Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
236 Valid Reviews
The Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels experience has a total of 242 reviews. There are 236 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 6 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 236 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 91 |
|
39% |
9/10 | 77 |
|
33% |
8/10 | 39 |
|
17% |
7/10 | 19 |
|
8% |
6/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.81% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels valid reviews is 88.81% and is based on 236 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
79 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 236 valid reviews, the experience has 79 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 79 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 22 |
|
28% |
9/10 | 28 |
|
35% |
8/10 | 19 |
|
24% |
7/10 | 8 |
|
10% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.34% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels face-to-face reviews is 87.34% and is based on 79 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
88.61%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Marine | 10/10 | 21 days | 100% |
Anne | 7/10 | 80 days | 93% |
Southern man | 10/10 | 111 days | 99% |
Debyron | 9/10 | 111 days | 98% |
Michelle Smit | 10/10 | 202 days | 98% |
Zoe Grimshaw | 9/10 | 202 days | 97% |
Laura | 8/10 | 202 days | 96% |
Sal | 7/10 | 446 days | 83% |
Rebecca | 9/10 | 568 days | 81% |
Marie Perret | 10/10 | 568 days | 82% |
Dylan | 8/10 | 599 days | 78% |
Charlie | 9/10 | 599 days | 79% |
MB | 10/10 | 691 days | 73% |
Jodie Muller | 9/10 | 691 days | 72% |
Taylor Russell | 7/10 | 691 days | 68% |
FitzHanss | 5/10 | 721 days | 54% |
Ryli West | 7/10 | 721 days | 65% |
Whitney | 6/10 | 721 days | 61% |
Matt Olejniczak | 9/10 | 752 days | 67% |
Gary | 10/10 | 780 days | 65% |
Jaycee | 9/10 | 811 days | 62% |
Arie | 9/10 | 811 days | 62% |
Pierre Marty | 9/10 | 842 days | 59% |
RR | 10/10 | 842 days | 60% |
Karen Parker | 9/10 | 903 days | 53% |
Lara | 10/10 | 903 days | 53% |
Yuvin | 10/10 | 933 days | 50% |
Chantal D | 9/10 | 964 days | 47% |
Hannah and Matthew | 10/10 | 964 days | 47% |
Catherine | 10/10 | 1237 days | 25% |
Trina | 10/10 | 1421 days | 14% |
Tracy W | 10/10 | 1421 days | 14% |
Ramona | 10/10 | 1482 days | 12% |
Rory | 10/10 | 1510 days | 11% |
Michelle | 10/10 | 1572 days | 9% |
ZMad | 10/10 | 1572 days | 9% |
Josia | 10/10 | 1572 days | 9% |
Hamish | 10/10 | 1633 days | 7% |
David | 10/10 | 1755 days | 5% |
Maria | 9/10 | 1847 days | 5% |
Sandra Forstner | 10/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
Clauds | 9/10 | 1876 days | 5% |
Melanie | 10/10 | 1907 days | 5% |
Erica | 9/10 | 1907 days | 5% |
Fran | 9/10 | 1938 days | 5% |
Kellen Richter | 9/10 | 1968 days | 5% |
Susanne | 9/10 | 1968 days | 5% |
Chris Taesali | 8/10 | 1968 days | 5% |
Timothy Davies | 10/10 | 1968 days | 5% |
Elaine | 8/10 | 2029 days | 4% |
Erin | 7/10 | 2091 days | 4% |
Matilda | 10/10 | 2091 days | 4% |
Dominique Q | 10/10 | 2182 days | 4% |
Taylor | 7/10 | 2182 days | 4% |
Jmurray | 10/10 | 2213 days | 4% |
Pat Burns | 8/10 | 2213 days | 4% |
Peter Lillie | 9/10 | 2213 days | 4% |
Ruddah | 10/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
Heather Abbott | 8/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
JT | 6/10 | 2272 days | 4% |
An | 7/10 | 2303 days | 4% |
Matt | 6/10 | 2333 days | 3% |
James & Kerry | 10/10 | 2333 days | 4% |
Grizzly Girl | 8/10 | 2364 days | 4% |
Angela | 9/10 | 2364 days | 4% |
Rachel | 10/10 | 2394 days | 4% |
Dory | 9/10 | 2486 days | 4% |
Candy | 8/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
Matt | 9/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
Christina | 9/10 | 2547 days | 4% |
Nicky Edwards | 8/10 | 2591 days | 3% |
Yasmin Sabir | 10/10 | 2592 days | 3% |
UK 50-something couple | 9/10 | 2606 days | 3% |
Derek Gillard | 10/10 | 2637 days | 3% |
Victor Hernandez | 3/10 | 2662 days | 2% |
Laura Meelynn | 10/10 | 2667 days | 3% |
Nora Tobies | 9/10 | 2673 days | 3% |
Stacey Cheong | 9/10 | 2702 days | 3% |
Samantha Brewin | 10/10 | 2709 days | 3% |
Sandra Jeffers | 7/10 | 2714 days | 3% |
Phil and Mel Rowson | 9/10 | 2717 days | 3% |
Detlef Buxmann | 10/10 | 2737 days | 3% |
Vanessa Stubbs | 9/10 | 2755 days | 3% |
R R | 10/10 | 2759 days | 3% |
CARMERS | 10/10 | 2759 days | 3% |
Aman Yusuf | 10/10 | 2766 days | 3% |
Nat and Chad | 10/10 | 2775 days | 3% |
Chloe McKee | 10/10 | 2799 days | 3% |
Alex Umbers | 9/10 | 2827 days | 3% |
Joanne Haslam | 10/10 | 2862 days | 3% |
Sally Caboche | 10/10 | 2882 days | 3% |
Linda Jones | 10/10 | 2903 days | 3% |
Louise Russell | 9/10 | 2911 days | 3% |
Jerry Bart | 10/10 | 2916 days | 3% |
Grainne Phelan | 9/10 | 2923 days | 3% |
Paul Morris | 9/10 | 2929 days | 3% |
Joe Fram | 10/10 | 2931 days | 3% |
Cathy Mead | 8/10 | 2935 days | 3% |
Paul Smith | 8/10 | 2942 days | 3% |
Jason Perks | 9/10 | 2949 days | 3% |
Erich Brueggermann | 9/10 | 2966 days | 3% |
Lee Burdett | 10/10 | 2987 days | 3% |
Roeland Driessen | 10/10 | 3002 days | 3% |
Rebecca Lindsey | 8/10 | 3002 days | 3% |
Greg Dylewski | 10/10 | 3009 days | 3% |
Petr Jesko | 10/10 | 3038 days | 2% |
Kathryn Meadows | 7/10 | 3063 days | 2% |
Margo Wiltens | 10/10 | 3086 days | 3% |
Ana Ciocchini | 10/10 | 3110 days | 2% |
Rosanne van Dooren | 9/10 | 3114 days | 2% |
Lyn Pobke | 10/10 | 3226 days | 2% |
Pamela Hoffman | 8/10 | 3249 days | 2% |
Diane Klasen | 9/10 | 3254 days | 2% |
Erin Polcyn Sailer | 9/10 | 3257 days | 2% |
Heng Sing Teh | 10/10 | 3282 days | 2% |
Sam Smith-Palomeque | 9/10 | 3294 days | 2% |
Gloria Berlari | 10/10 | 3312 days | 2% |
Corina Sima | 10/10 | 3315 days | 2% |
Chris Kay | 9/10 | 3325 days | 2% |
Udo Morello | 10/10 | 3327 days | 2% |
Volker Stroenisch | 10/10 | 3336 days | 2% |
Laura Daly | 10/10 | 3357 days | 2% |
Nicole CAirns | 10/10 | 3360 days | 2% |
James Whitehead | 7/10 | 3370 days | 2% |
Steve Warren | 10/10 | 3458 days | 2% |
Cassandra Schreier | 10/10 | 3485 days | 2% |
Pam Russell | 10/10 | 3491 days | 2% |
Harriet Bramley | 8/10 | 3493 days | 2% |
Chris Read | 4/10 | 3618 days | 1% |
Steffen Paul | 5/10 | 3623 days | 1% |
Linda Eather | 9/10 | 3634 days | 1% |
Rachel S | 10/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
Kurz Werner | 8/10 | 3643 days | 1% |
Ken | 8/10 | 3664 days | 1% |
Andrew Cruickshank | 8/10 | 3674 days | 1% |
Mike Merrick | 9/10 | 3681 days | 1% |
Averil Brown | 9/10 | 3699 days | 1% |
Robert Warner | 10/10 | 3702 days | 1% |
Elles Janssen | 8/10 | 3733 days | 1% |
Patrick Dezarnaulds | 10/10 | 3742 days | 1% |
Pia Sander | 9/10 | 3764 days | 1% |
Gillian Scott | 9/10 | 4037 days | 1% |
Malcolm & Susan | 9/10 | 4039 days | 1% |
Brita Topp | 9/10 | 4039 days | 1% |
Eva-Maria Krueger | 8/10 | 4039 days | 1% |
Denise Ewbank | 9/10 | 4054 days | 1% |
Steffen | 7/10 | 4055 days | 1% |
Lopez Anandine | 9/10 | 4056 days | 1% |
Sybille Willenbrock | 10/10 | 4061 days | 1% |
Luca Maria Willensrock | 9/10 | 4061 days | 1% |
Michael Uebe | 10/10 | 4070 days | 1% |
Andrea Hiemer | 9/10 | 4074 days | 1% |
S B | 10/10 | 4080 days | 1% |
M K | 10/10 | 4080 days | 1% |
Martin Thibaut | 10/10 | 4090 days | 0% |
John Davis | 9/10 | 4097 days | 0% |
Erin Decker | 10/10 | 4129 days | 0% |
A Farquhar | 10/10 | 4159 days | 0% |
Ron Stenhouse | 8/10 | 4373 days | 0% |
Jiri van Straelper | 9/10 | 4391 days | 1% |
patrick+ katerina | 9/10 | 4404 days | 1% |
Jonas Schelbert | 8/10 | 4412 days | 1% |
Veronica and Jordi | 4/10 | 4423 days | 1% |
doepie277 | 7/10 | 4463 days | 1% |
Margaret and Derek McNeil | 9/10 | 4479 days | 1% |
Anja and Katharina | 10/10 | 4503 days | 1% |
David | 8/10 | 4524 days | 1% |
Lindsay Berquist | 10/10 | 4708 days | 1% |
Stephanie Peter | 10/10 | 4756 days | 1% |
Jill Homewood | 9/10 | 4762 days | 1% |
Tinne Cis | 8/10 | 4766 days | 1% |
Les Barnes | 10/10 | 4778 days | 1% |
Aridne Giraud | 8/10 | 4781 days | 1% |
Manuela Weber | 9/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
Peter Aertssen | 7/10 | 4784 days | 1% |
Horst Langstein | 9/10 | 4791 days | 1% |
dierikx | 10/10 | 4829 days | 1% |
lydzb | 10/10 | 4860 days | 1% |
Martherus | 8/10 | 4867 days | 1% |
Rus | 9/10 | 4890 days | 1% |
DJohnson | 9/10 | 4951 days | 1% |
damaca | 10/10 | 4951 days | 1% |
Graham Greentree | 10/10 | 5112 days | 1% |
Leroy Dimitri | 10/10 | 5117 days | 1% |
Jolien Kruizinga | 9/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
John Tinus | 8/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Tom Bushell | 7/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Nathalie | 10/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Sandra Milch | 10/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Graham Wilson | 9/10 | 5119 days | 1% |
Laurie Smith | 9/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
Juerg & Denise Zuesli | 7/10 | 5128 days | 1% |
Courtney Wood | 8/10 | 5133 days | 1% |
Elise van Haastert | 9/10 | 5134 days | 1% |
Geert Van Tittelboom | 8/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
Matthys Kikke | 8/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
Bucher Weruer | 10/10 | 5139 days | 1% |
Alexander & Stephanie | 8/10 | 5140 days | 1% |
Lauren Pestell | 10/10 | 5142 days | 1% |
John Price | 9/10 | 5153 days | 1% |
Derek Archibald | 9/10 | 5156 days | 1% |
Ellen Thompson | 10/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
Robin Schomburg | 10/10 | 5160 days | 1% |
flyfishingbum | 3/10 | 5163 days | 1% |
dollimyxture | 8/10 | 5194 days | 1% |
Monica Askew | 9/10 | 5417 days | 1% |
davidm239 | 8/10 | 5439 days | 1% |
Jess | 8/10 | 5474 days | 1% |
Martina Pankova | 10/10 | 5475 days | 1% |
Corine van Been | 7/10 | 5482 days | 1% |
Einar | 9/10 | 5488 days | 1% |
Don & Alice | 9/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
John Cox | 8/10 | 5506 days | 1% |
Remko Ebbens | 9/10 | 5513 days | 1% |
T. Timmers | 9/10 | 5514 days | 1% |
Jamie | 9/10 | 5520 days | 1% |
Glenn Williamson | 8/10 | 5521 days | 1% |
Keith Wilde | 8/10 | 5523 days | 1% |
Hanz | 9/10 | 5524 days | 1% |
marcoswi | 10/10 | 5534 days | 1% |
Jonathan Angela | 7/10 | 5542 days | 1% |
Chris Bulman | 9/10 | 5601 days | 1% |
nancyburns | 9/10 | 5620 days | 1% |
Francesca | 9/10 | 5635 days | 1% |
DirkGermany | 10/10 | 5829 days | 1% |
Ger | 10/10 | 5832 days | 1% |
Philipp | 7/10 | 5834 days | 1% |
johnst | 10/10 | 5834 days | 1% |
Rissmann | 8/10 | 5850 days | 1% |
MarcoJ | 9/10 | 5854 days | 1% |
CSander | 8/10 | 5866 days | 1% |
RobC1 | 7/10 | 5869 days | 1% |
JoT | 9/10 | 5869 days | 1% |
RobH | 8/10 | 5870 days | 1% |
Frank | 9/10 | 5877 days | 1% |
winter_uk | 6/10 | 5877 days | 1% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Te Anau Lakeview Holiday Park & Motels does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
1.20% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.