Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Canyonz Adventure Company.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Canyonz Adventure Company
Valid Reviews
97 Valid Reviews
The Canyonz Adventure Company experience has a total of 99 reviews. There are 97 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 97 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 86 |
|
89% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
9% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
2% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
98.66% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Canyonz Adventure Company valid reviews is 98.66% and is based on 97 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
12 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 97 valid reviews, the experience has 12 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 12 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 6 |
|
50% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
42% |
| 8/10 | 1 |
|
8% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
94.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Canyonz Adventure Company face-to-face reviews is 94.17% and is based on 12 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
99.68%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coline | 10/10 | 510 days | 100% |
| Manuel Navarro | 10/10 | 510 days | 100% |
| Marcus Weldon | 10/10 | 602 days | 93% |
| Jonas Ho | 10/10 | 813 days | 73% |
| Jay F | 10/10 | 814 days | 73% |
| Rachael | 10/10 | 845 days | 70% |
| Anthony Messina | 10/10 | 875 days | 66% |
| Rhiana Wheadon | 10/10 | 875 days | 66% |
| Tahlia Brody | 10/10 | 875 days | 66% |
| KJB | 10/10 | 936 days | 59% |
| Ron | 10/10 | 1028 days | 48% |
| David | 10/10 | 1089 days | 42% |
| Clar | 10/10 | 1120 days | 39% |
| Joel | 10/10 | 1179 days | 34% |
| Louise | 10/10 | 1210 days | 31% |
| Anne MacAulay | 10/10 | 1210 days | 31% |
| Rah | 9/10 | 1210 days | 31% |
| Darren & Sarah Linton | 10/10 | 1454 days | 15% |
| Brydon | 10/10 | 1454 days | 15% |
| Trudi Miles | 10/10 | 1454 days | 15% |
| Mike Fistonich | 10/10 | 1485 days | 14% |
| brucehoppy@gmail.com | 10/10 | 1485 days | 14% |
| Char | 10/10 | 1485 days | 14% |
| Sally | 10/10 | 1513 days | 12% |
| Kurt | 10/10 | 1544 days | 11% |
| Megan Couzyn | 10/10 | 1605 days | 9% |
| Jayne du Plessis | 10/10 | 1605 days | 9% |
| Lars Wyatt | 10/10 | 1728 days | 6% |
| Felix Hoornaert | 10/10 | 1758 days | 6% |
| Ange | 10/10 | 1850 days | 6% |
| Robert Roy Poapst | 10/10 | 1850 days | 6% |
| Katerina | 10/10 | 1879 days | 6% |
| Wendy | 10/10 | 1910 days | 6% |
| trysomethingnew2020 | 10/10 | 1910 days | 6% |
| Keely Hanē Larkin Meredith | 10/10 | 1941 days | 6% |
| Nicki | 10/10 | 1941 days | 6% |
| Birgit | 10/10 | 1971 days | 6% |
| Mary Bishop | 10/10 | 1971 days | 6% |
| Andrew Ng | 10/10 | 2002 days | 5% |
| Bullet | 10/10 | 2185 days | 5% |
| Rax Anderson | 10/10 | 2244 days | 5% |
| Mackenzie | 10/10 | 2244 days | 5% |
| Kate V | 10/10 | 2244 days | 5% |
| Femke Verbree | 10/10 | 2244 days | 5% |
| Jessy Green | 10/10 | 2244 days | 5% |
| Luke | 10/10 | 2244 days | 5% |
| Tsui-Wen Chen | 10/10 | 2275 days | 5% |
| Ivana | 10/10 | 2581 days | 4% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 2581 days | 4% |
| kmh0369 | 10/10 | 2639 days | 4% |
| Yasmine van Wijngaarden | 10/10 | 2639 days | 4% |
| Stanley Leonard | 10/10 | 2700 days | 4% |
| Paul Hoefer | 10/10 | 2853 days | 4% |
| Erik Schamberger | 10/10 | 2914 days | 3% |
| Christian Tattum | 10/10 | 2914 days | 3% |
| Jan Kerkhof | 10/10 | 2945 days | 3% |
| Julie Roark | 10/10 | 3004 days | 3% |
| Jo Corbett | 10/10 | 3004 days | 3% |
| laure reva | 10/10 | 3004 days | 3% |
| Chris Guy | 10/10 | 3004 days | 3% |
| Daan Terra | 10/10 | 3035 days | 3% |
| Jared Tyler | 10/10 | 3188 days | 3% |
| Robin Stamm | 10/10 | 3305 days | 2% |
| Pauline Misset | 10/10 | 3311 days | 2% |
| Adrienne Hoet | 9/10 | 3314 days | 2% |
| David Stoddard | 10/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
| Jules and Rudy Boonen | 10/10 | 3340 days | 2% |
| Thom McNatt | 10/10 | 3370 days | 2% |
| Debbi O'Sullivan | 10/10 | 3645 days | 2% |
| Mikel Acedo | 10/10 | 3735 days | 1% |
| A J | 10/10 | 4011 days | 1% |
| Bridget Riley | 10/10 | 4042 days | 1% |
| Stef Versluis | 10/10 | 4132 days | 1% |
| Renee Johnson | 10/10 | 4132 days | 1% |
| Gemma Root | 10/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| toby barach | 10/10 | 4376 days | 0% |
| Neil_T | 10/10 | 4407 days | 1% |
| Sugar | 10/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| Stefan Martin | 10/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| Chris D'Amico | 10/10 | 4435 days | 1% |
| rachelg | 9/10 | 4497 days | 1% |
| DylanM | 10/10 | 4497 days | 1% |
| Malena | 9/10 | 4772 days | 1% |
| Clare Cade | 10/10 | 4783 days | 1% |
| GenH | 9/10 | 5107 days | 1% |
| PerspirationJournal | 8/10 | 5289 days | 1% |
| AliB | 10/10 | 5645 days | 1% |
| Carolina Dalmazzo | 10/10 | 5684 days | 1% |
| henka | 10/10 | 5868 days | 1% |
| Philipp | 9/10 | 5901 days | 1% |
| Jasmine | 10/10 | 5903 days | 1% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 5903 days | 1% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 5909 days | 1% |
| Jess | 9/10 | 5963 days | 1% |
| Tim | 10/10 | 5967 days | 1% |
| Stef | 9/10 | 6547 days | 1% |
| Fred Highsmith | 8/10 | 6567 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Canyonz Adventure Company experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-3.85% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 59 days. However the Canyonz Adventure Company experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Canyonz Adventure Company experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -3.80% |
| 198 | -3.81% |
| 199 | -3.83% |
| 200 | -3.85% |
| 201 | -3.87% |
| 202 | -3.89% |
| 203 | -3.91% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.36% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.