Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Monarch Wildlife Cruises & Tours.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
45 Valid Reviews
The Monarch Wildlife Cruises & Tours experience has a total of 46 reviews. There are 45 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 20 |
|
44% |
9/10 | 11 |
|
24% |
8/10 | 10 |
|
22% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.22% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Monarch Wildlife Cruises & Tours valid reviews is 90.22% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
28 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 45 valid reviews, the experience has 28 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 28 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 7 |
|
25% |
9/10 | 10 |
|
36% |
8/10 | 7 |
|
25% |
7/10 | 3 |
|
11% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
4% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
86.79% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Monarch Wildlife Cruises & Tours face-to-face reviews is 86.79% and is based on 28 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
89.89%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Sevi | 8/10 | 2854 days | 100% |
Chris | 9/10 | 3233 days | 75% |
Des Corner | 10/10 | 3274 days | 73% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3293 days | 71% |
Stefanie Menz | 9/10 | 4298 days | 3% |
Peer Krumrey | 10/10 | 4298 days | 3% |
Jim Woodruff | 10/10 | 4339 days | 0% |
David | 8/10 | 4431 days | 32% |
Hilbert vanEssen | 7/10 | 4673 days | 30% |
VAGABOND | 10/10 | 4736 days | 32% |
Dorthe | 10/10 | 4768 days | 32% |
Lydia McLean | 10/10 | 4783 days | 32% |
Geoff Shutt | 10/10 | 4981 days | 32% |
Juergen Wolf | 7/10 | 5032 days | 30% |
Kiefer Osterrieder | 8/10 | 5065 days | 32% |
chrissie2011 | 10/10 | 5101 days | 32% |
Wendy | 10/10 | 5132 days | 32% |
Lizzie | 8/10 | 5132 days | 32% |
davidm239 | 9/10 | 5346 days | 32% |
Annette | 10/10 | 5407 days | 32% |
Terry Phillips | 10/10 | 5432 days | 32% |
John Winter | 9/10 | 5432 days | 32% |
Rosemary Macdonald | 9/10 | 5466 days | 32% |
DimitriD | 9/10 | 5758 days | 32% |
Max | 10/10 | 5760 days | 32% |
GrahamM1 | 10/10 | 5774 days | 32% |
ChristineM | 9/10 | 5774 days | 32% |
SimonR | 7/10 | 5775 days | 30% |
HovingL | 9/10 | 5781 days | 32% |
purplekat99 | 8/10 | 5831 days | 32% |
stephanie | 8/10 | 5845 days | 32% |
Chris Willsher | 10/10 | 5855 days | 32% |
Stephanie Schikora | 10/10 | 5884 days | 32% |
Carrie | 9/10 | 5888 days | 32% |
robthorp | 10/10 | 5935 days | 32% |
eve | 10/10 | 5935 days | 32% |
pruevitt | 10/10 | 5949 days | 32% |
Rob and Dorothy | 8/10 | 6111 days | 32% |
jahirst | 10/10 | 6123 days | 32% |
Mark | 6/10 | 6169 days | 27% |
Sue | 8/10 | 6459 days | 32% |
Jim | 9/10 | 6459 days | 32% |
Fenke | 8/10 | 6483 days | 32% |
Roy | 10/10 | 6488 days | 32% |
Colin | 8/10 | 6515 days | 32% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Monarch Wildlife Cruises & Tours experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.04% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 41 days. However the Monarch Wildlife Cruises & Tours experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Monarch Wildlife Cruises & Tours experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -3.98% |
198 | -4.00% |
199 | -4.02% |
200 | -4.04% |
201 | -4.06% |
202 | -4.08% |
203 | -4.10% |
… | … |
1.66% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.