Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
81 Valid Reviews
The Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park experience has a total of 82 reviews. There are 81 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 81 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 11 |
|
14% |
| 9/10 | 19 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 20 |
|
25% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
10% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 7 |
|
9% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
72.59% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park valid reviews is 72.59% and is based on 81 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
18 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 81 valid reviews, the experience has 18 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 18 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
28% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
17% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
11% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
6% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.22% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 82.22% and is based on 18 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
75.11%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah | 7/10 | 115 days | 100% |
| Larissa | 9/10 | 511 days | 91% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 784 days | 69% |
| Lucy | 1/10 | 968 days | 20% |
| Anne S | 8/10 | 1121 days | 35% |
| Suzanne | 9/10 | 1425 days | 15% |
| HSnow | 8/10 | 1667 days | 6% |
| Kelly | 9/10 | 1759 days | 5% |
| Melanie | 5/10 | 1911 days | 4% |
| Neroli | 9/10 | 1942 days | 5% |
| William | 9/10 | 1972 days | 5% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 2003 days | 5% |
| Catharina | 1/10 | 2245 days | 1% |
| Fabian | 5/10 | 2276 days | 3% |
| Steve | 2/10 | 2276 days | 2% |
| Francois & Caroline | 7/10 | 2276 days | 4% |
| Arne | 5/10 | 2276 days | 3% |
| chris marshall | 5/10 | 2276 days | 3% |
| Kelsie | 5/10 | 2337 days | 3% |
| Nifty | 8/10 | 2337 days | 4% |
| Yar Ni Ng | 6/10 | 2398 days | 3% |
| Antony Lewis | 9/10 | 2551 days | 3% |
| Bailey Dunne | 6/10 | 2582 days | 3% |
| Simon Zimmermann | 2/10 | 2598 days | 1% |
| Eversons | 6/10 | 2610 days | 3% |
| Fedor Bezrukov | 2/10 | 2634 days | 1% |
| Wen Xin Tan | 9/10 | 2783 days | 3% |
| Gerry Boobis | 8/10 | 2885 days | 3% |
| Louise Russell | 9/10 | 2915 days | 3% |
| Vicky Moore | 2/10 | 2927 days | 1% |
| Roberto | 6/10 | 2932 days | 2% |
| Sophie Ross | 8/10 | 2955 days | 3% |
| Andy Payne | 8/10 | 3050 days | 2% |
| Joost de Hond | 2/10 | 3054 days | 1% |
| Tom Relou | 3/10 | 3090 days | 1% |
| Maggy Kinniburgh | 3/10 | 3116 days | 1% |
| Michelle Klein | 10/10 | 3127 days | 2% |
| Wayne Jeskie | 10/10 | 3268 days | 2% |
| David Elliott | 8/10 | 3280 days | 2% |
| Goldfinger | 8/10 | 3311 days | 2% |
| R Werder | 8/10 | 3356 days | 2% |
| Sarah Gurney | 8/10 | 3409 days | 2% |
| Penny King | 9/10 | 3438 days | 2% |
| Lesa Price | 9/10 | 3462 days | 1% |
| Steve Warren | 10/10 | 3462 days | 1% |
| Viki Ziemba | 9/10 | 3494 days | 1% |
| AusCampa | 9/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
| Kathy Hart | 10/10 | 3616 days | 1% |
| Chris Read | 8/10 | 3622 days | 1% |
| Rossco | 10/10 | 3646 days | 1% |
| Nyla and Alan Ramsay | 9/10 | 3677 days | 1% |
| Jan Collins | 10/10 | 3696 days | 1% |
| Ron Clarke | 7/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Hol. M. | 7/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| bzh974 | 6/10 | 3767 days | 1% |
| Andy Jobst | 10/10 | 3768 days | 1% |
| Joanne Robertson | 8/10 | 3775 days | 1% |
| travelscot | 9/10 | 3982 days | 0% |
| Anthony Brown | 5/10 | 4095 days | 0% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 4105 days | 0% |
| Jonathan Meun | 7/10 | 4438 days | 0% |
| William Notcutt | 5/10 | 4467 days | 0% |
| Lindsay Berquist | 7/10 | 4712 days | 1% |
| Signe Kaspersen | 9/10 | 4767 days | 0% |
| Steve Goodyear | 10/10 | 4794 days | 0% |
| Andreas Kristiansen | 8/10 | 4796 days | 0% |
| John Heal | 8/10 | 4878 days | 0% |
| prasub | 4/10 | 4894 days | 0% |
| qofd | 7/10 | 5078 days | 1% |
| Jon_and_Family | 9/10 | 5108 days | 1% |
| Judith & John Bishop | 8/10 | 5108 days | 1% |
| Tina Madsen | 4/10 | 5125 days | 0% |
| Lenny Appel | 8/10 | 5140 days | 0% |
| Tyson Burnett | 8/10 | 5140 days | 0% |
| Hadleigh | 7/10 | 5144 days | 0% |
| nelliekaye | 8/10 | 5320 days | 1% |
| Kevin & Chris | 8/10 | 5437 days | 0% |
| Chris Bil | 9/10 | 5499 days | 0% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 5511 days | 0% |
| Bert Tonwen | 10/10 | 5513 days | 0% |
| Ian E | 9/10 | 5528 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.17% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 59 days. However the Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Arrowtown Hampshire Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 113 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 110 | -2.11% |
| 111 | -2.13% |
| 112 | -2.15% |
| 113 | -2.17% |
| 114 | -2.19% |
| 115 | -2.21% |
| 116 | -2.23% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
5.51% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.