G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Opunake Beach Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
210 Valid Reviews
The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 223 reviews. There are 210 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 13 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 210 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 108 |
|
51% |
9/10 | 71 |
|
34% |
8/10 | 23 |
|
11% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
4/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Opunake Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 92.19% and is based on 210 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
14 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 210 valid reviews, the experience has 14 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 14 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
43% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
8/10 | 4 |
|
29% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.43% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Opunake Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 91.43% and is based on 14 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
92.86%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Carla | 10/10 | 409 days | 100% |
Graeme | 9/10 | 440 days | 97% |
Bec | 10/10 | 684 days | 81% |
W Sanders | 10/10 | 805 days | 70% |
jason walsh | 8/10 | 866 days | 62% |
Rachel | 9/10 | 896 days | 59% |
Mark | 8/10 | 896 days | 59% |
Esther | 9/10 | 927 days | 56% |
Jim & Ann | 9/10 | 927 days | 56% |
Michael Dean McNaught | 3/10 | 927 days | 31% |
steve | 9/10 | 988 days | 49% |
Kore | 10/10 | 1019 days | 46% |
Dianne Sutton | 10/10 | 1019 days | 46% |
Des Barker | 9/10 | 1049 days | 43% |
Yolanda Chu | 10/10 | 1108 days | 38% |
Vicki T | 10/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Leon C | 9/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Dawn Sparrow | 10/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Fleur Devonshire | 9/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Doris Burke | 10/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Adelaide Burgess | 10/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Gonzalez | 9/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Katherine Paltridge | 10/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Annie | 9/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Tracey | 10/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Jordan | 9/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Ashley | 10/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Craig Hanover | 10/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Frank and Heather Eustace | 9/10 | 1139 days | 35% |
Jakeman-Sili Family | 9/10 | 1170 days | 32% |
Geoff H | 9/10 | 1170 days | 32% |
Trish Bartlett | 10/10 | 1231 days | 28% |
sherry kemp | 9/10 | 1323 days | 21% |
Kellie | 9/10 | 1323 days | 21% |
Bruce Dear | 8/10 | 1353 days | 19% |
Alex | 10/10 | 1353 days | 20% |
Grant Koedyk | 9/10 | 1353 days | 19% |
Oliver | 9/10 | 1384 days | 18% |
Maria | 9/10 | 1414 days | 16% |
Keagan | 8/10 | 1414 days | 16% |
John Reardon | 9/10 | 1445 days | 14% |
lorraine pratt | 9/10 | 1445 days | 14% |
Vanessa Were | 9/10 | 1445 days | 14% |
Kate | 10/10 | 1445 days | 15% |
Judy Zieltjes | 10/10 | 1473 days | 13% |
Angie | 9/10 | 1473 days | 13% |
Keri | 10/10 | 1473 days | 13% |
Shelly | 10/10 | 1473 days | 13% |
Michelle | 9/10 | 1473 days | 13% |
Amanda | 8/10 | 1504 days | 12% |
Adrian Whistler | 9/10 | 1504 days | 12% |
Craig and Tracy Bailey | 9/10 | 1504 days | 12% |
Towers family | 10/10 | 1504 days | 12% |
Kirikizzie | 9/10 | 1504 days | 12% |
Clare | 10/10 | 1504 days | 12% |
Charlotte | 10/10 | 1504 days | 12% |
Seanna | 9/10 | 1535 days | 11% |
Lydia | 10/10 | 1535 days | 11% |
Josie Reid | 10/10 | 1535 days | 11% |
David Sopp | 10/10 | 1565 days | 10% |
Tairongo Hauwaho | 10/10 | 1565 days | 10% |
Mandy | 10/10 | 1565 days | 10% |
Nelson | 10/10 | 1565 days | 10% |
Lindsay Berquist | 9/10 | 1596 days | 9% |
Sandy Crutch | 8/10 | 1596 days | 9% |
Gareth O’Brien | 10/10 | 1596 days | 9% |
Jean Reverdy | 10/10 | 1596 days | 9% |
Sue | 10/10 | 1626 days | 8% |
Janice & Jim Waller | 10/10 | 1626 days | 8% |
Gary Ashton | 10/10 | 1626 days | 8% |
Emily | 10/10 | 1688 days | 7% |
Elaine Wilson | 9/10 | 1688 days | 7% |
Anna | 9/10 | 1749 days | 6% |
Ithri Araoune | 10/10 | 1749 days | 6% |
Noel & Ruby Thompson | 9/10 | 1810 days | 5% |
Kristie Mason | 10/10 | 1810 days | 6% |
Jill Mackay | 10/10 | 1810 days | 6% |
Lea File | 10/10 | 1810 days | 6% |
Jo Maree Sansom | 10/10 | 1839 days | 5% |
Julie | 10/10 | 1870 days | 5% |
Lisa | 9/10 | 1870 days | 5% |
School buddies | 10/10 | 1870 days | 5% |
Dudley | 9/10 | 1870 days | 5% |
SW | 8/10 | 1870 days | 5% |
megan | 8/10 | 1901 days | 5% |
Shelley Juddd | 10/10 | 1901 days | 5% |
Carla | 10/10 | 1901 days | 5% |
Linda Lamprecht | 9/10 | 1962 days | 5% |
Craig | 9/10 | 2084 days | 5% |
Jill | 9/10 | 2115 days | 5% |
Elizabeth Evans | 10/10 | 2145 days | 5% |
James | 10/10 | 2145 days | 5% |
Kim Nott | 10/10 | 2145 days | 5% |
Kieley | 10/10 | 2176 days | 5% |
J Hornby | 10/10 | 2176 days | 5% |
james | 10/10 | 2176 days | 5% |
Christine (solo traveller) | 10/10 | 2204 days | 5% |
Linda Belcher | 9/10 | 2204 days | 5% |
Aaron Cox | 10/10 | 2204 days | 5% |
audrey young | 10/10 | 2204 days | 5% |
Fanie Otto | 10/10 | 2204 days | 5% |
Jaime | 10/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Marea | 10/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Jeremy Hapeta | 10/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Matt Moorby | 8/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Teresa homan | 7/10 | 2235 days | 4% |
James Richardson | 10/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
J Pascoe | 8/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Michelle | 10/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Neville Lester | 9/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
AlanT | 10/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Andy | 9/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
fiona close | 9/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Michelle | 10/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Annika Eckelt | 9/10 | 2235 days | 5% |
Barbara | 10/10 | 2266 days | 5% |
Hope Fletcher | 9/10 | 2266 days | 5% |
Andre Bezuidenhout | 9/10 | 2266 days | 5% |
Carleen | 10/10 | 2266 days | 5% |
Mel | 10/10 | 2266 days | 5% |
K Small | 4/10 | 2296 days | 3% |
Hope | 9/10 | 2419 days | 4% |
Jenny Saywood | 9/10 | 2449 days | 4% |
Aaron | 9/10 | 2449 days | 4% |
Taranaki Caravan Club | 9/10 | 2449 days | 4% |
Peter | 10/10 | 2479 days | 4% |
Carrol Govan | 10/10 | 2480 days | 4% |
Moana Olliver | 10/10 | 2510 days | 4% |
B Olliver | 8/10 | 2510 days | 4% |
J Ross | 8/10 | 2510 days | 4% |
Damian. | 10/10 | 2510 days | 4% |
Aaron Hine | 9/10 | 2541 days | 4% |
G Bingham | 8/10 | 2541 days | 4% |
Carina Meares | 10/10 | 2541 days | 4% |
Judy Black | 9/10 | 2541 days | 4% |
Greg Morris | 9/10 | 2568 days | 4% |
Elle C | 9/10 | 2568 days | 4% |
Leeanne Railton | 10/10 | 2569 days | 4% |
Keith Salway | 9/10 | 2580 days | 2% |
Eve Ford | 10/10 | 2599 days | 4% |
Maree Rush | 10/10 | 2599 days | 4% |
maryKB | 9/10 | 2630 days | 4% |
Jye Hurrell | 8/10 | 2657 days | 4% |
Neville Lester | 9/10 | 2660 days | 4% |
Chris Cameron | 10/10 | 2660 days | 4% |
Diana Evers | 2/10 | 2681 days | 2% |
Wayne Stokes | 10/10 | 2783 days | 3% |
Kim Deam | 9/10 | 2933 days | 3% |
Annmarie Siciliano | 10/10 | 2964 days | 3% |
Arnita Hunt | 9/10 | 2964 days | 3% |
David Coyle | 10/10 | 2985 days | 3% |
Catherine tempero | 8/10 | 2995 days | 3% |
Rima | 10/10 | 3017 days | 3% |
Penny Hopkins | 10/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
Scott Walden | 10/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015 | 8/10 | 3330 days | 2% |
Sam McDonnell | 10/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
Lisa Ison | 8/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
Donna Katene | 10/10 | 3331 days | 2% |
Rachel Greenland | 10/10 | 3361 days | 2% |
Anja Niechziol | 10/10 | 3391 days | 2% |
Leslie Turner | 8/10 | 3422 days | 2% |
Robyn Weideman | 10/10 | 3605 days | 2% |
Geraldine | 9/10 | 3605 days | 2% |
Melvin Spear | 9/10 | 3633 days | 2% |
peter bird | 10/10 | 3636 days | 2% |
Fanie Otto | 10/10 | 3636 days | 2% |
ana welham | 8/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
Rachel Worrall | 10/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
Bryan Mainwaring | 10/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
Charlie Te Awhe | 10/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
Nina Helmling | 9/10 | 4005 days | 0% |
Michael Turek | 10/10 | 4061 days | 1% |
mr burns | 5/10 | 4061 days | 0% |
dominique raccah | 5/10 | 4092 days | 0% |
J B | 4/10 | 4092 days | 0% |
Glen Cameron | 10/10 | 4214 days | 0% |
Henk_Huurnink | 9/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
Megan | 10/10 | 4367 days | 0% |
kim sowman | 9/10 | 4395 days | 1% |
Sophia Hume | 10/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
SarahC | 9/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
WendyTimarac | 10/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
opunakecampers | 10/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
Rachael Thony | 10/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
Rachael Webb | 10/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
Bob2000 | 9/10 | 4426 days | 1% |
lindamoore | 10/10 | 4457 days | 1% |
pst | 10/10 | 4487 days | 1% |
Fredmmcain12 | 10/10 | 4518 days | 1% |
TravelNZ | 10/10 | 4518 days | 1% |
Moni01 | 3/10 | 4701 days | 1% |
Lars | 8/10 | 4741 days | 1% |
Lee Lloyd | 8/10 | 4742 days | 1% |
AlisonBrett | 9/10 | 4761 days | 1% |
PaxJanssen | 9/10 | 4792 days | 1% |
tonyleiman | 10/10 | 4792 days | 1% |
Scheler | 10/10 | 5097 days | 1% |
rebb | 9/10 | 5098 days | 1% |
Gael Romain | 8/10 | 5098 days | 1% |
patra374 | 9/10 | 5126 days | 1% |
Puravida | 9/10 | 5188 days | 1% |
Ralph | 10/10 | 5460 days | 1% |
Katharina | 10/10 | 5466 days | 1% |
Ed & Pat Mitchell | 9/10 | 5471 days | 1% |
Annemiek and Rianne | 10/10 | 5504 days | 1% |
pedawrds | 10/10 | 5542 days | 1% |
thomash | 10/10 | 5547 days | 1% |
Andreas Sterki | 8/10 | 5561 days | 1% |
Shane and Kate Wilkinson | 9/10 | 5575 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.15% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 52 days. However the Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Opunake Beach Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.09% |
198 | -4.11% |
199 | -4.13% |
200 | -4.15% |
201 | -4.18% |
202 | -4.20% |
203 | -4.22% |
… | … |
1.18% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.