 | 737 days | 69% |
Niff | 10/10 | 768 days | 67% |
Courtney Gearhart | 10/10 | 796 days | 65% |
Steffi V. | 10/10 | 796 days | 65% |
Roger Heckly | 10/10 | 827 days | 62% |
Hannah | 10/10 | 858 days | 59% |
Mabel | 8/10 | 888 days | 55% |
Corrine | 10/10 | 888 days | 56% |
Evan | 10/10 | 888 days | 56% |
Eilis | 10/10 | 919 days | 53% |
Emily | 10/10 | 919 days | 53% |
Nicole | 8/10 | 919 days | 51% |
Fiona | 9/10 | 949 days | 49% |
Danny Denhardet | 10/10 | 949 days | 49% |
Lucy | 10/10 | 980 days | 46% |
Gotze | 9/10 | 1376 days | 16% |
J Brown | 10/10 | 1376 days | 17% |
Zara | 10/10 | 1498 days | 11% |
Emma | 8/10 | 1526 days | 10% |
Teesh K | 10/10 | 1618 days | 7% |
Fiona | 8/10 | 1741 days | 5% |
Robert Adler | 10/10 | 1863 days | 5% |
Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 1892 days | 2% |
Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 2015 days | 4% |
Andrew | 10/10 | 2045 days | 4% |
Guru | 9/10 | 2076 days | 4% |
Carolina | 10/10 | 2076 days | 4% |
Rick Percival | 10/10 | 2168 days | 4% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2198 days | 4% |
Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 2198 days | 3% |
Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 2198 days | 2% |
kim thomas | 10/10 | 2229 days | 4% |
TP&MM | 9/10 | 2229 days | 4% |
Brigitta | 7/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2257 days | 4% |
Phil | 7/10 | 2319 days | 4% |
Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 2319 days | 2% |
Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 2349 days | 4% |
Jolanda | 8/10 | 2380 days | 4% |
Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 2380 days | 4% |
Cynthia | 10/10 | 2380 days | 4% |
Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 2443 days | 4% |
Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 2563 days | 3% |
Tati Moron | 10/10 | 2567 days | 3% |
Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 2594 days | 3% |
Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 2594 days | 3% |
Eversons | 9/10 | 2622 days | 3% |
Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 2649 days | 3% |
Katrina | 9/10 | 2652 days | 3% |
Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 2666 days | 3% |
Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 2774 days | 3% |
Duncan | 9/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
Grace White | 10/10 | 2915 days | 3% |
Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 3004 days | 2% |
Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 3007 days | 2% |
Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 3016 days | 2% |
Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 3076 days | 2% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3109 days | 2% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 3256 days | 2% |
Betti | 10/10 | 3276 days | 2% |
Peter Barker | 3/10 | 3310 days | 1% |
S Black | 7/10 | 3323 days | 2% |
Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 3335 days | 2% |
Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 3370 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 3384 days | 2% |
Paul Frost | 9/10 | 3456 days | 2% |
Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 3502 days | 2% |
Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 3588 days | 1% |
Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 3689 days | 1% |
Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 3729 days | 1% |
Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 3739 days | 1% |
Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 3749 days | 1% |
Die Mehles | 7/10 | 3750 days | 1% |
Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 3840 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 4055 days | 0% |
Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 4104 days | 0% |
Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 4106 days | 0% |
Ted Cole | 8/10 | 4114 days | 0% |
Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 4121 days | 0% |
GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 4145 days | 0% |
K. H. | 10/10 | 4145 days | 0% |
ozelmer | 6/10 | 4236 days | 0% |
Grantygrant | 9/10 | 4389 days | 1% |
Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
battum 80 | 3/10 | 4420 days | 0% |
Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 4448 days | 1% |
Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 4462 days | 1% |
Lis Bon | 7/10 | 4479 days | 1% |
John | 9/10 | 4503 days | 1% |
C Schaap | 9/10 | 4521 days | 1% |
roos wubben | 9/10 | 4526 days | 1% |
Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4526 days | 1% |
Ton Franke | 8/10 | 4526 days | 1% |
Dagette | 9/10 | 4571 days | 1% |
Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 4601 days | 1% |
sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 4693 days | 1% |
MeganG | 9/10 | 4724 days | 1% |
HelenKate | 10/10 | 4724 days | 1% |
Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 4750 days | 1% |
Robin Sable | 9/10 | 4766 days | 1% |
Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 4774 days | 1% |
Carole Carter | 8/10 | 4777 days | 1% |
Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 4779 days | 1% |
Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 4781 days | 1% |
J Jmal | 10/10 | 4781 days | 1% |
Roy Barton | 8/10 | 4782 days | 1% |
nztintin | 10/10 | 4785 days | 1% |
Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 4788 days | 1% |
Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
B Sluis | 9/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
Howell Davies | 9/10 | 4794 days | 1% |
Elaine | 10/10 | 4795 days | 1% |
Beeny | 9/10 | 4795 days | 1% |
Stam | 7/10 | 4796 days | 1% |
Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 4796 days | 1% |
Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 4798 days | 1% |
Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
Russell | 9/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
Houter | 9/10 | 4799 days | 1% |
David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 4800 days | 1% |
Janse | 6/10 | 4801 days | 1% |
Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 4808 days | 1% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4809 days | 1% |
Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 4810 days | 1% |
Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 4810 days | 1% |
Gerhard | 9/10 | 4812 days | 1% |
Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 4813 days | 1% |
Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 4813 days | 1% |
Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 4825 days | 1% |
Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 4825 days | 1% |
Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 4827 days | 1% |
deJong | 10/10 | 4880 days | 1% |
Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 5103 days | 1% |
Fontvieille | 8/10 | 5103 days | 1% |
Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 5123 days | 1% |
Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 5128 days | 1% |
Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Nick Foster | 10/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Michael | 10/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Gema | 8/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 5135 days | 1% |
Berger | 10/10 | 5135 days | 1% |
Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 5135 days | 1% |
Mark Vass | 7/10 | 5136 days | 1% |
Robin Smith | 10/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Ven | 9/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
John Duffy | 10/10 | 5137 days | 1% |
Robin Adair | 8/10 | 5138 days | 1% |
Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 5141 days | 1% |
Max | 10/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
Barbara Link | 10/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 5142 days | 0% |
Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
Tinnermans | 8/10 | 5145 days | 1% |
E C Frans | 6/10 | 5149 days | 1% |
Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 5149 days | 1% |
Raith | 9/10 | 5150 days | 1% |
Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 5160 days | 1% |
Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 5162 days | 1% |
Bob Adams | 10/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 5164 days | 1% |
Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 5167 days | 1% |
Roger Lows | 8/10 | 5170 days | 1% |
Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 5171 days | 0% |
Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 5172 days | 1% |
Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 5173 days | 1% |
Remco Smit | 10/10 | 5175 days | 1% |
Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 5176 days | 1% |
Jochen | 9/10 | 5177 days | 1% |
hendrik king | 7/10 | 5210 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 9/10 | 5241 days | 1% |
Montys | 10/10 | 5302 days | 1% |
Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 5302 days | 1% |
Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 5429 days | 1% |
Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 5433 days | 1% |
Anna | 8/10 | 5434 days | 1% |
Lomas | 10/10 | 5446 days | 1% |
Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 5448 days | 1% |
lindam | 10/10 | 5485 days | 1% |
Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
Marg | 8/10 | 5491 days | 1% |
Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 5493 days | 1% |
Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 5498 days | 1% |
Russ Turner | 10/10 | 5502 days | 1% |
Polil | 8/10 | 5502 days | 1% |
Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 5502 days | 1% |
markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 5503 days | 1% |
Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
P.C Kool | 9/10 | 5511 days | 1% |
Rod C | 7/10 | 5514 days | 1% |
Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 5517 days | 0% |
Giaque | 5/10 | 5522 days | 1% |
Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 5525 days | 1% |
Jann Clar | 7/10 | 5525 days | 1% |
Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 5529 days | 1% |
Christian | 10/10 | 5536 days | 1% |
Lewis | 9/10 | 5537 days | 1% |
Annie | 8/10 | 5538 days | 1% |
Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 5540 days | 1% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5541 days | 1% |
Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 5541 days | 1% |
John Winter | 8/10 | 5541 days | 1% |
Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 5543 days | 1% |
grobster | 6/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 5544 days | 1% |
Jessica | 8/10 | 5549 days | 1% |
Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 5550 days | 1% |
Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 5557 days | 1% |
E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 5558 days | 1% |
Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 5561 days | 1% |
Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 5561 days | 1% |
Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
marcusba | 9/10 | 5587 days | 1% |
marijad | 10/10 | 5594 days | 1% |
martint | 10/10 | 5599 days | 1% |
carsteng | 9/10 | 5600 days | 1% |
Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 5614 days | 1% |
Alan Riley | 8/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
Ann Riley | 10/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
Primavesi | 8/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 5618 days | 1% |
X Neils | 9/10 | 5628 days | 1% |
andyge | 9/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
Cheryl | 9/10 | 5636 days | 1% |
bondd | 10/10 | 5715 days | 1% |
harryb | 10/10 | 5715 days | 1% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5732 days | 1% |
Donna | 10/10 | 5761 days | 1% |
John | 10/10 | 5820 days | 1% |
PamB | 9/10 | 5838 days | 1% |
marianneb | 8/10 | 5850 days | 1% |
Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 5850 days | 1% |
SonjaG | 9/10 | 5867 days | 1% |
JaninaF | 10/10 | 5868 days | 1% |
Loethke | 9/10 | 5868 days | 1% |
Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 5870 days | 1% |
GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 5883 days | 1% |
JetteG | 8/10 | 5884 days | 1% |
VolkerS | 9/10 | 5884 days | 1% |
AdelineC | 8/10 | 5885 days | 1% |
Richard | 10/10 | 5891 days | 1% |
Terry | 9/10 | 5897 days | 1% |
john west | 10/10 | 5918 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.09% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 62 days. However the Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Anau Tasman Holiday Parks experience has been adjusted for 60 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
57 | -1.03% |
58 | -1.05% |
59 | -1.07% |
60 | -1.09% |
61 | -1.11% |
62 | -1.12% |
63 | -1.14% |
… | … |
0.77% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
93%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.