G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Belt Road Seaside Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
![](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg width="300" height="300" viewBox="0 0 300 300" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><rect id="bg" width="300" height="300" fill="rgb(46,196,145)" /><path d="m 150 605 Q 206 94 -305 150 Q 206 206 150 -305 Q 94 206 605 150 Q 94 94 150 605 z" fill="rgb(70,136,0)" /><path d="m 150 515 Q 296 4 -215 150 Q 296 296 150 -215 Q 4 296 515 150 Q 4 4 150 515 z" fill="rgb(185,119,255)" /><path d="m 150 176 Q 165 135 124 150 Q 165 165 150 124 Q 135 165 176 150 Q 135 135 150 176 z" fill="rgb(209,59,110)" /></svg>)
Belt Road Seaside Holiday Park
Valid Reviews
52 Valid Reviews
The Belt Road Seaside Holiday Park experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 52 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 52 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 23 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
15% |
| 8/10 | 9 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 4 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 5 |
|
10% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
85.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Belt Road Seaside Holiday Park valid reviews is 85.19% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
84.74%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morgane | 9/10 | 88 days | 100% |
| NZROVER | 6/10 | 149 days | 86% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 333 days | 95% |
| Beth | 9/10 | 423 days | 90% |
| Liam Dent | 9/10 | 485 days | 87% |
| Heather Carston | 7/10 | 515 days | 80% |
| Knut | 8/10 | 515 days | 84% |
| Marie Perret | 7/10 | 546 days | 78% |
| Dave | 9/10 | 546 days | 83% |
| May | 10/10 | 699 days | 73% |
| Trui Waalwijk | 8/10 | 760 days | 67% |
| Peter & trixie Moss | 1/10 | 819 days | 25% |
| Jared | 10/10 | 819 days | 63% |
| Hope | 10/10 | 819 days | 63% |
| DAVE | 10/10 | 819 days | 63% |
| Nina | 5/10 | 1215 days | 20% |
| Cphm41 | 10/10 | 1276 days | 22% |
| Linda | 8/10 | 1733 days | 5% |
| Dom | 6/10 | 1884 days | 4% |
| Sandra Day | 10/10 | 1915 days | 5% |
| Kat Pope | 10/10 | 2007 days | 4% |
| Martinez Whanau | 6/10 | 2099 days | 4% |
| Ranjit | 5/10 | 2190 days | 3% |
| Anders Knutsson | 10/10 | 2279 days | 4% |
| Michelle | 10/10 | 2311 days | 4% |
| Andy | 6/10 | 2402 days | 3% |
| Gio | 8/10 | 2464 days | 3% |
| Eric Tunnicliffe | 10/10 | 2826 days | 3% |
| Rima | 7/10 | 3062 days | 2% |
| Ray Wilton | 10/10 | 3115 days | 2% |
| Jeffrey Ross | 10/10 | 3124 days | 2% |
| Nick Coulson | 10/10 | 3342 days | 2% |
| Malcolm Ridge | 10/10 | 3406 days | 2% |
| Jeremy Little | 10/10 | 3410 days | 2% |
| Joe Goodson | 10/10 | 3444 days | 2% |
| Louise Tulp | 10/10 | 3446 days | 2% |
| Christoph Fischer | 9/10 | 3760 days | 1% |
| Radek Ouhel | 9/10 | 3771 days | 1% |
| Bram and Laura | 9/10 | 3772 days | 0% |
| Gary Spaz | 10/10 | 3832 days | 1% |
| dominique raccah | 10/10 | 4137 days | 0% |
| Gates Whanau | 8/10 | 4137 days | 0% |
| David Wood | 7/10 | 4198 days | 0% |
| Sally02 | 6/10 | 4198 days | 0% |
| Nina Coopmans | 10/10 | 4381 days | 0% |
| tanyap | 8/10 | 4502 days | 1% |
| KDS_Holiday | 9/10 | 4502 days | 1% |
| hendrik king | 8/10 | 4868 days | 1% |
| rebb | 10/10 | 5143 days | 1% |
| lyndavid | 8/10 | 5143 days | 1% |
| Kevp72 | 8/10 | 5171 days | 1% |
| Phyl | 10/10 | 5508 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Belt Road Seaside Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.24% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Belt Road Seaside Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Belt Road Seaside Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 66 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 63 | -1.19% |
| 64 | -1.21% |
| 65 | -1.23% |
| 66 | -1.24% |
| 67 | -1.26% |
| 68 | -1.28% |
| 69 | -1.30% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
2.14% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
86%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.