Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Collingwood Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

CC
Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Collingwood Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

56 Valid Reviews

The Collingwood Holiday Park experience has a total of 58 reviews. There are 56 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 56 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
38%
9/10 16
29%
8/10 11
20%
7/10 3
5%
6/10 3
5%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
2%

86.79% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Collingwood Holiday Park valid reviews is 86.79% and is based on 56 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

17 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 56 valid reviews, the experience has 17 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 17 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 3
18%
9/10 3
18%
8/10 5
29%
7/10 2
12%
6/10 3
18%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 1
6%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

78.24% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Collingwood Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 78.24% and is based on 17 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

93.75%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
EI 10/10 145 days 100%
Kingyclan 9/10 450 days 89%
Jane 9/10 511 days 85%
Chloe 10/10 542 days 84%
Vanda 10/10 756 days 68%
Christian Wood 10/10 815 days 63%
CB 7/10 815 days 58%
Bayart 9/10 815 days 62%
RR 10/10 846 days 60%
Florian 10/10 876 days 57%
M&G Papamoa 10/10 1149 days 31%
Scott Lindique 10/10 1180 days 29%
Carlos. Christchurch 10/10 1211 days 26%
Graeme 8/10 1486 days 11%
Laz. 8/10 1486 days 11%
Kumar 1/10 1514 days 4%
Clive 9/10 1545 days 9%
Paul Smith 9/10 2245 days 4%
Stephen Lindsay 9/10 2521 days 3%
Colin Petherbridge 9/10 2622 days 3%
Geart-Jan Benedictus 8/10 2645 days 3%
Blu Ice 10/10 2690 days 3%
Matt 10/10 2886 days 2%
Freddy Gates 8/10 2923 days 2%
Dave Kitson 10/10 2941 days 2%
Francis Williams 10/10 3004 days 2%
Paul Miller 9/10 3321 days 2%
Ives van Neck 10/10 3327 days 2%
Jean marc Daubenfeld 10/10 3366 days 2%
Steffen and Johannes 8/10 3391 days 1%
Scott Brooks 10/10 3625 days 1%
Sarrob Sarrob 9/10 3678 days 1%
Martin Bakker 9/10 3737 days 1%
Mark Angell 9/10 3746 days 1%
Chrissy Clements 9/10 3798 days 1%
Sunny Sailing 9/10 3951 days 0%
Brita Topp 8/10 4012 days 0%
Sarah 7/10 4051 days 0%
Sanne Sprogoe Borgaa 10/10 4083 days 0%
Lars Borgaa 8/10 4083 days 0%
Huang Wai 9/10 4090 days 0%
Elin Andersson 8/10 4102 days 0%
Elin Paulssen 9/10 4102 days 0%
GARRYBLOWER 10/10 4133 days 0%
Collacott 9/10 4422 days 0%
Owen Dunning 6/10 4777 days 0%
Katrin 10/10 4795 days 0%
aardvark 8/10 5047 days 1%
Marjan Van Den Braak 7/10 5140 days 0%
Waitson 8/10 5140 days 0%
inda Hall 8/10 5164 days 0%
Lorena 10/10 5532 days 1%
Norbert Hainz 4/10 5545 days 0%
helennz 6/10 5548 days 0%
Mr & Mrs Sage 10/10 5549 days 0%
Barry Treve 6/10 5845 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Collingwood Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-2.49% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 59 days. However the Collingwood Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Collingwood Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 130 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
127 -2.44%
128 -2.46%
129 -2.48%
130 -2.49%
131 -2.51%
132 -2.53%
133 -2.55%

Balancing Adjustment

0.84% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.