Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Greta Valley Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Greta Valley Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

21 Valid Reviews

The Greta Valley Camping Ground experience has a total of 22 reviews. There are 21 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 21 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 10
48%
9/10 2
10%
8/10 6
29%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
5%
5/10 1
5%
4/10 1
5%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

86.19% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Greta Valley Camping Ground valid reviews is 86.19% and is based on 21 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

6 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 21 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 2
33%
9/10 0
0%
8/10 2
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 1
17%
5/10 1
17%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

78.33% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Greta Valley Camping Ground face-to-face reviews is 78.33% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

89.30%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Tracey Chappell 10/10 140 days 100%
KnP 8/10 140 days 98%
Sara 10/10 475 days 88%
Colin 8/10 656 days 75%
Marjan 8/10 809 days 62%
Grace 9/10 1144 days 31%
Alejandro Krause 10/10 1386 days 16%
julie leadbetter 10/10 1813 days 5%
Garry 10/10 2058 days 4%
Sunny 4/10 2209 days 3%
Marie Sassenberg 9/10 2240 days 4%
Thiam Chun 10/10 2270 days 4%
Peter Barker 10/10 3170 days 2%
Craig Ferry 8/10 3180 days 2%
Kevin Johnston 8/10 3213 days 2%
Adide porto 10/10 3510 days 2%
Malgorzata 10/10 4284 days 0%
Michal 8/10 4284 days 0%
Przemystaw Tymizyszyn 10/10 4284 days 0%
Andrew Lonsdale 5/10 5694 days 0%
CarolN 6/10 5694 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Greta Valley Camping Ground experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-2.28% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 44 days. However the Greta Valley Camping Ground experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Greta Valley Camping Ground experience has been adjusted for 113 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
110 -2.22%
111 -2.24%
112 -2.26%
113 -2.28%
114 -2.30%
115 -2.32%
116 -2.34%

Balancing Adjustment

1.45% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

89%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.